Measurement properties of observational gait analysis in patients with stroke: a systematic review.

Yugo Takeda, Aisuke Takahashi, Taishi Kitsu, Katsuhiro Furukawa
{"title":"Measurement properties of observational gait analysis in patients with stroke: a systematic review.","authors":"Yugo Takeda, Aisuke Takahashi, Taishi Kitsu, Katsuhiro Furukawa","doi":"10.1589/jpts.37.303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[Purpose] This study aimed to conduct a systematic review the measurement properties of standardized observational gait analysis (OGA) tools for patients with stroke. [Participants and Methods] A systematically search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and PEDro databases using stroke- and gait-related keywords. No time restrictions were applied. Studies evaluating OGA using gait analysis tools were included. The methodological quality of the selected studies was assessed using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. [Results] A total of eighteen studies utilizing four gait analysis tools were identified. Sixteen studies employed video-based measurements. The GAIT and WGS tools were assessed for reliability, validity, responsiveness, and interpretability. However, the overall methodological quality of these assessments was not rated as high. [Conclusion] Video-based OGA holds significant potential for clinical applications, but several challenges remain to be met. Standardizing video recording protocols and measurement methods are essential and additional research is needed to determine the qualifications and expertise of the evaluators. Although some studies have shown video-based OGA are effective, determining clinically relevant indicators, such as the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID), is necessary to enhance its applicability in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physical Therapy Science","volume":"37 6","pages":"303-315"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12153243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physical Therapy Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.37.303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

[Purpose] This study aimed to conduct a systematic review the measurement properties of standardized observational gait analysis (OGA) tools for patients with stroke. [Participants and Methods] A systematically search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and PEDro databases using stroke- and gait-related keywords. No time restrictions were applied. Studies evaluating OGA using gait analysis tools were included. The methodological quality of the selected studies was assessed using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. [Results] A total of eighteen studies utilizing four gait analysis tools were identified. Sixteen studies employed video-based measurements. The GAIT and WGS tools were assessed for reliability, validity, responsiveness, and interpretability. However, the overall methodological quality of these assessments was not rated as high. [Conclusion] Video-based OGA holds significant potential for clinical applications, but several challenges remain to be met. Standardizing video recording protocols and measurement methods are essential and additional research is needed to determine the qualifications and expertise of the evaluators. Although some studies have shown video-based OGA are effective, determining clinically relevant indicators, such as the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID), is necessary to enhance its applicability in clinical practice.

脑卒中患者观察性步态分析的测量特性:一项系统综述。
【目的】本研究旨在对脑卒中患者标准化观察步态分析(OGA)工具的测量特性进行系统评价。[参与者和方法]使用卒中和步态相关关键词在PubMed、Cochrane Library和PEDro数据库中进行系统检索。没有时间限制。包括使用步态分析工具评估OGA的研究。所选研究的方法学质量采用COSMIN偏倚风险检查表进行评估。[结果]共有18项研究使用了四种步态分析工具。16项研究采用基于视频的测量方法。评估步态和WGS工具的可靠性、有效性、反应性和可解释性。然而,这些评估的总体方法学质量评价不高。[结论]基于视频的OGA具有巨大的临床应用潜力,但仍面临一些挑战。录像记录协议和测量方法的标准化是必不可少的,需要进一步的研究来确定评估人员的资格和专业知识。尽管一些研究表明基于视频的OGA是有效的,但确定临床相关指标,如最小临床重要差异(minimum clinical Important Difference, MCID),是提高其在临床实践中的适用性的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信