A World Health Organization tool for assessing research ethics oversight systems.

IF 8.4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Bulletin of the World Health Organization Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-03 DOI:10.2471/BLT.24.292219
Carl H Coleman, Alireza Khadem, John C Reeder, Hiiti B Sillo, Rogerio Gaspar, Andreas Reis
{"title":"A World Health Organization tool for assessing research ethics oversight systems.","authors":"Carl H Coleman, Alireza Khadem, John C Reeder, Hiiti B Sillo, Rogerio Gaspar, Andreas Reis","doi":"10.2471/BLT.24.292219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although most countries have ethical oversight systems for health-related research involving human participants, mechanisms for assessing the quality of those systems are not regularly used, particularly in low-resource settings. To address this gap, the Regulatory System Strengthening, Regulation and Safety unit and Health Ethics and Governance unit of the World Health Organization (WHO) recently released a tool for benchmarking ethics oversight of health-related research involving human participants. The tool provides a simple, easy-to-measure set of indicators for assessing the quality of research ethics oversight systems without the need to invest a great deal of resources. The tool comprises 48 indicators divided across three areas: (i) the national context; (ii) research ethics committees; and (iii) institutions that conduct health-related research involving humans, such as academic medical centres. Indicators related to the national context are intended to be evaluated in a single assessment applicable to the country as a whole, whereas indicators related to research ethics committees and research institutions are evaluated on an entity-by-entity basis. Some countries may choose to assess a representative sample of research ethics committees and institutions; alternatively, national authorities might ask research ethics committees and institutions to undertake self-assessments and report the results. Research ethics committees or institutions could also use WHO's tool on their own as part of a process of quality improvement. WHO is working with global partners to disseminate the tool and support global implementation. Widespread use of the tool is expected to enhance policy coherence in ethics oversight and facilitate multinational research.</p>","PeriodicalId":9465,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization","volume":"103 6","pages":"403-409"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12161159/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.24.292219","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although most countries have ethical oversight systems for health-related research involving human participants, mechanisms for assessing the quality of those systems are not regularly used, particularly in low-resource settings. To address this gap, the Regulatory System Strengthening, Regulation and Safety unit and Health Ethics and Governance unit of the World Health Organization (WHO) recently released a tool for benchmarking ethics oversight of health-related research involving human participants. The tool provides a simple, easy-to-measure set of indicators for assessing the quality of research ethics oversight systems without the need to invest a great deal of resources. The tool comprises 48 indicators divided across three areas: (i) the national context; (ii) research ethics committees; and (iii) institutions that conduct health-related research involving humans, such as academic medical centres. Indicators related to the national context are intended to be evaluated in a single assessment applicable to the country as a whole, whereas indicators related to research ethics committees and research institutions are evaluated on an entity-by-entity basis. Some countries may choose to assess a representative sample of research ethics committees and institutions; alternatively, national authorities might ask research ethics committees and institutions to undertake self-assessments and report the results. Research ethics committees or institutions could also use WHO's tool on their own as part of a process of quality improvement. WHO is working with global partners to disseminate the tool and support global implementation. Widespread use of the tool is expected to enhance policy coherence in ethics oversight and facilitate multinational research.

世界卫生组织用于评估研究伦理监督系统的工具。
虽然大多数国家都有涉及人类参与者的与健康有关的研究的伦理监督系统,但没有经常使用评估这些系统质量的机制,特别是在资源匮乏的情况下。为了弥补这一差距,世界卫生组织(世卫组织)加强监管系统、监管和安全股以及卫生伦理和治理股最近发布了一个工具,用于对涉及人类参与者的卫生相关研究进行道德监督。该工具提供了一套简单、易于测量的指标,用于评估研究伦理监督系统的质量,而不需要投入大量资源。该工具包括48项指标,分为三个领域:(i)国家背景;(ii)研究伦理委员会;(三)进行涉及人类健康的研究的机构,如学术医疗中心。与国家背景有关的指标打算在适用于整个国家的单一评估中进行评价,而与研究伦理委员会和研究机构有关的指标则在逐个实体的基础上进行评价。一些国家可能选择评估研究伦理委员会和机构的代表性样本;或者,国家当局可以要求研究伦理委员会和机构进行自我评估并报告结果。研究伦理委员会或机构也可以自行使用世卫组织的工具,作为质量改进过程的一部分。世卫组织正在与全球伙伴合作,传播该工具并支持全球实施。该工具的广泛使用有望加强伦理监督方面的政策一致性,并促进跨国研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Bulletin of the World Health Organization 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
0.90%
发文量
317
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of the World Health Organization Journal Overview: Leading public health journal Peer-reviewed monthly journal Special focus on developing countries Global scope and authority Top public and environmental health journal Impact factor of 6.818 (2018), according to Web of Science ranking Audience: Essential reading for public health decision-makers and researchers Provides blend of research, well-informed opinion, and news
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信