Katie Liu, Ariana Chen, Pranav Rajaram, Grayson Buning, Allen A Lee, Prashant Singh
{"title":"PAMORAs in Opioid-Induced Constipation: Are We Following the Guidelines?","authors":"Katie Liu, Ariana Chen, Pranav Rajaram, Grayson Buning, Allen A Lee, Prashant Singh","doi":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peripherally acting u-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs) are a safe and efficacious medication for treating opioid-induced constipation (OIC). This study evaluates the utilization of PAMORAs in patients with laxative-refractory OIC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with OIC from 2018 to 2023 were retrospectively identified at a tertiary care center. As recommended by the guidelines, patients were considered eligible for PAMORAs if they had failed at least 2 laxatives. Data on PAMORA prescription, demographics, clinical characteristics, and specialty of the managing provider were collected and analyzed using logistic regression and χ 2 analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 281 patients diagnosed with OIC, 204 (73%) were eligible for a PAMORA, of which only 58 (28%) were prescribed one. There were no differences in demographic or clinical characteristics between those who were offered PAMORAs vs not. There was a significant difference in prescribing patterns based on provider specialty ( P < 0.001). Although gastrointestinal (GI) specialists saw less than half of the eligible patients, they offered PAMORAs at the highest proportion of 59% compared with non-GI specialists (13-16%) or primary care providers (18%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed 12.7-fold increased odds of being offered a PAMORA if the provider was from the GI department compared with all non-GI providers ( P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>PAMORAs are underutilized in patients with OIC. GI prescribers offer PAMORAs at a higher proportion than other departments, and being seen in GI independently increases the likelihood of a patient receiving a PAMORA. This suggests that underutilization may be due to a lack of awareness and further education about PAMORAs is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":10278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000876","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Peripherally acting u-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs) are a safe and efficacious medication for treating opioid-induced constipation (OIC). This study evaluates the utilization of PAMORAs in patients with laxative-refractory OIC.
Methods: Patients diagnosed with OIC from 2018 to 2023 were retrospectively identified at a tertiary care center. As recommended by the guidelines, patients were considered eligible for PAMORAs if they had failed at least 2 laxatives. Data on PAMORA prescription, demographics, clinical characteristics, and specialty of the managing provider were collected and analyzed using logistic regression and χ 2 analysis.
Results: Of 281 patients diagnosed with OIC, 204 (73%) were eligible for a PAMORA, of which only 58 (28%) were prescribed one. There were no differences in demographic or clinical characteristics between those who were offered PAMORAs vs not. There was a significant difference in prescribing patterns based on provider specialty ( P < 0.001). Although gastrointestinal (GI) specialists saw less than half of the eligible patients, they offered PAMORAs at the highest proportion of 59% compared with non-GI specialists (13-16%) or primary care providers (18%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed 12.7-fold increased odds of being offered a PAMORA if the provider was from the GI department compared with all non-GI providers ( P < 0.001).
Discussion: PAMORAs are underutilized in patients with OIC. GI prescribers offer PAMORAs at a higher proportion than other departments, and being seen in GI independently increases the likelihood of a patient receiving a PAMORA. This suggests that underutilization may be due to a lack of awareness and further education about PAMORAs is warranted.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology (CTG), published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), is a peer-reviewed open access online journal dedicated to innovative clinical work in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. CTG hopes to fulfill an unmet need for clinicians and scientists by welcoming novel cohort studies, early-phase clinical trials, qualitative and quantitative epidemiologic research, hypothesis-generating research, studies of novel mechanisms and methodologies including public health interventions, and integration of approaches across organs and disciplines. CTG also welcomes hypothesis-generating small studies, methods papers, and translational research with clear applications to human physiology or disease.
Colon and small bowel
Endoscopy and novel diagnostics
Esophagus
Functional GI disorders
Immunology of the GI tract
Microbiology of the GI tract
Inflammatory bowel disease
Pancreas and biliary tract
Liver
Pathology
Pediatrics
Preventative medicine
Nutrition/obesity
Stomach.