[Healthcare institution resilience and the influencing factors during infectious disease outbreaks].

Q3 Medicine
北京大学学报(医学版) Pub Date : 2025-06-18
Y Fu, J Zhang, B Han, Q Wang, Z Zhu, Z Nie, Y Tan, Q Liu, X Li, J Guo, R Jiang, L Yang
{"title":"[Healthcare institution resilience and the influencing factors during infectious disease outbreaks].","authors":"Y Fu, J Zhang, B Han, Q Wang, Z Zhu, Z Nie, Y Tan, Q Liu, X Li, J Guo, R Jiang, L Yang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the association between healthcare workers mental health, institutional supplies and facilities, inter-organizational coordination during infectious disease outbreaks, and the healthcare institution resilience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online questionnaire survey was conducted among the healthcare workforce from 146 institutions in Beijing from January 13, 2023 to February 9, 2023, and a total of 1 434 eligible respondents were included. The sample comprised 408 responses from tertiary hospitals, 117 from secondary hospitals, and 909 from primary care institutions. The resilience indicator for healthcare institutions was defined as the degree to which medical services met patient demands, with influencing factors including physical factors, such as material shortages and facility space adaptation or expansion, organizational factors such as information sharing and patient referral, and psychological factors were evaluated using job satisfaction (extrinsic satisfaction, intrinsic satisfaction), burnout (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, reduced personal accomplishment), and depression status. Ordered multiclassification Logistic regression was used to examine the impact of various factors on the degree to which healthcare services met patient needs; additionally, demographic factors that might influence institutional resilience were controlled.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the emergency response phase, 93% of hospitals maintained the capacity to meet patient needs, though tertiary hospitals demonstrated significantly higher rates of service inadequacy (21.05%). Material shortages were reported across all institutions, with tertiary hospitals experiencing more frequent multi-item shortages. Inter-institutional collaboration patterns revealed substantial variation: 87.50% of primary care facilities, 42.86% of secondary hospitals, and 31.58% of tertiary hospitals. Healthcare workers across all levels reported mild depressive symptoms and moderate-to-severe burnout levels. Regression analysis showed high satisfaction (overall satisfaction <i>β</i>=0.04, extrinsic satisfaction <i>β</i>=0.06, and intrinsic satisfaction <i>β</i>=0.08), low degree of job burnout (emotional exhaustion <i>β</i>=-0.04, depersonalization <i>β</i>=-0.07 and reduced personal accomplishment <i>β</i>=0.01), low degree of depression (<i>β</i>=-0.06) were significantly associated with higher healthcare institution resilience. In addition, material shortages were significantly associated with lower resilience, and renovation and expansion of treatment spaces, and information sharing, were all associated with higher resilience. Demographic factors (age, gender, marital status, educational background, etc.) had no significant impact on resilience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mental health status significantly influences healthcare institution resilience. As human resources constitute the core asset of healthcare institutions, strategic optimization of workforce allocation and psychological support interventions can effectively strengthen resilience. Moreover, healthcare institution resilience is positively impacted by orderly material supply chains, timely resource distribution, and adaptive reconfiguration of clinical spaces. Finally, facilitating information sharing also enhances institutional resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":8790,"journal":{"name":"北京大学学报(医学版)","volume":"57 3","pages":"529-536"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12171596/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"北京大学学报(医学版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the association between healthcare workers mental health, institutional supplies and facilities, inter-organizational coordination during infectious disease outbreaks, and the healthcare institution resilience.

Methods: An online questionnaire survey was conducted among the healthcare workforce from 146 institutions in Beijing from January 13, 2023 to February 9, 2023, and a total of 1 434 eligible respondents were included. The sample comprised 408 responses from tertiary hospitals, 117 from secondary hospitals, and 909 from primary care institutions. The resilience indicator for healthcare institutions was defined as the degree to which medical services met patient demands, with influencing factors including physical factors, such as material shortages and facility space adaptation or expansion, organizational factors such as information sharing and patient referral, and psychological factors were evaluated using job satisfaction (extrinsic satisfaction, intrinsic satisfaction), burnout (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, reduced personal accomplishment), and depression status. Ordered multiclassification Logistic regression was used to examine the impact of various factors on the degree to which healthcare services met patient needs; additionally, demographic factors that might influence institutional resilience were controlled.

