Development and validation of a perfused cadaveric model for neurovascular transradial access with insights from angiography and angioscopy.

IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Yigit Can Senol, Nishanth Krishnan, Mona Asghariahmadabad, Sarosh Irfan Madhani, Adrian Liu, Atakan Orscelik, Raghav Mattay, Woody Han, Matthew Robert Amans, Luis Savastano
{"title":"Development and validation of a perfused cadaveric model for neurovascular transradial access with insights from angiography and angioscopy.","authors":"Yigit Can Senol, Nishanth Krishnan, Mona Asghariahmadabad, Sarosh Irfan Madhani, Adrian Liu, Atakan Orscelik, Raghav Mattay, Woody Han, Matthew Robert Amans, Luis Savastano","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2025-023465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The development of safe and effective endovascular devices is dependent on accurate simulation of anticipated use environments during preclinical testing. We sought to optimize and evaluate the human 'live cadaver' neurovascular model for the purpose of testing radial access catheters. We aimed to assess the realism of our model during simulated neurointerventional procedures as well as explore and characterize potential challenges of radial access catheters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A human 'live cadaver' model was developed from a cadaveric specimen consisting of the head, neck, bilateral upper limbs, and thorax. Catheters were inserted into the heart and thoracic aorta. Blood-mimicking fluid made by 0.7% carboxymethyl cellulose + 0.25% sodium propionate was circulated through the vasculature using an external peristaltic pump. Bilateral radial access was obtained using 7F sheaths. Experienced neurointerventionists (n=5) were provided with a questionnaire using a validated 5-point Likert scale and tasked with assessing the model's radial artery, aortic arch, and carotid/vertebral arteries on the parameters of anatomical accuracy, roadmap angiography, device manipulation, haptic feedback, comparison to clinical cases, radio-opacity of devices, and overall similarity to actual patients. Challenging mechanisms were identified and described by evaluation of fluoroscopic and endoscopic videos.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of six cadavers were used. Formalin-fixed arteries showed mechanical properties comparable to those of fresh human arteries, including maximum stretch and increased tensile strength/stiffness. The contrast angiographies revealed no obstruction in the micro- or macro-vasculature. Overall similarity scores for arms (radial, brachial, axillary, and subclavian arteries) were 34.6±2.3 out of 40, for aortic arch 30.3±5.4 out of 40, and for carotid/vertebral artery access 33.0±4.2 out of 40. We identified three distinct challenges associated with market radial access catheters: (1) torque build-up followed by sudden release and whipping; (2) catheter tip entry into ulcerated or nodular aortic atheroma preventing free motion; and (3) catheter catching at a septum-like structure at the medial edge of the brachiocephalic trunk; the latter two result in herniation of the system into the arch even with favorable aortic arch angles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The model provided a reliable and accurate human radial and aortic vasculature simulation, allowing for the evaluation of catheter performance and identification of challenging mechanisms likely to occur in clinical settings. These findings suggest that the modified human live cadaveric model could be a valuable testing platform to support the development of next-generation transradial systems for improved clinical performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-023465","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The development of safe and effective endovascular devices is dependent on accurate simulation of anticipated use environments during preclinical testing. We sought to optimize and evaluate the human 'live cadaver' neurovascular model for the purpose of testing radial access catheters. We aimed to assess the realism of our model during simulated neurointerventional procedures as well as explore and characterize potential challenges of radial access catheters.

Methods: A human 'live cadaver' model was developed from a cadaveric specimen consisting of the head, neck, bilateral upper limbs, and thorax. Catheters were inserted into the heart and thoracic aorta. Blood-mimicking fluid made by 0.7% carboxymethyl cellulose + 0.25% sodium propionate was circulated through the vasculature using an external peristaltic pump. Bilateral radial access was obtained using 7F sheaths. Experienced neurointerventionists (n=5) were provided with a questionnaire using a validated 5-point Likert scale and tasked with assessing the model's radial artery, aortic arch, and carotid/vertebral arteries on the parameters of anatomical accuracy, roadmap angiography, device manipulation, haptic feedback, comparison to clinical cases, radio-opacity of devices, and overall similarity to actual patients. Challenging mechanisms were identified and described by evaluation of fluoroscopic and endoscopic videos.

Results: A total of six cadavers were used. Formalin-fixed arteries showed mechanical properties comparable to those of fresh human arteries, including maximum stretch and increased tensile strength/stiffness. The contrast angiographies revealed no obstruction in the micro- or macro-vasculature. Overall similarity scores for arms (radial, brachial, axillary, and subclavian arteries) were 34.6±2.3 out of 40, for aortic arch 30.3±5.4 out of 40, and for carotid/vertebral artery access 33.0±4.2 out of 40. We identified three distinct challenges associated with market radial access catheters: (1) torque build-up followed by sudden release and whipping; (2) catheter tip entry into ulcerated or nodular aortic atheroma preventing free motion; and (3) catheter catching at a septum-like structure at the medial edge of the brachiocephalic trunk; the latter two result in herniation of the system into the arch even with favorable aortic arch angles.

Conclusions: The model provided a reliable and accurate human radial and aortic vasculature simulation, allowing for the evaluation of catheter performance and identification of challenging mechanisms likely to occur in clinical settings. These findings suggest that the modified human live cadaveric model could be a valuable testing platform to support the development of next-generation transradial systems for improved clinical performance.

基于血管造影和血管镜检查的神经血管经桡动脉通路灌注尸体模型的开发和验证。
背景:安全有效的血管内装置的开发依赖于临床前试验中对预期使用环境的准确模拟。我们试图优化和评估人类“活尸体”神经血管模型,以测试径向通路导管。我们的目的是在模拟神经介入过程中评估我们的模型的现实性,以及探索和表征径向通路导管的潜在挑战。方法:以尸体标本为基础,由头部、颈部、双侧上肢和胸部组成,建立人体“活体尸体”模型。导管插入心脏和胸主动脉。采用外蠕动泵将0.7%羧甲基纤维素+ 0.25%丙酸钠制成的模拟血液液通过血管循环。采用7F护套获得双侧桡骨通路。经验丰富的神经介入医师(n=5)使用经过验证的李克特5分量表进行问卷调查,评估模型的桡动脉、主动脉弓和颈动脉/椎动脉的解剖准确性、路线图血管造影、设备操作、触觉反馈、与临床病例的比较、设备的放射不透明度以及与实际患者的总体相似性。通过评估透视和内窥镜视频,确定并描述了具有挑战性的机制。结果:共使用尸体6具。福尔马林固定动脉显示出与新鲜人体动脉相当的机械性能,包括最大拉伸和增加的拉伸强度/刚度。血管造影显示微血管或大血管未见阻塞。手臂(桡动脉、肱动脉、腋窝动脉和锁骨下动脉)的总体相似度评分为34.6±2.3分(满分40分),主动脉弓为30.3±5.4分(满分40分),颈动脉/椎动脉通路为33.0±4.2分(满分40分)。我们确定了市场上与径向导管相关的三个不同的挑战:(1)扭矩积累,然后突然释放和鞭动;(2)导管尖端进入溃疡性或结节性主动脉粥样硬化,阻止自由运动;(3)导管在头臂干内侧边缘的隔膜样结构处捕获;后两者导致系统突出到弓,即使有良好的主动脉弓角度。结论:该模型提供了一个可靠和准确的人体桡动脉和主动脉血管模拟,允许评估导管性能和识别在临床环境中可能发生的具有挑战性的机制。这些发现表明,改良的人类活体尸体模型可以作为一个有价值的测试平台,支持下一代经桡动脉系统的开发,以提高临床表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信