Characterisation of the Gastrointestinal Microbiome of Green Sea Turtles (Chelonia mydas): A Systematic Review.

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Animals Pub Date : 2025-05-29 DOI:10.3390/ani15111594
Dawood Ghafoor, Orachun Hayakijkosol, Carla Ewels, Robert Kinobe
{"title":"Characterisation of the Gastrointestinal Microbiome of Green Sea Turtles (<i>Chelonia mydas</i>): A Systematic Review.","authors":"Dawood Ghafoor, Orachun Hayakijkosol, Carla Ewels, Robert Kinobe","doi":"10.3390/ani15111594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The gut microbiome of sea turtles is essential for their ecological resilience and adaptation to environmental stressors. We hypothesised that different gut microbial profiles existed between green sea turtles kept in captivity and those in the wild. The aim of this systematic review was to determine dominant bacterial phyla in the gut microbiomes of wild and captive green sea turtles. Comparison of the top four bacterial phyla revealed that Bacillota was the most abundant phylum in captive turtles (40.9-87.5%), but it only ranked second (3.5-57.8%) in wild turtles. Bacteroidota had comparable relative abundance in captive (8.7-45.6%) and wild (3.6-43.1%) populations. By contrast, the relative abundance of Pseudomonadota was higher in wild turtles (6.2-68.1%) compared to the captive population (0.1-6.6%). Verrucomicrobiota was less prevalent in wild and captive populations, with relative abundances ranging from 0.28 to 5.4% and 2.3 to 7.2%, respectively. These findings highlight a putative gut microbial shift between wild and captive green sea turtle populations. This shift may be shaped by variations in environmental factors in captivity or the wild. Nonetheless, the significance of these putative changes is still unknown; the potential to use microbial shifts to guide management, rehabilitation, and conservation of green sea turtles is promising, but remains limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":7955,"journal":{"name":"Animals","volume":"15 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12153662/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animals","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15111594","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The gut microbiome of sea turtles is essential for their ecological resilience and adaptation to environmental stressors. We hypothesised that different gut microbial profiles existed between green sea turtles kept in captivity and those in the wild. The aim of this systematic review was to determine dominant bacterial phyla in the gut microbiomes of wild and captive green sea turtles. Comparison of the top four bacterial phyla revealed that Bacillota was the most abundant phylum in captive turtles (40.9-87.5%), but it only ranked second (3.5-57.8%) in wild turtles. Bacteroidota had comparable relative abundance in captive (8.7-45.6%) and wild (3.6-43.1%) populations. By contrast, the relative abundance of Pseudomonadota was higher in wild turtles (6.2-68.1%) compared to the captive population (0.1-6.6%). Verrucomicrobiota was less prevalent in wild and captive populations, with relative abundances ranging from 0.28 to 5.4% and 2.3 to 7.2%, respectively. These findings highlight a putative gut microbial shift between wild and captive green sea turtle populations. This shift may be shaped by variations in environmental factors in captivity or the wild. Nonetheless, the significance of these putative changes is still unknown; the potential to use microbial shifts to guide management, rehabilitation, and conservation of green sea turtles is promising, but remains limited.

绿海龟(Chelonia mydas)胃肠道微生物组的特征:系统综述。
海龟的肠道微生物群对其生态恢复能力和适应环境压力至关重要。我们假设圈养绿海龟和野生绿海龟之间存在不同的肠道微生物特征。本系统综述的目的是确定野生和圈养绿海龟肠道微生物群中的优势细菌门。结果表明,圈养龟中Bacillota菌群最多(40.9 ~ 87.5%),野生龟中Bacillota菌群次之(3.5 ~ 57.8%)。拟杆菌群在圈养种群(8.7-45.6%)和野生种群(3.6-43.1%)中相对丰度相当。野生龟群中假单胞菌的相对丰度(6.2 ~ 68.1%)高于圈养龟群(0.1 ~ 6.6%)。Verrucomicrobiota在野生种群和圈养种群中较少见,相对丰度分别为0.28 ~ 5.4%和2.3 ~ 7.2%。这些发现强调了野生和圈养绿海龟种群之间可能存在的肠道微生物变化。这种转变可能受到圈养或野外环境因素的影响。尽管如此,这些假定的变化的意义仍然未知;利用微生物转移来指导绿海龟的管理、康复和保护的潜力是有希望的,但仍然有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animals
Animals Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
3015
审稿时长
20.52 days
期刊介绍: Animals (ISSN 2076-2615) is an international and interdisciplinary scholarly open access journal. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications, and short notes that are relevant to any field of study that involves animals, including zoology, ethnozoology, animal science, animal ethics and animal welfare. However, preference will be given to those articles that provide an understanding of animals within a larger context (i.e., the animals'' interactions with the outside world, including humans). There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental details and/or method of study, must be provided for research articles. Articles submitted that involve subjecting animals to unnecessary pain or suffering will not be accepted, and all articles must be submitted with the necessary ethical approval (please refer to the Ethical Guidelines for more information).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信