Lost in translation: are doctors really answering patients' questions about in vitro fertilization?

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Naveena R Daram, Malika L Day, Molly J Herr, Rose A Maxwell, Meghan C Ozcan
{"title":"Lost in translation: are doctors really answering patients' questions about in vitro fertilization?","authors":"Naveena R Daram, Malika L Day, Molly J Herr, Rose A Maxwell, Meghan C Ozcan","doi":"10.1007/s10815-025-03538-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>As social media grows as a health resource, IVF patients turn to Facebook and Reddit for guidance, while providers share educational content on TikTok and Instagram. This study examines the alignment between patient inquiries and provider content to identify gaps in digital fertility education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional qualitative analysis collected 50 top patient posts from five largest IVF Facebook and Reddit groups and 50 provider videos from Instagram and TikTok using popular IVF hashtags. Posts and videos were categorized into ten themes, engagement metrics analyzed, and provider content assessed for readability. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests for content distribution and independent t-tests and one-way ANOVA for readability differences (p < 0.05 considered significant).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant discrepancies were observed between patient inquiries and provider content. Patients most frequently inquired about medications, diagnostic testing, side effects, and emotional support-topics underrepresented in provider content. Providers disproportionately focused on procedural details (34.09% vs. 6.17%, p < 0.001). Readability analysis showed provider content exceeded the AMA-recommended 6th-grade reading level (range: 7.93-15.29). Despite misalignment, engagement with IVF-related content was high, with millions of views, likes, and comments across platforms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is misalignment between what patients ask and what providers discuss on social media. Providers aiming content at patients should address patient priorities both online and in clinical practice while improving readability to enhance digital health literacy. Given the vast reach of social media, fertility specialists should consider establishing a presence to educate and engage with patients effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03538-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: As social media grows as a health resource, IVF patients turn to Facebook and Reddit for guidance, while providers share educational content on TikTok and Instagram. This study examines the alignment between patient inquiries and provider content to identify gaps in digital fertility education.

Methods: A cross-sectional qualitative analysis collected 50 top patient posts from five largest IVF Facebook and Reddit groups and 50 provider videos from Instagram and TikTok using popular IVF hashtags. Posts and videos were categorized into ten themes, engagement metrics analyzed, and provider content assessed for readability. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests for content distribution and independent t-tests and one-way ANOVA for readability differences (p < 0.05 considered significant).

Results: Significant discrepancies were observed between patient inquiries and provider content. Patients most frequently inquired about medications, diagnostic testing, side effects, and emotional support-topics underrepresented in provider content. Providers disproportionately focused on procedural details (34.09% vs. 6.17%, p < 0.001). Readability analysis showed provider content exceeded the AMA-recommended 6th-grade reading level (range: 7.93-15.29). Despite misalignment, engagement with IVF-related content was high, with millions of views, likes, and comments across platforms.

Conclusions: There is misalignment between what patients ask and what providers discuss on social media. Providers aiming content at patients should address patient priorities both online and in clinical practice while improving readability to enhance digital health literacy. Given the vast reach of social media, fertility specialists should consider establishing a presence to educate and engage with patients effectively.

迷失在翻译中:医生真的在回答病人关于体外受精的问题吗?
目的:随着社交媒体作为一种健康资源的发展,试管婴儿患者转向Facebook和Reddit寻求指导,而提供者在TikTok和Instagram上分享教育内容。本研究考察了患者咨询和提供者内容之间的一致性,以确定数字生育教育中的差距。方法:横断面定性分析收集了来自五个最大的试管婴儿Facebook和Reddit群组的50个顶级患者帖子,以及来自Instagram和TikTok的50个提供者视频,使用流行的试管婴儿标签。文章和视频被分为10个主题,参与指标进行分析,并评估提供商内容的可读性。统计分析包括内容分布的卡方检验和可读性差异的独立t检验和单因素方差分析(p)。结果:患者询问和提供者内容之间存在显著差异。患者最常询问的是药物、诊断测试、副作用和情感支持,而这些问题在医疗服务提供者的内容中未得到充分体现。结论:患者的要求和医生在社交媒体上的讨论之间存在不一致。以患者为目标的内容提供者应在网上和临床实践中解决患者的优先事项,同时提高可读性,以提高数字卫生素养。鉴于社交媒体的广泛影响,生育专家应该考虑建立一个有效的教育和参与患者的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
286
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species. The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信