Probiotics in infants for prevention of allergic disease.

IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Hang Zhen Wang, Elizabeth H Hayles, Michelle Fiander, John Kh Sinn, David A Osborn
{"title":"Probiotics in infants for prevention of allergic disease.","authors":"Hang Zhen Wang, Elizabeth H Hayles, Michelle Fiander, John Kh Sinn, David A Osborn","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD006475.pub3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2007. Allergic disease and food allergy are prevalent, and contribute to a significant burden of disease on the individual, their family and the healthcare system. Probiotics are live bacteria that colonise the gastrointestinal tract, and have been studied in many clinical trials for preventing allergic conditions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the benefits and harms of a probiotic, or a probiotic with added prebiotic ('synbiotic'), compared with control (placebo or no treatment) for preventing allergic diseases (asthma, eczema, allergic rhinitis) and dietary allergies in infants by two years of age.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and trial registries in December 2023. We reviewed the reference lists of studies selected for inclusion in this review, and systematic reviews on similar topics. We manually searched conference abstracts.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>We included randomised controlled trials that compared a probiotic to a control, or a probiotic added to a prebiotic ('synbiotic'). We included enterally fed infants in the first six months of life without clinical evidence of allergic disease. We included probiotics added to human milk or infant formula, added in the manufacturing process or given separately.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Infant incidence by two years of age and childhood incidence (up to 10 years of age or up to the age of latest report between 2 and 10 years) of specific allergic diseases, including: asthma, eczema, allergic rhinitis, immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated food allergy, IgE-mediated cow's milk protein allergy. Events of anaphylaxis and potential harms including adverse effects, harms or infection with probiotic bacteria.</p><p><strong>Risk of bias: </strong>We used the Cochrane RoB 2 tool to assess bias in the studies.</p><p><strong>Synthesis methods: </strong>We used the random-effects (Mantel-Haenszel) model for meta-analysis where possible. Where this was not possible due to the nature of the data, we synthesised and interpreted individual studies separately. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome.</p><p><strong>Included studies: </strong>We included 24 studies (7077 mother-infant pairs). The studies were conducted in many parts of the world, including the USA, Europe, South Korea, Japan, Singapore and Australia, with most being conducted in Europe. Studies were published between 2001 and 2020. As some studies measured outcomes such as eczema using different criteria, we made assumptions to allow us to combine data.</p><p><strong>Synthesis of results: </strong>Probiotics may result in little to no difference in asthma (risk ratio (RR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65 to 1.44; 4 studies, 954 participants; low-certainty evidence), allergic rhinitis (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.77; 5 studies, 1045 participants; low-certainty evidence) and IgE-mediated cow's milk protein allergy (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.20; 4 studies, 259 participants; low-certainty evidence) by two years of age. Probiotics may result in a slight reduction in eczema by two years of age (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.97; 18 studies, 3494 participants; low-certainty evidence); however, sensitivity analysis of the studies at low risk of bias showed little or no difference in eczema by two years of age (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.07; 4 studies, 892 participants). Probiotic supplementation may have little to no effect on the incidence of food allergy by two years, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.57 to 2.20; 3 studies, 857 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of synbiotics on eczema by two years of age (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.47; 3 studies, 1235 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Synbiotics may result in little to no difference in food allergy by two years of age (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.55 to 2.07; 1 study, 223 participants; low-certainty evidence). There were no data for the effect of synbiotics on asthma, allergic rhinitis and IgE-mediated cow's milk protein allergy by two years of age. Probiotic or synbiotic supplementation may result in little to no difference in potential harms including adverse effects, harms or infection with probiotic bacteria at any point during the study intervention by two years of age. There were no serious adverse events related to probiotics or synbiotics reported. We had some concerns about risk of bias for most studies, with only a few judged at low risk of bias. Some studies had a high risk of bias due to unclear randomisation, missing data and lack of prespecified intentions. Estimates were often imprecise, with wide CIs due to limited events. The limited data prevented subgroup analyses on infant risk factors and feeding methods for outcomes other than the effect of probiotics on eczema. Only three studies assessed synbiotic supplementation, leaving their role in allergic disease prevention uncertain. The included studies were mainly in high-income countries in many different areas of the world, but may have limited applicability to other regions.</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>There is insufficient evidence to make conclusions about the effect of probiotics and synbiotics on preventing the development of allergic diseases by two years of age and during childhood up to 10 years of age. Although there were no serious adverse events reported for the use of probiotics in infants, incorporating probiotics and synbiotics into routine practice requires further information to support their use.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This Cochrane review had no dedicated funding.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Protocol (2007) available via https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006475. Original review (2007) available via https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006475.pub2.</p>","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"6 ","pages":"CD006475"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006475.pub3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2007. Allergic disease and food allergy are prevalent, and contribute to a significant burden of disease on the individual, their family and the healthcare system. Probiotics are live bacteria that colonise the gastrointestinal tract, and have been studied in many clinical trials for preventing allergic conditions.

