Enhancing Skin Quality With a Sequential Treatment Using Two Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers: A Prospective, Multicenter, Interventional Study.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Paula Rosso, Jesús Colina, Carlos Jarne, Eva Garrigós, Bárbara Magalhães, Manuel-Anthony Da Costa, Kevin Poupard
{"title":"Enhancing Skin Quality With a Sequential Treatment Using Two Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers: A Prospective, Multicenter, Interventional Study.","authors":"Paula Rosso, Jesús Colina, Carlos Jarne, Eva Garrigós, Bárbara Magalhães, Manuel-Anthony Da Costa, Kevin Poupard","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Skin quality affects facial attractiveness, which can significantly impact self-esteem and overall quality of life. The preferred fillers for enhancing skin quality are non-crosslinked or slightly crosslinked HA gels, such as RHA1 and R1, as they diffuse more easily into peripheral tissues.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study was designed to assess the performance and safety of RHA1 treatment for fine lines, such as smiling lines (SLs), including an exploratory arm assessing the performance of subsequent R1 treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SKINQARE was a prospective, multicenter, low-interventional, open-label study. The primary outcome was Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) score recorded at two months post-injection with RHA1. Questionnaires were used to evaluate both subject and investigator satisfaction. Skin quality parameters were measured with standard equipment and the VISIA® CANFIELD imaging system. Safety assessment covered adverse events, injection site pain and common treatment responses (CTRs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary endpoint was met, with 92.7% of subjects exhibiting GAIS improvement two months after receiving RHA1 treatment for SLs. Subsequent treatment with R1 doubled the \"very satisfied\" rate compared to RHA1 alone at 6 months. Subjects also reported prolonged skin firmness, smoothness, and bounce, along with a refreshed feeling. No serious adverse events were reported during the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RHA1 was effective for skin beautification in all indications, including SLs, and subsequent R1 treatment improved performance. Both treatments were well tolerated. These findings highlight the potential benefits of using a combined treatment approach to improve skin quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Skin quality affects facial attractiveness, which can significantly impact self-esteem and overall quality of life. The preferred fillers for enhancing skin quality are non-crosslinked or slightly crosslinked HA gels, such as RHA1 and R1, as they diffuse more easily into peripheral tissues.

Objectives: This study was designed to assess the performance and safety of RHA1 treatment for fine lines, such as smiling lines (SLs), including an exploratory arm assessing the performance of subsequent R1 treatments.

Methods: SKINQARE was a prospective, multicenter, low-interventional, open-label study. The primary outcome was Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) score recorded at two months post-injection with RHA1. Questionnaires were used to evaluate both subject and investigator satisfaction. Skin quality parameters were measured with standard equipment and the VISIA® CANFIELD imaging system. Safety assessment covered adverse events, injection site pain and common treatment responses (CTRs).

Results: The primary endpoint was met, with 92.7% of subjects exhibiting GAIS improvement two months after receiving RHA1 treatment for SLs. Subsequent treatment with R1 doubled the "very satisfied" rate compared to RHA1 alone at 6 months. Subjects also reported prolonged skin firmness, smoothness, and bounce, along with a refreshed feeling. No serious adverse events were reported during the study.

Conclusions: RHA1 was effective for skin beautification in all indications, including SLs, and subsequent R1 treatment improved performance. Both treatments were well tolerated. These findings highlight the potential benefits of using a combined treatment approach to improve skin quality.

使用两种透明质酸真皮填充剂序贯治疗提高皮肤质量:一项前瞻性、多中心、介入性研究。
背景:皮肤质量影响面部吸引力,从而显著影响自尊和整体生活质量。改善皮肤质量的首选填充剂是非交联或轻度交联的透明质酸凝胶,如RHA1和R1,因为它们更容易扩散到周围组织。目的:本研究旨在评估RHA1治疗细纹(如微笑纹)的性能和安全性,包括评估后续R1治疗的性能的探索性研究。方法:SKINQARE是一项前瞻性、多中心、低介入、开放标签的研究。主要终点是注射RHA1后2个月的GAIS评分。使用问卷来评估受试者和研究者的满意度。使用标准设备和VISIA®CANFIELD成像系统测量皮肤质量参数。安全性评估包括不良事件、注射部位疼痛和常见治疗反应(CTRs)。结果:主要终点达到了,92.7%的受试者在接受RHA1治疗后两个月GAIS有所改善。6个月时,R1治疗的“非常满意”率比单独使用RHA1治疗的“非常满意”率翻了一番。受试者还报告说,皮肤紧致、光滑、有弹性的时间延长了,同时还有一种清新的感觉。研究期间未见严重不良事件的报道。结论:RHA1对包括SLs在内的所有适应症的皮肤美化均有效,随后的R1治疗可改善性能。两种治疗方法均耐受良好。这些发现强调了使用联合治疗方法改善皮肤质量的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信