A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of abatacept for the treatment of relapsing, non-severe, granulomatosis with polyangiitis.

IF 11.4 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Carol A Langford, Nader Khalidi, Jason Springer, Marcia Friedman, Bernhard Hellmich, Christian Pagnoux, Natasha Dehghan, Ora Gewurz-Singer, Curry L Koening, Yih Chang Lin, Paul A Monach, Larry W Moreland, Aurore Fifi-Mah, Oliver Flossmann, Lindsy J Forbess, Peter Lanyon, Eamonn Molloy, Ulrich Specks, Robert Spiera, Elaine Yacyshyn, Carol A McAlear, Cristina Burroughs, Rachel B Jones, Rennie L Rhee, Rula Hajj-Ali, Kenneth J Warrington, David Cuthbertson, Jeffrey P Krischer, David Jayne, Peter A Merkel
{"title":"A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of abatacept for the treatment of relapsing, non-severe, granulomatosis with polyangiitis.","authors":"Carol A Langford, Nader Khalidi, Jason Springer, Marcia Friedman, Bernhard Hellmich, Christian Pagnoux, Natasha Dehghan, Ora Gewurz-Singer, Curry L Koening, Yih Chang Lin, Paul A Monach, Larry W Moreland, Aurore Fifi-Mah, Oliver Flossmann, Lindsy J Forbess, Peter Lanyon, Eamonn Molloy, Ulrich Specks, Robert Spiera, Elaine Yacyshyn, Carol A McAlear, Cristina Burroughs, Rachel B Jones, Rennie L Rhee, Rula Hajj-Ali, Kenneth J Warrington, David Cuthbertson, Jeffrey P Krischer, David Jayne, Peter A Merkel","doi":"10.1002/art.43272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy of abatacept to placebo for the treatment of relapsing, non-severe granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter trial, eligible patients with relapsing, non-severe GPA were randomized to receive abatacept 125 mg subcutaneously once a week or placebo, both together with prednisone 30 mg/day (or equivalent), tapered and discontinued at week 12. Patients already taking methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate, or leflunomide continued this medication at a stable dose. Patients achieving remission remained on their randomized assignment until relapse, early termination, or the common close date 12 months after enrollment of the last patient. Those who had a non-severe relapse, non-severe worsening, or were not in remission by month 6 had the option to receive open-label abatacept. The primary endpoint was the rate of treatment failure, defined as relapse, disease worsening, or failure to achieve a BVAS/WG=0 or 1 by 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-five patients were randomized, 34 received abatacept and 31 placebo. No statistical difference in the treatment failure rate was found between those who received abatacept compared to placebo (p= 0.853). Treatment with abatacept did not demonstrate any statistical difference from placebo in key secondary endpoints, including time to full remission (BVAS/WG=0), duration of glucocorticoid-free remission, relapse severity, prevention of damage, or patient-reported quality-of life outcomes. There was no difference in the frequency or severity of adverse events between treatment arms, including infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with relapsing, non-severe GPA abatacept did not reduce the risk of relapse, severe worsening, or failure to achieve remission.</p>","PeriodicalId":129,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis & Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis & Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/art.43272","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of abatacept to placebo for the treatment of relapsing, non-severe granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA).

Methods: In this multicenter trial, eligible patients with relapsing, non-severe GPA were randomized to receive abatacept 125 mg subcutaneously once a week or placebo, both together with prednisone 30 mg/day (or equivalent), tapered and discontinued at week 12. Patients already taking methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate, or leflunomide continued this medication at a stable dose. Patients achieving remission remained on their randomized assignment until relapse, early termination, or the common close date 12 months after enrollment of the last patient. Those who had a non-severe relapse, non-severe worsening, or were not in remission by month 6 had the option to receive open-label abatacept. The primary endpoint was the rate of treatment failure, defined as relapse, disease worsening, or failure to achieve a BVAS/WG=0 or 1 by 6 months.

Results: Sixty-five patients were randomized, 34 received abatacept and 31 placebo. No statistical difference in the treatment failure rate was found between those who received abatacept compared to placebo (p= 0.853). Treatment with abatacept did not demonstrate any statistical difference from placebo in key secondary endpoints, including time to full remission (BVAS/WG=0), duration of glucocorticoid-free remission, relapse severity, prevention of damage, or patient-reported quality-of life outcomes. There was no difference in the frequency or severity of adverse events between treatment arms, including infection.

Conclusions: In patients with relapsing, non-severe GPA abatacept did not reduce the risk of relapse, severe worsening, or failure to achieve remission.

阿巴接受治疗复发性非严重肉芽肿伴多血管炎的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
目的:比较阿巴接受与安慰剂治疗复发性非重度肉芽肿性多血管炎(GPA)的疗效。方法:在这项多中心试验中,符合条件的复发性非严重GPA患者随机接受阿巴接受125mg皮下注射,每周一次或安慰剂,同时接受强的松30mg /天(或同等剂量),逐渐减少并在第12周停止治疗。已经服用甲氨蝶呤、硫唑嘌呤、霉酚酸酯或来氟米特的患者继续服用稳定剂量的甲氨蝶呤。获得缓解的患者继续进行随机分配,直到复发、早期终止或最后一名患者入组后12个月的常见截止日期。那些非严重复发,非严重恶化,或在第6个月前没有缓解的患者可以选择接受开放标签abataccept。主要终点是治疗失败率,定义为复发、疾病恶化或在6个月前未能达到BVAS/WG=0或1。结果:65例患者随机分组,34例接受阿巴接受治疗,31例接受安慰剂治疗。阿巴接受组与安慰剂组治疗失败率无统计学差异(p= 0.853)。abatacept治疗在关键次要终点上与安慰剂没有统计学差异,包括达到完全缓解的时间(BVAS/WG=0)、无糖皮质激素缓解的持续时间、复发严重程度、损害预防或患者报告的生活质量结局。治疗组之间不良事件发生的频率和严重程度没有差异,包括感染。结论:在复发的患者中,非严重GPA abataccept并没有降低复发、严重恶化或未能达到缓解的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthritis & Rheumatology
Arthritis & Rheumatology RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
20.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
371
期刊介绍: Arthritis & Rheumatology is the official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and focuses on the natural history, pathophysiology, treatment, and outcome of rheumatic diseases. It is a peer-reviewed publication that aims to provide the highest quality basic and clinical research in this field. The journal covers a wide range of investigative areas and also includes review articles, editorials, and educational material for researchers and clinicians. Being recognized as a leading research journal in rheumatology, Arthritis & Rheumatology serves the global community of rheumatology investigators and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信