Objectives: To evaluate the benefits and harms of a probiotic, or a probiotic with added prebiotic ('synbiotic'), compared with control (placebo or no treatment) for preventing allergic diseases (asthma, eczema, allergic rhinitis) and dietary allergies in infants by two years of age.

Search methods: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and trial registries in December 2023. We reviewed the reference lists of studies selected for inclusion in this review, and systematic reviews on similar topics. We manually searched conference abstracts.

Eligibility criteria: We included randomised controlled trials that compared a probiotic to a control, or a probiotic added to a prebiotic ('synbiotic'). We included enterally fed infants in the first six months of life without clinical evidence of allergic disease. We included probiotics added to human milk or infant formula, added in the manufacturing process or given separately.

Outcomes: Infant incidence by two years of age and childhood incidence (up to 10 years of age or up to the age of latest report between 2 and 10 years) of specific allergic diseases, including: asthma, eczema, allergic rhinitis, immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated food allergy, IgE-mediated cow's milk protein allergy. Events of anaphylaxis and potential harms including adverse effects, harms or infection with probiotic bacteria.

Risk of bias: We used the Cochrane RoB 2 tool to assess bias in the studies.

Synthesis methods: We used the random-effects (Mantel-Haenszel) model for meta-analysis where possible. Where this was not possible due to the nature of the data, we synthesised and interpreted individual studies separately. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome.

Included studies: We included 24 studies (7077 mother-infant pairs). The studies were conducted in many parts of the world, including the USA, Europe, South Korea, Japan, Singapore and Australia, with most being conducted in Europe. Studies were published between 2001 and 2020. As some studies measured outcomes such as eczema using different criteria, we made assumptions to allow us to combine data.

Synthesis of results: Probiotics may result in little to no difference in asthma (risk ratio (RR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65 to 1.44; 4 studies, 954 participants; low-certainty evidence), allergic rhinitis (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.77; 5 studies, 1045 participants; low-certainty evidence) and IgE-mediated cow's milk protein allergy (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.20; 4 studies, 259 participants; low-certainty evidence) by two years of age. Probiotics may result in a slight reduction in eczema by two years of age (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.97; 18 studies, 3494 participants; low-certainty evidence); however, sensitivity analysis of the studies at low risk of bias showed little or no difference in eczema by two years of age (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.07; 4 studies, 892 participants). Probiotic supplementation may have little to no effect on the incidence of food allergy by two years, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.57 to 2.20; 3 studies, 857 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of synbiotics on eczema by two years of age (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.47; 3 studies, 1235 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Synbiotics may result in little to no difference in food allergy by two years of age (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.55 to 2.07; 1 study, 223 participants; low-certainty evidence). There were no data for the effect of synbiotics on asthma, allergic rhinitis and IgE-mediated cow's milk protein allergy by two years of age. Probiotic or synbiotic supplementation may result in little to no difference in potential harms including adverse effects, harms or infection with probiotic bacteria at any point during the study intervention by two years of age. There were no serious adverse events related to probiotics or synbiotics reported. We had some concerns about risk of bias for most studies, with only a few judged at low risk of bias. Some studies had a high risk of bias due to unclear randomisation, missing data and lack of prespecified intentions. Estimates were often imprecise, with wide CIs due to limited events. The limited data prevented subgroup analyses on infant risk factors and feeding methods for outcomes other than the effect of probiotics on eczema. Only three studies assessed synbiotic supplementation, leaving their role in allergic disease prevention uncertain. The included studies were mainly in high-income countries in many different areas of the world, but may have limited applicability to other regions.

Authors' conclusions: There is insufficient evidence to make conclusions about the effect of probiotics and synbiotics on preventing the development of allergic diseases by two years of age and during childhood up to 10 years of age. Although there were no serious adverse events reported for the use of probiotics in infants, incorporating probiotics and synbiotics into routine practice requires further information to support their use.

Funding: This Cochrane review had no dedicated funding.

Registration: Protocol (2007) available via https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006475. Original review (2007) available via https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006475.pub2.

