Eastern oysters alter inducible defense mechanism of shell strengthening with age.

IF 2.8 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Journal of Experimental Biology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-07 DOI:10.1242/jeb.250143
Sarah H Roney, Gary H Dickinson, Benjamin A Belgrad, Marc J Weissburg
{"title":"Eastern oysters alter inducible defense mechanism of shell strengthening with age.","authors":"Sarah H Roney, Gary H Dickinson, Benjamin A Belgrad, Marc J Weissburg","doi":"10.1242/jeb.250143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Eastern oysters, Crassostrea virginica, use inducible defenses in the form of strengthened shells to reduce their risk of predation. Inducible defenses often have trade-offs between the costs and benefits associated with the organism's fitness, as developing defenses requires energetic resources. Shell strength is a product of the amount of material laid by the animal (thickness) and the material properties of the shell (e.g. hardness and fracture resistance). Previous studies have suggested that oysters may trade off between shell thickness or shell hardness as a mechanism for increasing shell strength against predation, which are hypothesized to have different energetic requirements. The present study analyzed the shell structural (thickness of composite layers) and micromechanical properties (microhardness and crack propagation tested within individual shell layers) of predator-induced and non-induced juvenile oysters at 4 and 8 weeks post-settlement to determine which shell strengthening mechanism oysters use in response to predator cues. Younger juveniles did not display any significant differences in micromechanical shell properties or shell thickness as a result of induction, though some marginal differences were detected. In contrast, older juveniles use a combination of increased hardness and thickness in shell defense, where induced oysters were 33% thicker overall and 12% harder within their outer prismatic layer. This suggests that oysters alter shell strength using multiple defense mechanisms depending on age, and we postulate that animals switch mechanisms when necessary to balance the advantages and associated costs of defense with an individual's physiological needs for growth.</p>","PeriodicalId":15786,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.250143","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Eastern oysters, Crassostrea virginica, use inducible defenses in the form of strengthened shells to reduce their risk of predation. Inducible defenses often have trade-offs between the costs and benefits associated with the organism's fitness, as developing defenses requires energetic resources. Shell strength is a product of the amount of material laid by the animal (thickness) and the material properties of the shell (e.g. hardness and fracture resistance). Previous studies have suggested that oysters may trade off between shell thickness or shell hardness as a mechanism for increasing shell strength against predation, which are hypothesized to have different energetic requirements. The present study analyzed the shell structural (thickness of composite layers) and micromechanical properties (microhardness and crack propagation tested within individual shell layers) of predator-induced and non-induced juvenile oysters at 4 and 8 weeks post-settlement to determine which shell strengthening mechanism oysters use in response to predator cues. Younger juveniles did not display any significant differences in micromechanical shell properties or shell thickness as a result of induction, though some marginal differences were detected. In contrast, older juveniles use a combination of increased hardness and thickness in shell defense, where induced oysters were 33% thicker overall and 12% harder within their outer prismatic layer. This suggests that oysters alter shell strength using multiple defense mechanisms depending on age, and we postulate that animals switch mechanisms when necessary to balance the advantages and associated costs of defense with an individual's physiological needs for growth.

随着年龄的增长,牡蛎壳强化的诱导防御机制发生了改变。
东方牡蛎(Crassostrea virginica)利用强化壳的诱导防御来降低被捕食的风险。由于发展防御需要能量资源,诱导防御通常在与生物体适应性相关的成本和收益之间进行权衡。外壳强度是动物铺设的材料量(厚度)和外壳的材料性能(例如硬度和抗断裂性)的乘积。以前的研究表明,牡蛎可能在壳厚度或壳硬度之间进行权衡,作为增加壳强度以抵御捕食的机制,这被假设有不同的能量需求。本研究分析了捕食者诱导和非诱导幼牡蛎在沉降后4周和8周的壳结构(复合层厚度)和微力学性能(单个壳层内的显微硬度和裂纹扩展测试),以确定牡蛎对捕食者线索的反应中使用哪种壳强化机制。较年轻的幼鱼在微力学壳特性或壳厚度上没有表现出任何显著差异,尽管检测到一些边际差异。相比之下,年龄较大的幼牡蛎在外壳防御中使用硬度和厚度增加的组合,其中诱导牡蛎的整体厚度增加33%,外层棱柱层的硬度增加12%。这表明牡蛎根据年龄使用多种防御机制改变壳的强度,我们假设动物在必要时切换机制,以平衡防御的优势和相关成本与个体生长的生理需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Experimental Biology is the leading primary research journal in comparative physiology and publishes papers on the form and function of living organisms at all levels of biological organisation, from the molecular and subcellular to the integrated whole animal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信