{"title":"Treatment patterns and blood count control in 10,112 patients with polycythemia vera.","authors":"Naveen Pemmaraju, Jingbo Yu, Anupama Vasudevan, Husain Qureshi, Evan Braunstein, Aleksander Chojecki","doi":"10.1080/17474086.2025.2520316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elevated blood counts in polycythemia vera (PV) are associated with increased thrombotic risk, which contributes to morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This retrospective study describes treatment patterns and blood count control in patients with PV managed at community oncology practices (January 2014-February 2023; Integra Precision Q database).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total 10,112 patients, most received phlebotomy (68.1%) or hydroxyurea (HU; 28.2%) as initial treatment, with median follow-up of 32.1 (IQR, 13.5-58.5) months and 31.5 (IQR, 16.8-54.9) months, respectively. Changing treatment was less common than remaining on initial treatment despite 67.8% of patients on phlebotomy and 30.4% on HU having elevated hematocrit (≥45%) after 1 year of treatment. In contrast, 85.4% of patients who switched to ruxolitinib from HU achieved hematocrit < 45% after 1 year, and fewer required phlebotomy during ruxolitinib treatment than with HU treatment (RUX, 29.3%; HU, 53.5%). Additionally, 54.2% of patients who switched to ruxolitinib achieved white blood cell counts < 11 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L, and 57.5% achieved platelet counts ≤ 400 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L after 1 year of ruxolitinib treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This real-world evidence highlights the importance of considering alternative therapies for patients whose initial treatment regimen does not provide adequate clinical benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":12325,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"529-536"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2025.2520316","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Elevated blood counts in polycythemia vera (PV) are associated with increased thrombotic risk, which contributes to morbidity and mortality.
Research design and methods: This retrospective study describes treatment patterns and blood count control in patients with PV managed at community oncology practices (January 2014-February 2023; Integra Precision Q database).
Results: Of a total 10,112 patients, most received phlebotomy (68.1%) or hydroxyurea (HU; 28.2%) as initial treatment, with median follow-up of 32.1 (IQR, 13.5-58.5) months and 31.5 (IQR, 16.8-54.9) months, respectively. Changing treatment was less common than remaining on initial treatment despite 67.8% of patients on phlebotomy and 30.4% on HU having elevated hematocrit (≥45%) after 1 year of treatment. In contrast, 85.4% of patients who switched to ruxolitinib from HU achieved hematocrit < 45% after 1 year, and fewer required phlebotomy during ruxolitinib treatment than with HU treatment (RUX, 29.3%; HU, 53.5%). Additionally, 54.2% of patients who switched to ruxolitinib achieved white blood cell counts < 11 × 109/L, and 57.5% achieved platelet counts ≤ 400 × 109/L after 1 year of ruxolitinib treatment.
Conclusions: This real-world evidence highlights the importance of considering alternative therapies for patients whose initial treatment regimen does not provide adequate clinical benefit.
期刊介绍:
Advanced molecular research techniques have transformed hematology in recent years. With improved understanding of hematologic diseases, we now have the opportunity to research and evaluate new biological therapies, new drugs and drug combinations, new treatment schedules and novel approaches including stem cell transplantation. We can also expect proteomics, molecular genetics and biomarker research to facilitate new diagnostic approaches and the identification of appropriate therapies. Further advances in our knowledge regarding the formation and function of blood cells and blood-forming tissues should ensue, and it will be a major challenge for hematologists to adopt these new paradigms and develop integrated strategies to define the best possible patient care. Expert Review of Hematology (1747-4086) puts these advances in context and explores how they will translate directly into clinical practice.