Minimally invasive surgery in advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer: current evidence and future directions.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Current Opinion in Oncology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-05 DOI:10.1097/CCO.0000000000001162
Nuria Agusti, Karla Barajas, J Alejandro Rauh-Hain
{"title":"Minimally invasive surgery in advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer: current evidence and future directions.","authors":"Nuria Agusti, Karla Barajas, J Alejandro Rauh-Hain","doi":"10.1097/CCO.0000000000001162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in advanced ovarian cancer management following neoadjuvant chemotherapy yields potential benefits in patient recovery and quality of life compared with traditional open surgery. MIS techniques, including robot-assisted procedures, have been increasingly utilized in recent years despite ongoing debates about their oncologic safety.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent prospective and retrospective studies indicate that MIS for interval debulking after neoadjuvant chemotherapy can achieve similar cytoreductive outcomes (no visible residual disease, CC-0) to laparotomy in carefully selected patients. Key reported advantages include reduced perioperative morbidity, lower blood loss, and shorter hospital stays. Nonetheless, current data are limited by patient selection bias, power of the studies to detect differences, and concerns about accurately detecting small-volume disease laparoscopically. Ongoing randomized controlled trials, such as the LANCE trial, are expected to provide robust evidence to clarify oncologic outcomes of MIS. Additionally, early studies indicate MIS might be feasible for selected cases of recurrent ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>MIS is emerging as a viable and potentially advantageous alternative to open surgery for advanced ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, provided careful patient selection and surgical expertise. Definitive conclusions about long-term oncologic outcomes and recurrence require results from randomized clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":10893,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"478-486"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337635/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000001162","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: The use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in advanced ovarian cancer management following neoadjuvant chemotherapy yields potential benefits in patient recovery and quality of life compared with traditional open surgery. MIS techniques, including robot-assisted procedures, have been increasingly utilized in recent years despite ongoing debates about their oncologic safety.

Recent findings: Recent prospective and retrospective studies indicate that MIS for interval debulking after neoadjuvant chemotherapy can achieve similar cytoreductive outcomes (no visible residual disease, CC-0) to laparotomy in carefully selected patients. Key reported advantages include reduced perioperative morbidity, lower blood loss, and shorter hospital stays. Nonetheless, current data are limited by patient selection bias, power of the studies to detect differences, and concerns about accurately detecting small-volume disease laparoscopically. Ongoing randomized controlled trials, such as the LANCE trial, are expected to provide robust evidence to clarify oncologic outcomes of MIS. Additionally, early studies indicate MIS might be feasible for selected cases of recurrent ovarian cancer.

Summary: MIS is emerging as a viable and potentially advantageous alternative to open surgery for advanced ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, provided careful patient selection and surgical expertise. Definitive conclusions about long-term oncologic outcomes and recurrence require results from randomized clinical trials.

晚期和复发性卵巢癌的微创手术:目前的证据和未来的方向。
回顾目的:与传统开放手术相比,微创手术(MIS)在晚期卵巢癌新辅助化疗后的治疗在患者恢复和生活质量方面具有潜在的优势。MIS技术,包括机器人辅助手术,近年来越来越多地使用,尽管关于其肿瘤安全性的争论仍在继续。最近的发现:最近的前瞻性和回顾性研究表明,在精心挑选的患者中,MIS用于新辅助化疗后的间歇减积可以达到与开腹手术相似的细胞减少结果(无可见残留疾病,CC-0)。报道的主要优势包括减少围手术期发病率、减少失血和缩短住院时间。然而,目前的数据受到患者选择偏倚、研究发现差异的能力以及对腹腔镜准确检测小体积疾病的关注的限制。正在进行的随机对照试验,如LANCE试验,有望提供有力的证据来阐明MIS的肿瘤学结果。此外,早期研究表明MIS可能适用于某些复发性卵巢癌病例。总结:在新辅助化疗后的晚期卵巢癌患者选择和手术专业知识的支持下,MIS正在成为开放手术的一种可行且具有潜在优势的替代方法。关于长期肿瘤预后和复发的明确结论需要随机临床试验的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Oncology
Current Opinion in Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: With its easy-to-digest reviews on important advances in world literature, Current Opinion in Oncology offers expert evaluation on a wide range of topics from sixteen key disciplines including sarcomas, cancer biology, melanoma and endocrine tumors. Published bimonthly, each issue covers in detail the most pertinent advances in these fields from the previous year. This is supplemented by annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信