婴儿益生菌预防过敏性疾病。
理由:这是对2007年首次发表的Cochrane综述的更新。过敏性疾病和食物过敏很普遍,并对个人、家庭和医疗保健系统造成重大的疾病负担。益生菌是寄生于胃肠道的活细菌,在许多预防过敏的临床试验中被研究过。目的:评估益生菌或添加益生元的益生菌(“合成”)与对照组(安慰剂或未治疗)在预防两岁前婴儿过敏性疾病(哮喘、湿疹、过敏性鼻炎)和饮食过敏方面的利弊。检索方法:检索了2023年12月的CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase和试验注册库。我们查阅了入选本综述的研究的参考文献清单,以及类似主题的系统综述。我们手动搜索会议摘要。入选标准:我们纳入了将益生菌与对照组或益生菌添加到益生元(“合成”)中进行比较的随机对照试验。我们纳入了没有临床过敏疾病证据的6个月以内肠内喂养的婴儿。我们将益生菌添加到母乳或婴儿配方奶粉中,在生产过程中添加或单独给予。结果:婴儿2岁前发病率和儿童(至10岁或至最近报告年龄在2 - 10岁之间)特异性过敏性疾病的发病率,包括:哮喘、湿疹、变应性鼻炎、免疫球蛋白E (IgE)介导的食物过敏、IgE介导的牛奶蛋白过敏。过敏反应事件和潜在危害,包括不良反应、危害或益生菌感染。偏倚风险:我们使用Cochrane RoB 2工具评估研究中的偏倚。综合方法:我们尽可能使用随机效应(Mantel-Haenszel)模型进行meta分析。由于数据的性质,这是不可能的,我们综合和解释单独的研究。我们使用GRADE来评估每个结果证据的确定性。纳入的研究:我们纳入了24项研究(7077对母婴)。这些研究是在世界许多地方进行的,包括美国、欧洲、韩国、日本、新加坡和澳大利亚,其中大多数是在欧洲进行的。研究发表于2001年至2020年之间。由于一些研究使用不同的标准来衡量湿疹等结果,因此我们做出了假设,以便将数据结合起来。结果综合:益生菌对哮喘的影响可能很小或没有差异(风险比(RR) 0.96, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.65 ~ 1.44;4项研究,954名参与者;低确定性证据)、变应性鼻炎(RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.45 ~ 1.77;5项研究,1045名受试者;低确定性证据)和ige介导的牛奶蛋白过敏(RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.82 ~ 1.20;4项研究,259名参与者;低确定性证据)。益生菌可能导致两岁时湿疹的轻微减少(RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78至0.97;18项研究,3494名受试者;确定性的证据);然而,低偏倚风险研究的敏感性分析显示,两岁时湿疹的差异很小或没有差异(RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.69至1.07;4项研究,892名参与者)。补充益生菌可能在两年内对食物过敏的发生率几乎没有影响,但证据非常不确定(RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.57至2.20;3项研究,857名参与者;非常低确定性证据)。证据非常不确定合生剂对两岁前湿疹的影响(RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.52 ~ 1.47;3项研究,1235名受试者;非常低确定性证据)。到两岁时,合成抗生素可能导致食物过敏的差异很小或没有差异(RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.55至2.07;1项研究,223名参与者;确定性的证据)。到两岁时,还没有关于合生剂对哮喘、过敏性鼻炎和ige介导的牛奶蛋白过敏影响的数据。益生菌或合成菌补充剂在研究干预期间的任何时候都可能导致潜在危害的差异很小甚至没有差异,包括不良反应,危害或益生菌感染。没有与益生菌或合成菌相关的严重不良事件的报道。我们对大多数研究的偏倚风险有一些担忧,只有少数研究被判定为低偏倚风险。一些研究由于不明确的随机化、数据缺失和缺乏预先指定的意图而有很高的偏倚风险。估计往往不精确,由于事件有限,ci很宽。有限的数据阻止了对婴儿危险因素和喂养方法的亚组分析,而不是益生菌对湿疹的影响。只有三个研究评估了合成补充剂,这使得它们在过敏性疾病预防中的作用不确定。 纳入的研究主要是在世界许多不同地区的高收入国家进行的,但对其他地区的适用性可能有限。作者的结论:目前还没有足够的证据来证明益生菌和合成菌对预防2岁及10岁以下儿童过敏性疾病发展的作用。虽然没有关于婴儿使用益生菌的严重不良事件的报道,但将益生菌和合成菌纳入日常实践需要进一步的信息来支持它们的使用。资金来源:Cochrane综述没有专门的资金来源。注册:协议(2007)可通过https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006475获得。原始评论(2007年)可通过https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006475.pub2获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
173
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) stands as the premier database for systematic reviews in healthcare. It comprises Cochrane Reviews, along with protocols for these reviews, editorials, and supplements. Owned and operated by Cochrane, a worldwide independent network of healthcare stakeholders, the CDSR (ISSN 1469-493X) encompasses a broad spectrum of health-related topics, including health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信