Defining the Role of Postoperative Radio-Hormone Therapy in Prostate Cancer.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Harshitha Dudipala, Mai Dabbas, Kshitij Pandit, Sarika D Gurnani, Rana R McKay
{"title":"Defining the Role of Postoperative Radio-Hormone Therapy in Prostate Cancer.","authors":"Harshitha Dudipala, Mai Dabbas, Kshitij Pandit, Sarika D Gurnani, Rana R McKay","doi":"10.1007/s11912-025-01694-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Postoperative radio-hormone therapy plays a significant role in management of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP), particularly in efforts to reduce biochemical recurrence (BCR), distant metastasis, and improve overall survival. BCR rates can be upwards of 50-70% at 5 years, highlighting the need for optimized risk stratification and consideration of multimodal treatment approaches. The purpose of this review is to highlight evidence-based treatment recommendations, and call attention to the importance of personalized therapeutic strategies after RP.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Both radiotherapy (RT) and ADT have been shown to optimize survival outcomes and to reduce disease progression in patients with persistent PSA, pathologic lymph-node positive disease, and adverse pathology. Early salvage RT (SRT) is typically a preferred treatment approach as it allows for treatment intensification only when clinically indicated, avoiding unnecessary radiation in men who may never recur. ADT is often added to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to enhance treatment efficacy, particularly in patients with high-risk features, though in selected lower-risk scenarios, radiation alone may be sufficient. Short-term ADT is appropriate for low-intermediate risk patients and long-term is appropriate for patients with advanced pathological features or nodal involvement. For certain high-risk pathologic findings, such as positive surgical margins and seminal vesicle invasion (T3b), adjuvant RT (aRT) may be indicated to optimize disease control. Overall, radio-hormone therapy plays a significant role in the postoperative setting by reducing the risk of recurrence and disease progression, and improving survival outcomes. There are several well-validated tools that may offer personalized risk assessments to identify which patients may most benefit from adjuvant or salvage therapies. Finally, the optimal use of such therapies continues to be investigated with ongoing trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":10861,"journal":{"name":"Current Oncology Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-025-01694-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Postoperative radio-hormone therapy plays a significant role in management of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP), particularly in efforts to reduce biochemical recurrence (BCR), distant metastasis, and improve overall survival. BCR rates can be upwards of 50-70% at 5 years, highlighting the need for optimized risk stratification and consideration of multimodal treatment approaches. The purpose of this review is to highlight evidence-based treatment recommendations, and call attention to the importance of personalized therapeutic strategies after RP.

Recent findings: Both radiotherapy (RT) and ADT have been shown to optimize survival outcomes and to reduce disease progression in patients with persistent PSA, pathologic lymph-node positive disease, and adverse pathology. Early salvage RT (SRT) is typically a preferred treatment approach as it allows for treatment intensification only when clinically indicated, avoiding unnecessary radiation in men who may never recur. ADT is often added to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to enhance treatment efficacy, particularly in patients with high-risk features, though in selected lower-risk scenarios, radiation alone may be sufficient. Short-term ADT is appropriate for low-intermediate risk patients and long-term is appropriate for patients with advanced pathological features or nodal involvement. For certain high-risk pathologic findings, such as positive surgical margins and seminal vesicle invasion (T3b), adjuvant RT (aRT) may be indicated to optimize disease control. Overall, radio-hormone therapy plays a significant role in the postoperative setting by reducing the risk of recurrence and disease progression, and improving survival outcomes. There are several well-validated tools that may offer personalized risk assessments to identify which patients may most benefit from adjuvant or salvage therapies. Finally, the optimal use of such therapies continues to be investigated with ongoing trials.

明确前列腺癌术后放射激素治疗的作用。
回顾目的:放射激素治疗在根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后前列腺癌的治疗中起着重要的作用,特别是在减少生化复发(BCR)、远处转移和提高总生存率方面。5年BCR率可高达50-70%,这突出了优化风险分层和考虑多模式治疗方法的必要性。本综述的目的是强调循证治疗建议,并呼吁关注RP后个性化治疗策略的重要性。最新发现:放疗(RT)和ADT均可优化持续性PSA、病理性淋巴结阳性疾病和不良病理患者的生存结果,并减少疾病进展。早期补救性放射治疗(SRT)通常是首选的治疗方法,因为它只允许在临床指征时加强治疗,避免对可能永远不会复发的男性进行不必要的放射治疗。ADT经常被添加到外部放射治疗(EBRT)中以提高治疗效果,特别是对于具有高风险特征的患者,尽管在选定的低风险情况下,单独放疗可能就足够了。短期ADT适用于中低风险患者,长期ADT适用于有晚期病理特征或淋巴结受累的患者。对于某些高危的病理发现,如手术切缘阳性和精囊浸润(T3b),可能需要辅助RT (aRT)来优化疾病控制。总的来说,放射激素治疗通过降低复发和疾病进展的风险以及改善生存结果,在术后环境中发挥着重要作用。有几个经过验证的工具可以提供个性化的风险评估,以确定哪些患者可能从辅助治疗或挽救治疗中获益最多。最后,这些疗法的最佳使用仍在进行试验的研究中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published clinical findings in the field of oncology. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care of those affected by cancer. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as cancer prevention, leukemia, melanoma, neuro-oncology, and palliative medicine. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信