Effectiveness Analysis of Sevoflurane Combined with Propofol or Remimazolam Anesthesia in Pediatric Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair and Its Impact on Hemodynamics and Postoperative Pain.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Journal of Investigative Surgery Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-12 DOI:10.1080/08941939.2025.2500438
Renqi Liu, Zhiyi Wang, Yuanyuan Meng, Weiye Chen, Min Zhou
{"title":"Effectiveness Analysis of Sevoflurane Combined with Propofol or Remimazolam Anesthesia in Pediatric Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair and Its Impact on Hemodynamics and Postoperative Pain.","authors":"Renqi Liu, Zhiyi Wang, Yuanyuan Meng, Weiye Chen, Min Zhou","doi":"10.1080/08941939.2025.2500438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the clinical effectiveness of combined treatment of sevoflurane with propofol or remimazolam in decreasing hemodynamic changes and postoperative pain in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study prospectively recruited 287 children with hernia admitted to our hospital from September 2020 to October 2023. These children were allocated into the sevoflurane plus remimazolam and sevoflurane plus propofol groups using the random number table method. General clinical data at admission were collected. Clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. The primary outcomes included anesthesia quality, intraoperative hemodynamic indicators at different time points (MAP, SpO<sub>2</sub>, HR), and the postoperative FLACC score, while the secondary outcomes included the PAED score of the children and the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No remarkable difference occurred between these two groups regarding general clinical data. Compared to the sevoflurane plus propofol group, the sevoflurane plus remimazolam group resulted in significantly lower MAP and HR at T1, T2, T3, and T4 (<i>p</i> < .05), shorter postoperative awakening time (mean difference: 2.9 min, <i>p</i> < .01), lower FLACC pain scores at 0.5, 1, and 2 h postoperatively (<i>p</i> < .05), and lower PAED scores at 5, 15, and 30 min postoperatively (<i>p</i> < .05). Adverse effects were lower in the sevoflurane + remimazolam group (5% vs. 12%, <i>p</i> = .076).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sevoflurane plus remimazolam in children receiving LIHR has minimal impact on hemodynamics, reduces pain levels within 4 h postoperatively, lowers PAED and agitation scores, and demonstrates high safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":16200,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","volume":"38 1","pages":"2500438"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2025.2500438","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the clinical effectiveness of combined treatment of sevoflurane with propofol or remimazolam in decreasing hemodynamic changes and postoperative pain in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR).

Methods: This study prospectively recruited 287 children with hernia admitted to our hospital from September 2020 to October 2023. These children were allocated into the sevoflurane plus remimazolam and sevoflurane plus propofol groups using the random number table method. General clinical data at admission were collected. Clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. The primary outcomes included anesthesia quality, intraoperative hemodynamic indicators at different time points (MAP, SpO2, HR), and the postoperative FLACC score, while the secondary outcomes included the PAED score of the children and the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions.

Results: No remarkable difference occurred between these two groups regarding general clinical data. Compared to the sevoflurane plus propofol group, the sevoflurane plus remimazolam group resulted in significantly lower MAP and HR at T1, T2, T3, and T4 (p < .05), shorter postoperative awakening time (mean difference: 2.9 min, p < .01), lower FLACC pain scores at 0.5, 1, and 2 h postoperatively (p < .05), and lower PAED scores at 5, 15, and 30 min postoperatively (p < .05). Adverse effects were lower in the sevoflurane + remimazolam group (5% vs. 12%, p = .076).

Conclusion: Sevoflurane plus remimazolam in children receiving LIHR has minimal impact on hemodynamics, reduces pain levels within 4 h postoperatively, lowers PAED and agitation scores, and demonstrates high safety.

七氟醚联合异丙酚或雷马唑仑麻醉在小儿腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效分析及对血流动力学和术后疼痛的影响。
目的:本研究评价七氟醚联合异丙酚或雷马唑仑治疗小儿腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(LIHR)患者血流动力学改变和术后疼痛的临床效果。方法:本研究前瞻性招募2020年9月至2023年10月在我院住院的287例疝患儿。采用随机数字表法将这些儿童分为七氟醚加雷马唑仑组和七氟醚加异丙酚组。收集入院时的一般临床资料。比较两组患者的临床结果。主要结局包括麻醉质量、术中不同时间点血流动力学指标(MAP、SpO2、HR)及术后FLACC评分,次要结局包括患儿PAED评分及术后不良反应发生率。结果:两组一般临床资料无显著差异。与七氟醚加异丙酚组相比,七氟醚加雷马唑仑组在T1、T2、T3和T4时MAP和HR显著降低(p p p p p = 0.076)。结论:七氟醚加雷马唑仑对LIHR患儿血流动力学影响最小,术后4 h内疼痛水平降低,PAED和躁动评分降低,安全性高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Investigative Surgery publishes peer-reviewed scientific articles for the advancement of surgery, to the ultimate benefit of patient care and rehabilitation. It is the only journal that encompasses the individual and collaborative efforts of scientists in human and veterinary medicine, dentistry, basic and applied sciences, engineering, and law and ethics. The journal is dedicated to the publication of outstanding articles of interest to the surgical research community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信