Fifth Centile Versus 50th Centile Mean Blood Pressure Targets in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Sachin Shah, Amita Kaul, Ganesh Shiwarkar, Rajesh Nare, Jayant Khandare
{"title":"Fifth Centile Versus 50th Centile Mean Blood Pressure Targets in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Sachin Shah, Amita Kaul, Ganesh Shiwarkar, Rajesh Nare, Jayant Khandare","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Hypotension is common in septic children, mean blood pressure (MBP) guides vasoactive agent titration. However, the Surviving Sepsis Guidelines for children were unable to recommend whether to target the 5th or 50th MBP percentile for septic shock. We aim to compare two MBP targets (5th vs. 50th percentile) for titrating vasoactive agents in septic shock patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center, open-label, randomized noninferiority trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>It was conducted in a tertiary care PICU in India from April 2021 to March 2024.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients 1 month to 16 years old with septic shock unresponsive to fluids and requiring vasopressors.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Children with septic shock were randomly assigned to either the 5th or 50th percentile MBP group, with vasopressor treatment adjusted to maintain the target blood pressure (BP) for each group.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included PICU/hospital stay, duration of vasoactive use, vasopressor-related adverse events, need for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), invasive ventilation, and prevalence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). A total of 144 children were enrolled. At 28 days, mortality did not differ significantly between groups: 16.9% (12/71) in the 5th centile group vs. 23.2% (17/73) in the 50th centile group (p = 0.41; risk difference, 6.3; 95% CI, -6.9 to 19.2). Norepinephrine use was higher in the 50th centile group (85% vs. 67%; p = 0.04). Vasoactive duration was longer in the 50th centile group (30.4 ± 13.3 vs. 18.8 ± 10.8; p = 0.001). The Vasoactive-Inotropic Score was also higher (64.0 ± 35.7 vs. 45.2 ± 29.6; p = 0.001). ARDS prevalence was significantly higher in the 50th centile group (32.8% vs. 16.9%; p = 0.02). No significant differences were found in other secondary outcomes like length of stay, ventilation duration, need for CRRT, or adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Targeting a lower MBP (5th vs. 50th centile) in septic shock showed no significant difference in 28-day mortality. This suggests a lower BP target may be safe, reducing vasoactive drug use and related side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006718","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Hypotension is common in septic children, mean blood pressure (MBP) guides vasoactive agent titration. However, the Surviving Sepsis Guidelines for children were unable to recommend whether to target the 5th or 50th MBP percentile for septic shock. We aim to compare two MBP targets (5th vs. 50th percentile) for titrating vasoactive agents in septic shock patients.

Design: Single-center, open-label, randomized noninferiority trial.

Setting: It was conducted in a tertiary care PICU in India from April 2021 to March 2024.

Patients: Patients 1 month to 16 years old with septic shock unresponsive to fluids and requiring vasopressors.

Interventions: Children with septic shock were randomly assigned to either the 5th or 50th percentile MBP group, with vasopressor treatment adjusted to maintain the target blood pressure (BP) for each group.

Measurements and main results: The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included PICU/hospital stay, duration of vasoactive use, vasopressor-related adverse events, need for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), invasive ventilation, and prevalence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). A total of 144 children were enrolled. At 28 days, mortality did not differ significantly between groups: 16.9% (12/71) in the 5th centile group vs. 23.2% (17/73) in the 50th centile group (p = 0.41; risk difference, 6.3; 95% CI, -6.9 to 19.2). Norepinephrine use was higher in the 50th centile group (85% vs. 67%; p = 0.04). Vasoactive duration was longer in the 50th centile group (30.4 ± 13.3 vs. 18.8 ± 10.8; p = 0.001). The Vasoactive-Inotropic Score was also higher (64.0 ± 35.7 vs. 45.2 ± 29.6; p = 0.001). ARDS prevalence was significantly higher in the 50th centile group (32.8% vs. 16.9%; p = 0.02). No significant differences were found in other secondary outcomes like length of stay, ventilation duration, need for CRRT, or adverse events.

Conclusions: Targeting a lower MBP (5th vs. 50th centile) in septic shock showed no significant difference in 28-day mortality. This suggests a lower BP target may be safe, reducing vasoactive drug use and related side effects.

儿童感染性休克的第5百分位与第50百分位的平均血压目标:一项随机对照试验。
目的:低血压在脓毒症患儿中很常见,平均血压(MBP)可指导血管活性药物的滴定。然而,《儿童脓毒症生存指南》无法推荐脓毒症休克的目标是第5或第50个MBP百分位数。我们的目的是比较感染性休克患者滴定血管活性药物的两个MBP目标(第5百分位和第50百分位)。设计:单中心、开放标签、随机非劣效性试验。环境:于2021年4月至2024年3月在印度的三级监护PICU进行。患者:1个月至16岁感染性休克患者,对液体无反应,需要血管加压药。干预措施:脓毒性休克患儿被随机分为第5或第50百分位MBP组,并调整血管加压治疗以维持每组目标血压(BP)。测量方法和主要结果:主要终点为28天全因死亡率。次要结局包括PICU/住院时间、血管活性使用时间、血管加压剂相关不良事件、持续肾替代治疗(CRRT)的需要、有创通气和急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的患病率。共有144名儿童被招募。28天时,两组死亡率无显著差异:第5百分位组16.9% (12/71)vs第50百分位组23.2% (17/73)(p = 0.41;风险差,6.3;95% CI, -6.9 ~ 19.2)。去甲肾上腺素的使用在50百分位组较高(85% vs. 67%;P = 0.04)。50百分位组血管活性持续时间更长(30.4±13.3比18.8±10.8;P = 0.001)。血管活性-肌力评分也较高(64.0±35.7 vs. 45.2±29.6;P = 0.001)。50百分位组的ARDS患病率明显更高(32.8% vs. 16.9%;P = 0.02)。其他次要结局如住院时间、通气时间、CRRT需求或不良事件没有发现显著差异。结论:针对感染性休克的低MBP(第5百分位vs第50百分位)在28天死亡率方面没有显著差异。这表明较低的血压目标可能是安全的,可以减少血管活性药物的使用和相关的副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信