An experimental test of the importance of isolated trees for frog diversity in tropical landscapes.

IF 3.5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Mauricio Almeida-Gomes, Andreza Soares de Siqueira, Vitor Nelson Teixeira Borges-Júnior, Maria Anita Tozzi, Rodrigo da Fonseca da Silva, Marcus Vinícius Vieira, Jayme Augusto Prevedello
{"title":"An experimental test of the importance of isolated trees for frog diversity in tropical landscapes.","authors":"Mauricio Almeida-Gomes, Andreza Soares de Siqueira, Vitor Nelson Teixeira Borges-Júnior, Maria Anita Tozzi, Rodrigo da Fonseca da Silva, Marcus Vinícius Vieira, Jayme Augusto Prevedello","doi":"10.1111/1365-2656.70081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Isolated trees are conspicuous in fragmented landscapes and are often considered 'keystone structures', due to their significant ecological role despite occupying small areas. They are also regarded as 'biodiversity foci', because they may support higher abundance and species richness than nearby open areas. However, these suggestions have not been tested experimentally yet. Using experimental ponds and amphibians as a model system, we tested the importance of isolated trees for biological communities in a biodiversity hotspot, the Atlantic Forest. We built and sampled 28 artificial ponds, 10 near the edge of a continuous forest, nine beneath isolated trees and nine in open pasture. To test for differences in amphibian community structure among experimental treatments, we quantified community abundance, local species richness and community composition. We also tested whether the abundance of the four numerically dominant species in the ponds (Physalaemus signifer, Leptodactylus latrans, Rhinella ornata and Scinax aff. x-signatus) differed among treatments. Finally, we compared total (landscape-level) species richness among treatments. Ponds located beneath isolated trees and near forest edges had a higher community abundance and abundance of P. signifer and R. ornata, as well as a higher total (landscape-level) species richness than ponds located in open pasture. Ponds beneath isolated trees had a similar community composition to ponds near the edge of the continuous forest, whereas open pasture communities had a markedly different community composition. Our results provide experimental evidence that isolated trees contribute to increase total (landscape-level) species richness and community abundance of anurans in ponds in deforested areas, making local communities more similar to those found near forest edges. We recommend protecting and planting isolated trees across deforested areas, particularly near natural ponds, as well as restoring ponds near isolated trees. These relatively low-cost actions can contribute substantially to increasing the abundance and species richness of anuran communities in fragmented landscapes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Ecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.70081","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Isolated trees are conspicuous in fragmented landscapes and are often considered 'keystone structures', due to their significant ecological role despite occupying small areas. They are also regarded as 'biodiversity foci', because they may support higher abundance and species richness than nearby open areas. However, these suggestions have not been tested experimentally yet. Using experimental ponds and amphibians as a model system, we tested the importance of isolated trees for biological communities in a biodiversity hotspot, the Atlantic Forest. We built and sampled 28 artificial ponds, 10 near the edge of a continuous forest, nine beneath isolated trees and nine in open pasture. To test for differences in amphibian community structure among experimental treatments, we quantified community abundance, local species richness and community composition. We also tested whether the abundance of the four numerically dominant species in the ponds (Physalaemus signifer, Leptodactylus latrans, Rhinella ornata and Scinax aff. x-signatus) differed among treatments. Finally, we compared total (landscape-level) species richness among treatments. Ponds located beneath isolated trees and near forest edges had a higher community abundance and abundance of P. signifer and R. ornata, as well as a higher total (landscape-level) species richness than ponds located in open pasture. Ponds beneath isolated trees had a similar community composition to ponds near the edge of the continuous forest, whereas open pasture communities had a markedly different community composition. Our results provide experimental evidence that isolated trees contribute to increase total (landscape-level) species richness and community abundance of anurans in ponds in deforested areas, making local communities more similar to those found near forest edges. We recommend protecting and planting isolated trees across deforested areas, particularly near natural ponds, as well as restoring ponds near isolated trees. These relatively low-cost actions can contribute substantially to increasing the abundance and species richness of anuran communities in fragmented landscapes.

热带景观中孤立树木对青蛙多样性重要性的实验测试。
孤立的树木在破碎的景观中很显眼,通常被认为是“基石结构”,尽管它们占据的面积很小,但却具有重要的生态作用。它们也被视为“生物多样性焦点”,因为它们可能比附近的开阔地区拥有更高的丰度和物种丰富度。然而,这些建议还没有经过实验检验。我们以实验池塘和两栖动物为模型系统,测试了大西洋森林生物多样性热点地区孤立树木对生物群落的重要性。我们建造并取样了28个人工池塘,10个靠近连续森林的边缘,9个在孤立的树下,9个在开阔的牧场上。为了检验不同处理间两栖动物群落结构的差异,我们量化了群落丰度、本地物种丰富度和群落组成。我们还测试了4种数量优势物种(Physalaemus signifer, Leptodactylus latrans, Rhinella ornata和sinax affs . x-signatus)在不同处理下的丰度是否存在差异。最后,我们比较了不同处理的物种丰富度。孤立树下和林缘的池塘群落丰度、象征小檗和花小檗的丰度、总物种丰富度(景观水平)均高于开阔牧场的池塘。孤立树下池塘的群落组成与连续林边缘池塘相似,而开放牧场群落的群落组成明显不同。我们的研究结果提供了实验证据,表明孤立的树木有助于增加森林砍伐地区池塘中无尾动物的物种丰富度和群落丰富度,使当地群落更接近森林边缘。我们建议在森林砍伐地区保护和种植孤立的树木,特别是在天然池塘附近,以及恢复孤立树木附近的池塘。这些相对低成本的行动可以大大有助于增加破碎景观中无尾猿群落的丰度和物种丰富度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Animal Ecology
Journal of Animal Ecology 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
188
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Animal Ecology publishes the best original research on all aspects of animal ecology, ranging from the molecular to the ecosystem level. These may be field, laboratory and theoretical studies utilising terrestrial, freshwater or marine systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信