A New Method of Litter Equalization in Rabbit.

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Animals Pub Date : 2025-06-03 DOI:10.3390/ani15111644
Tamás Atkári, Zsolt Gerencsér, István Nagy, Zsolt Szendrő
{"title":"A New Method of Litter Equalization in Rabbit.","authors":"Tamás Atkári, Zsolt Gerencsér, István Nagy, Zsolt Szendrő","doi":"10.3390/ani15111644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>On rabbit farms, the mortality of rabbits born with a low weight is high, and there is a large variation in body weight, so the carcass and the cut carcass are not uniform. The experiment aimed to reduce the mortality of kits born with a low weight and to produce more-uniform slaughter animals. In the experiment, each rabbit doe in the Control group raised 10 newborn kits with low birth weights (S10, <i>n</i> = 100), 10 with medium birth weights (M10C, <i>n</i> = 100), or 10 with high birth weights (L10, <i>n</i> = 100). In the Experimental group, the rabbit does raised 9 newborn kits with low birth weights (S9, <i>n</i> = 90), 10 with medium birth weights (M10E, <i>n</i> = 100), or 11 with high birth weights (L11, <i>n</i> = 110). Compared with the S10 group, the mortality (between 0 and 7 days) in the S9 group was reduced (20.0% vs. 8.9%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). While the body weights of the S10, M10C, and L10 subgroups in the Control group increased at 84 days (2876 g, 2872 g, and 3047 g, respectively), there was no significant difference in the body weights of the three subgroups (S9, M10E, and L11) in the Experimental group. The new litter-equalization method was therefore suitable for reducing mortality and achieving a more-equal slaughter weight. At the same time, there was no difference between the groups in the dressing out percentage. The authors further suggest considering the teat number of the does and raising low-weight kits in litters of eight.</p>","PeriodicalId":7955,"journal":{"name":"Animals","volume":"15 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12153790/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animals","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15111644","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On rabbit farms, the mortality of rabbits born with a low weight is high, and there is a large variation in body weight, so the carcass and the cut carcass are not uniform. The experiment aimed to reduce the mortality of kits born with a low weight and to produce more-uniform slaughter animals. In the experiment, each rabbit doe in the Control group raised 10 newborn kits with low birth weights (S10, n = 100), 10 with medium birth weights (M10C, n = 100), or 10 with high birth weights (L10, n = 100). In the Experimental group, the rabbit does raised 9 newborn kits with low birth weights (S9, n = 90), 10 with medium birth weights (M10E, n = 100), or 11 with high birth weights (L11, n = 110). Compared with the S10 group, the mortality (between 0 and 7 days) in the S9 group was reduced (20.0% vs. 8.9%; p < 0.001). While the body weights of the S10, M10C, and L10 subgroups in the Control group increased at 84 days (2876 g, 2872 g, and 3047 g, respectively), there was no significant difference in the body weights of the three subgroups (S9, M10E, and L11) in the Experimental group. The new litter-equalization method was therefore suitable for reducing mortality and achieving a more-equal slaughter weight. At the same time, there was no difference between the groups in the dressing out percentage. The authors further suggest considering the teat number of the does and raising low-weight kits in litters of eight.

一种新的家兔产仔均等方法。
在养兔场,出生体重低的兔子死亡率高,而且体重变化大,所以屠体和切割屠体不均匀。该实验旨在降低出生体重过轻的雏鸡的死亡率,并生产出更均匀的屠宰动物。试验中,对照组每只母兔饲养低出生重10只(S10, n = 100)、中出生重10只(M10C, n = 100)、高出生重10只(L10, n = 100)。实验组低出生重9只(S9, n = 90),中出生重10只(M10E, n = 100),高出生重11只(L11, n = 110)。与S10组相比,S9组的死亡率(0 ~ 7天)降低(20.0% vs. 8.9%;P < 0.001)。对照组的S10、M10C和L10亚组的体重在第84天增加(分别为2876 g、2872 g和3047 g),而实验组的S9、M10E和L11三个亚组的体重在第84天无显著差异。因此,新的产仔均等方法适用于降低死亡率和实现更均匀的屠宰重量。与此同时,各组之间的脱模率无显著差异。作者进一步建议考虑母狗的数量,并在每窝8只的情况下饲养低体重的幼崽。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animals
Animals Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
3015
审稿时长
20.52 days
期刊介绍: Animals (ISSN 2076-2615) is an international and interdisciplinary scholarly open access journal. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications, and short notes that are relevant to any field of study that involves animals, including zoology, ethnozoology, animal science, animal ethics and animal welfare. However, preference will be given to those articles that provide an understanding of animals within a larger context (i.e., the animals'' interactions with the outside world, including humans). There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental details and/or method of study, must be provided for research articles. Articles submitted that involve subjecting animals to unnecessary pain or suffering will not be accepted, and all articles must be submitted with the necessary ethical approval (please refer to the Ethical Guidelines for more information).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信