Results: During the emergency response phase, 93% of hospitals maintained the capacity to meet patient needs, though tertiary hospitals demonstrated significantly higher rates of service inadequacy (21.05%). Material shortages were reported across all institutions, with tertiary hospitals experiencing more frequent multi-item shortages. Inter-institutional collaboration patterns revealed substantial variation: 87.50% of primary care facilities, 42.86% of secondary hospitals, and 31.58% of tertiary hospitals. Healthcare workers across all levels reported mild depressive symptoms and moderate-to-severe burnout levels. Regression analysis showed high satisfaction (overall satisfaction β=0.04, extrinsic satisfaction β=0.06, and intrinsic satisfaction β=0.08), low degree of job burnout (emotional exhaustion β=-0.04, depersonalization β=-0.07 and reduced personal accomplishment β=0.01), low degree of depression (β=-0.06) were significantly associated with higher healthcare institution resilience. In addition, material shortages were significantly associated with lower resilience, and renovation and expansion of treatment spaces, and information sharing, were all associated with higher resilience. Demographic factors (age, gender, marital status, educational background, etc.) had no significant impact on resilience.

Conclusion: Mental health status significantly influences healthcare institution resilience. As human resources constitute the core asset of healthcare institutions, strategic optimization of workforce allocation and psychological support interventions can effectively strengthen resilience. Moreover, healthcare institution resilience is positively impacted by orderly material supply chains, timely resource distribution, and adaptive reconfiguration of clinical spaces. Finally, facilitating information sharing also enhances institutional resilience.

传染病暴发期间医疗机构应变能力及其影响因素
目的:分析传染病暴发期间医护人员心理健康、机构物资和设施、组织间协调与医疗机构应变能力的关系。方法:于2023年1月13日至2023年2月9日,对北京市146家医疗卫生机构的医护人员进行在线问卷调查,共纳入1434名符合要求的调查对象。样本包括来自三级医院的408份回复,来自二级医院的117份,来自初级保健机构的909份。医疗机构弹性指标定义为医疗服务满足患者需求的程度,其影响因素包括物理因素,如物质短缺和设施空间的适应或扩建;组织因素,如信息共享和患者转诊;心理因素,包括工作满意度(外在满意度、内在满意度)、倦怠(情绪耗竭、去人格化)和心理因素。降低个人成就)和抑郁状态。采用有序多分类Logistic回归检验各因素对医疗服务满足患者需求程度的影响;此外,控制了可能影响制度弹性的人口因素。结果:在应急阶段,93%的医院保持了满足患者需求的能力,但三级医院的服务不足率明显更高(21.05%)。所有机构都报告了物资短缺,三级医院更经常出现多种物品短缺。机构间合作模式显示出很大的差异:初级保健机构为87.50%,二级医院为42.86%,三级医院为31.58%。所有级别的医护人员都报告了轻度抑郁症状和中度至重度倦怠水平。回归分析显示,高满意度(总体满意度β=0.04,外在满意度β=0.06,内在满意度β=0.08)、低工作倦怠程度(情绪耗竭β=-0.04,人格解体β=-0.07,个人成就感降低β=0.01)、低抑郁程度(β=-0.06)与较高的医疗机构弹性有显著相关。此外,材料短缺与较低的恢复力显著相关,治疗空间的翻新和扩展以及信息共享都与较高的恢复力相关。人口因素(年龄、性别、婚姻状况、学历等)对心理弹性无显著影响。结论:心理健康状况对医疗机构弹性有显著影响。人力资源是医疗机构的核心资产,人力资源配置的战略优化和心理支持干预可以有效增强医疗机构的弹性。此外,有序的物资供应链、及时的资源分配和临床空间的适应性重构对医疗机构的弹性有积极影响。最后,促进信息共享还能增强制度弹性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
北京大学学报(医学版)
北京大学学报(医学版) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9815
期刊介绍: Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban / Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), established in 1959, is a national academic journal sponsored by Peking University, and its former name is Journal of Beijing Medical University. The coverage of the Journal includes basic medical sciences, clinical medicine, oral medicine, surgery, public health and epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacy. Over the last few years, the Journal has published articles and reports covering major topics in the different special issues (e.g. research on disease genome, theory of drug withdrawal, mechanism and prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, stomatology, orthopaedic, public health, urology and reproductive medicine). All the topics involve latest advances in medical sciences, hot topics in specific specialties, and prevention and treatment of major diseases. The Journal has been indexed and abstracted by PubMed Central (PMC), MEDLINE/PubMed, EBSCO, Embase, Scopus, Chemical Abstracts (CA), Western Pacific Region Index Medicus (WPR), JSTChina, and almost all the Chinese sciences and technical index systems, including Chinese Science and Technology Paper Citation Database (CSTPCD), Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD), China BioMedical Bibliographic Database (CBM), CMCI, Chinese Biological Abstracts, China National Academic Magazine Data-Base (CNKI), Wanfang Data (ChinaInfo), etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信