Alex S Huang, Jalil Jalili, Evan Walker, Robert N Weinreb, Steven S Laurie, Brandon R Macias, Mark Christopher
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence Deep Learning Models to Predict Spaceflight Associated Neuro-ocular Syndrome (SANS).","authors":"Alex S Huang, Jalil Jalili, Evan Walker, Robert N Weinreb, Steven S Laurie, Brandon R Macias, Mark Christopher","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.06.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To create deep learning artificial intelligence (AI) models for predicting the development of Spaceflight Associated Neuro-ocular Syndrome (SANS) using OCT imaging of the optic nerve head (ONH).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective Analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>AI deep learning models were trained to predict SANS onset by using two OCT datasets: pre- and inflight OCT images acquired from astronauts (flight data) and pre- and in-bedrest images from research participants undergoing head-down tilt bedrest (HDTBR) as an Earth-bound model of SANS (ground data). Both datasets were partitioned by participant into training and testing data. Resnet50-based models were trained using exclusively flight data, exclusively ground data, and a combination of both. All models were evaluated based on their ability to predict SANS using only preflight or pre-bedrest imaging in both datasets. Performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) areas under the curve (AUC). Class activation maps (CAMs) were generated to identify impactful image regions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model trained on flight data achieved an AUC (95% CI) of 0.82 (0.54 - 1.0) on flight data and 0.67 (0.51 - 0.83) on ground data. The ground-trained model achieved an AUC of 0.71 (0.50 - 0.91) on ground data and 0.76 (0.51 - 0.91) on flight data. The combined model achieved an AUC of 0.81 (0.53 - 0.95) and 0.72 (0.52 - 0.92) on flight and ground data, respectively. CAMs identified peripapillary regions of the nerve fiber layer, retinal pigmented epithelium, and anterior lamina surface as most important for predictions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI models can predict SANS based on preflight OCT imaging with moderate-to-high performance even in this data limited setting. The performance of cross-trained models and similarity in CAMs suggests similarity between SANS-related changes in flight and ground datasets, proving further support that HDTBR is a reasonable Earth-bound model for SANS.</p>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.06.009","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To create deep learning artificial intelligence (AI) models for predicting the development of Spaceflight Associated Neuro-ocular Syndrome (SANS) using OCT imaging of the optic nerve head (ONH).
Design: Retrospective Analysis.
Methods: AI deep learning models were trained to predict SANS onset by using two OCT datasets: pre- and inflight OCT images acquired from astronauts (flight data) and pre- and in-bedrest images from research participants undergoing head-down tilt bedrest (HDTBR) as an Earth-bound model of SANS (ground data). Both datasets were partitioned by participant into training and testing data. Resnet50-based models were trained using exclusively flight data, exclusively ground data, and a combination of both. All models were evaluated based on their ability to predict SANS using only preflight or pre-bedrest imaging in both datasets. Performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) areas under the curve (AUC). Class activation maps (CAMs) were generated to identify impactful image regions.
Results: The model trained on flight data achieved an AUC (95% CI) of 0.82 (0.54 - 1.0) on flight data and 0.67 (0.51 - 0.83) on ground data. The ground-trained model achieved an AUC of 0.71 (0.50 - 0.91) on ground data and 0.76 (0.51 - 0.91) on flight data. The combined model achieved an AUC of 0.81 (0.53 - 0.95) and 0.72 (0.52 - 0.92) on flight and ground data, respectively. CAMs identified peripapillary regions of the nerve fiber layer, retinal pigmented epithelium, and anterior lamina surface as most important for predictions.
Conclusion: AI models can predict SANS based on preflight OCT imaging with moderate-to-high performance even in this data limited setting. The performance of cross-trained models and similarity in CAMs suggests similarity between SANS-related changes in flight and ground datasets, proving further support that HDTBR is a reasonable Earth-bound model for SANS.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect.
The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports.
Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.