Adrian M H de Bruyn, Jordana L Van Geest, Jennifer C Arens, Jennifer S Ings, Nick A Manklow, Kevin V Brix, Mariah C Arnold
{"title":"Calibration of a laboratory-based chronic toxicity model to nickel effects on stream invertebrates in the field.","authors":"Adrian M H de Bruyn, Jordana L Van Geest, Jennifer C Arens, Jennifer S Ings, Nick A Manklow, Kevin V Brix, Mariah C Arnold","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Predicting effects of metals on stream invertebrate communities can be hindered by spatial and temporal variation in toxicity modifying factors, a paucity of laboratory toxicity data for stream taxa (mainly insects), and variation in benthic invertebrate community structure related to habitat and factors other than the stressor of interest. We addressed these challenges by combining laboratory-based chronic toxicity data with field-based biological monitoring data to build a lab-to-field stressor-response relationship. A laboratory-based toxicity model for Ceriodaphnia dubia was used to translate field nickel (Ni) concentrations into predicted toxicity, and a quantile regression model of field data from a mine-affected watershed was then used to describe the limiting effect of Ni toxicity on the benthic invertebrate community. Many taxa showed no evidence of Ni effects up to the highest studied exposure (30 µg/L dissolved Ni, or 92% effect to C. dubia reproduction). The most sensitive metric was percent Ephemeroptera, reflecting declines in abundance of some sensitive mayflies (e.g., Baetis, Epeorus) and concurrent increases in abundance of some tolerant non-mayfly taxa (e.g., Rheocricotopus, Eukiefferiella) across the gradient of Ni toxicity in the field. The field EC10 for percent Ephemeroptera occurred at a 22% effect of Ni to C. dubia reproduction. This finding supports previous estimates of 20% as a critical effect size in laboratory test organisms that could be predictive of discernible effects on sensitive invertebrates in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf159","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Predicting effects of metals on stream invertebrate communities can be hindered by spatial and temporal variation in toxicity modifying factors, a paucity of laboratory toxicity data for stream taxa (mainly insects), and variation in benthic invertebrate community structure related to habitat and factors other than the stressor of interest. We addressed these challenges by combining laboratory-based chronic toxicity data with field-based biological monitoring data to build a lab-to-field stressor-response relationship. A laboratory-based toxicity model for Ceriodaphnia dubia was used to translate field nickel (Ni) concentrations into predicted toxicity, and a quantile regression model of field data from a mine-affected watershed was then used to describe the limiting effect of Ni toxicity on the benthic invertebrate community. Many taxa showed no evidence of Ni effects up to the highest studied exposure (30 µg/L dissolved Ni, or 92% effect to C. dubia reproduction). The most sensitive metric was percent Ephemeroptera, reflecting declines in abundance of some sensitive mayflies (e.g., Baetis, Epeorus) and concurrent increases in abundance of some tolerant non-mayfly taxa (e.g., Rheocricotopus, Eukiefferiella) across the gradient of Ni toxicity in the field. The field EC10 for percent Ephemeroptera occurred at a 22% effect of Ni to C. dubia reproduction. This finding supports previous estimates of 20% as a critical effect size in laboratory test organisms that could be predictive of discernible effects on sensitive invertebrates in the field.
期刊介绍:
The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...]
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.