Risk Factors for Stricture After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Large Rectal Neoplasms.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Daniel T Rezende, Fabio S Kawaguti, Cintia M S Kimura, Caio S R Nahas, Rodrigo A Pinto, Adriana V Safatle-Ribeiro, Fauze Maluf-Filho, Ulysses Ribeiro-Junior, Sergio C Nahas, Carlos F S Marques
{"title":"Risk Factors for Stricture After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Large Rectal Neoplasms.","authors":"Daniel T Rezende, Fabio S Kawaguti, Cintia M S Kimura, Caio S R Nahas, Rodrigo A Pinto, Adriana V Safatle-Ribeiro, Fauze Maluf-Filho, Ulysses Ribeiro-Junior, Sergio C Nahas, Carlos F S Marques","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While acute adverse events after endoscopic submucosal dissection, such as perforation and bleeding, are well-documented, studies on stricture are scarce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to identify risk factors for rectal stricture and symptomatic stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection, and to evaluate patient outcomes in a Western tertiary cancer center.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center retrospective study from a prospectively collected database of rectal endoscopic submucosal dissections.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Reference cancer center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neoplasms from July 2010 to January 2020. Exclusion criteria were incomplete resections, referral for low anterior resection, proximal diversions (symptomatic group), and loss to follow-up. A specific follow-up protocol was established for patients with lesions occupying more than 90% of the rectal circumference.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Rectal strictures were classified as complete or partial.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes measures: </strong>Assessment of risk factors for stricture after rectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 109 rectal lesions resected, 94 cases were included. Twenty patients (21,3%) developed stricture (thirteen complete and seven partial stricture). Univariate analysis identified distance from the anal verge< 5 cm, larger size and circumferential mucosal defect >90% as significantly associated with stricture (p < 0.05). On multivariable analysis showed that only circumferential mucosal defect ≥90% was significantly associated with stricture (p < 0.001). None of the patients with partial stricture were symptomatic, while eleven out of thirteen with complete stricture were symptomatic. All symptomatic patients underwent serial dilations, with balloon or digitally, with symptom resolution within 1 to 8 months (mean of 7.8 sessions of dilation procedures).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Single-center retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Circumferential mucosal defect ≥90% was the only significant risk factor for stricture after extensive rectal endoscopic submucosal dissection procedures on multivariable analysis. All patients with symptomatic stricture were successfully treated with dilation sessions. See Video Abstract.</p>","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003827","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While acute adverse events after endoscopic submucosal dissection, such as perforation and bleeding, are well-documented, studies on stricture are scarce.

Objective: This study aims to identify risk factors for rectal stricture and symptomatic stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection, and to evaluate patient outcomes in a Western tertiary cancer center.

Design: Single-center retrospective study from a prospectively collected database of rectal endoscopic submucosal dissections.

Settings: Reference cancer center.

Patients: Patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neoplasms from July 2010 to January 2020. Exclusion criteria were incomplete resections, referral for low anterior resection, proximal diversions (symptomatic group), and loss to follow-up. A specific follow-up protocol was established for patients with lesions occupying more than 90% of the rectal circumference.

Interventions: Rectal strictures were classified as complete or partial.

Main outcomes measures: Assessment of risk factors for stricture after rectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Results: Of 109 rectal lesions resected, 94 cases were included. Twenty patients (21,3%) developed stricture (thirteen complete and seven partial stricture). Univariate analysis identified distance from the anal verge< 5 cm, larger size and circumferential mucosal defect >90% as significantly associated with stricture (p < 0.05). On multivariable analysis showed that only circumferential mucosal defect ≥90% was significantly associated with stricture (p < 0.001). None of the patients with partial stricture were symptomatic, while eleven out of thirteen with complete stricture were symptomatic. All symptomatic patients underwent serial dilations, with balloon or digitally, with symptom resolution within 1 to 8 months (mean of 7.8 sessions of dilation procedures).

Limitations: Single-center retrospective study.

Conclusions: Circumferential mucosal defect ≥90% was the only significant risk factor for stricture after extensive rectal endoscopic submucosal dissection procedures on multivariable analysis. All patients with symptomatic stricture were successfully treated with dilation sessions. See Video Abstract.

内镜下大直肠肿瘤粘膜下剥离后狭窄的危险因素。
背景:虽然内镜下粘膜下剥离后的急性不良事件,如穿孔和出血,有充分的文献记载,但对狭窄的研究很少。目的:本研究旨在确定内镜下粘膜下剥离后直肠狭窄和症状性狭窄的危险因素,并评估西方三级癌症中心患者的预后。设计:从前瞻性收集的直肠内镜下粘膜夹层数据库中进行单中心回顾性研究。设置:参考癌症中心。患者:2010年7月至2020年1月行直肠肿瘤内镜下粘膜下剥离术的患者。排除标准为不完全切除、转诊前低位切除、近端转移(症状组)和无随访。对于病变占直肠周长90%以上的患者,建立了特定的随访方案。干预措施:直肠狭窄分为完全或部分狭窄。主要观察指标:评估直肠内镜下粘膜下剥离术后狭窄的危险因素。结果:109例直肠病变切除94例。20例(21.3%)出现狭窄(完全狭窄13例,部分狭窄7例)。单因素分析发现,距离肛门边缘< 5 cm,较大的尺寸和周围粘膜缺损>90%与狭窄显著相关(p < 0.05)。多变量分析显示,只有周围粘膜缺损≥90%与狭窄显著相关(p < 0.001)。部分狭窄患者无症状,13例完全狭窄患者中有11例有症状。所有有症状的患者都进行了连续扩张,用球囊或数字技术,在1至8个月内症状消退(平均7.8次扩张手术)。局限性:单中心回顾性研究。结论:经多变量分析,环周粘膜缺损≥90%是直肠内镜下广泛粘膜下剥离手术后狭窄的唯一显著危险因素。所有有症状性狭窄的患者都成功地进行了扩张治疗。参见视频摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
572
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (DCR) is the official journal of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) dedicated to advancing the knowledge of intestinal disorders by providing a forum for communication amongst their members. The journal features timely editorials, original contributions and technical notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信