Efficacy of Ramelteon, Suvorexant, and Lemborexant for Delirium Prevention in Hospitalized Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Helen Michaela de Oliveira, Mariano Gallo Ruelas, Fernanda Valeriano Zamora, Guilherme Oliveira de Paula, Pandora Eloa Oliveira Fonseca, Laura Luiz, Pablo Ramon Fruett da Costa
{"title":"Efficacy of Ramelteon, Suvorexant, and Lemborexant for Delirium Prevention in Hospitalized Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Helen Michaela de Oliveira, Mariano Gallo Ruelas, Fernanda Valeriano Zamora, Guilherme Oliveira de Paula, Pandora Eloa Oliveira Fonseca, Laura Luiz, Pablo Ramon Fruett da Costa","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Delirium is a prevalent complication among hospitalized patients, particularly in older adults and ICU populations, and it is associated with poor prognosis. Pharmacologic interventions targeting sleep-wake regulation and neurobiologic pathways, such as orexin receptor antagonists and melatonin receptor agonists, offer promising strategies for delirium prevention. Our objective was to evaluate the preventive efficacy of suvorexant, lemborexant, and ramelteon in reducing delirium prevalence and associated clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, clinical trial registries, and gray literature databases through November 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Randomized controlled trials or observational studies involving hospitalized adults assessing the use of suvorexant, lemborexant, or ramelteon for delirium prevention were included.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Cochrane guidelines, two reviewers extracted data independently. Quality was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation; Risk of Bias in Randomized Studies; and Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies-of Interventions tools. Random-effects meta-analysis pooled risk ratios (RRs) and median differences with 95% CIs.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Twenty-four studies involving 4489 patients were analyzed, of whom 1752 (39%) received one of the evaluated pharmacotherapies. Pooled analyses showed a significant reduction in delirium prevalence in both randomized trials (RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.97; low certainty) and observational studies (RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.43-0.68; low certainty). Exploratory analyses by individual agent did not identify credible subgroup effects (interaction p > 0.1), and medication-specific findings should be interpreted with caution. No significant effects were observed for ventilator days, mortality, or length of hospital or ICU stay (very low certainty).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sleep-wake regulating pharmacologic agents were associated with 40%-46% relative risk reductions in delirium prevalence, based on low-certainty evidence. Although these findings are promising, the absence of credible subgroup effects limits conclusions about the comparative efficacy of individual agents. Further, high-quality, prospective trials are needed to confirm these results and to clarify the role of specific pharmacologic strategies in delirium prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006737","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Delirium is a prevalent complication among hospitalized patients, particularly in older adults and ICU populations, and it is associated with poor prognosis. Pharmacologic interventions targeting sleep-wake regulation and neurobiologic pathways, such as orexin receptor antagonists and melatonin receptor agonists, offer promising strategies for delirium prevention. Our objective was to evaluate the preventive efficacy of suvorexant, lemborexant, and ramelteon in reducing delirium prevalence and associated clinical outcomes.

Data sources: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, clinical trial registries, and gray literature databases through November 2024.

Study selection: Randomized controlled trials or observational studies involving hospitalized adults assessing the use of suvorexant, lemborexant, or ramelteon for delirium prevention were included.

Data extraction: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Cochrane guidelines, two reviewers extracted data independently. Quality was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation; Risk of Bias in Randomized Studies; and Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies-of Interventions tools. Random-effects meta-analysis pooled risk ratios (RRs) and median differences with 95% CIs.

Data synthesis: Twenty-four studies involving 4489 patients were analyzed, of whom 1752 (39%) received one of the evaluated pharmacotherapies. Pooled analyses showed a significant reduction in delirium prevalence in both randomized trials (RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.97; low certainty) and observational studies (RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.43-0.68; low certainty). Exploratory analyses by individual agent did not identify credible subgroup effects (interaction p > 0.1), and medication-specific findings should be interpreted with caution. No significant effects were observed for ventilator days, mortality, or length of hospital or ICU stay (very low certainty).

Conclusions: Sleep-wake regulating pharmacologic agents were associated with 40%-46% relative risk reductions in delirium prevalence, based on low-certainty evidence. Although these findings are promising, the absence of credible subgroup effects limits conclusions about the comparative efficacy of individual agents. Further, high-quality, prospective trials are needed to confirm these results and to clarify the role of specific pharmacologic strategies in delirium prevention.

Ramelteon, Suvorexant和Lemborexant预防住院患者谵妄的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:谵妄是住院患者的一种常见并发症,特别是在老年人和ICU人群中,并且与不良预后相关。针对睡眠-觉醒调节和神经生物学途径的药物干预,如食欲素受体拮抗剂和褪黑激素受体激动剂,为预防谵妄提供了有希望的策略。我们的目的是评估抗抑郁药、抗抑郁药和抗抑郁药在降低谵妄患病率和相关临床结果方面的预防效果。数据来源:我们系统地检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库、临床试验注册库和灰色文献数据库,检索时间截止到2024年11月。研究选择:纳入随机对照试验或观察性研究,涉及住院成人评估使用suvorexant、lemborexant或ramelteon预防谵妄。数据提取:根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目和Cochrane指南,两位审稿人独立提取数据。采用建议评估、发展和评价分级法评估质量;随机研究中的偏倚风险;干预工具的非随机研究和偏倚风险。随机效应荟萃分析汇集了95% ci的风险比(rr)和中位差异。数据综合:分析了24项涉及4489例患者的研究,其中1752例(39%)接受了评估的一种药物治疗。合并分析显示,两项随机试验中谵妄患病率均显著降低(RR, 0.60;95% ci, 0.38-0.97;低确定性)和观察性研究(RR, 0.54;95% ci, 0.43-0.68;低确定性)。单个药物的探索性分析没有确定可信的亚组效应(相互作用p > 0.1),并且药物特异性发现应谨慎解释。未观察到呼吸机天数、死亡率或住院或ICU住院时间的显著影响(非常低的确定性)。结论:基于低确定性证据,睡眠-觉醒调节药物与谵妄患病率相对风险降低40%-46%相关。虽然这些发现很有希望,但缺乏可信的亚组效应限制了对单个药物比较疗效的结论。此外,需要高质量的前瞻性试验来证实这些结果,并阐明特定的药物策略在谵妄预防中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信