Quantitative Proteomic Analysis Unveils Protein Concentration Effects in Neat Urine Compared to Urine Extracellular Vesicles

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Stephanie Fang-Tzu Kuo*, Sukhdeep Spall, Samantha I. Emery-Corbin, Ahmed Mohamed, Toby Dite, Kevin Chow, Peter Hughes, Laura F. Dagley and Andrew I. Webb*, 
{"title":"Quantitative Proteomic Analysis Unveils Protein Concentration Effects in Neat Urine Compared to Urine Extracellular Vesicles","authors":"Stephanie Fang-Tzu Kuo*,&nbsp;Sukhdeep Spall,&nbsp;Samantha I. Emery-Corbin,&nbsp;Ahmed Mohamed,&nbsp;Toby Dite,&nbsp;Kevin Chow,&nbsp;Peter Hughes,&nbsp;Laura F. Dagley and Andrew I. Webb*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Urine proteomics and extracellular vesicle (EV) research have emerged as promising fields for biomarker discovery. While urine protein concentration is known to influence proteomics and EV isolation, its effect on both of these combined remains unclear. This study compares proteomic signatures between neat urine and EV-enriched urine in two protein concentration groups (≤0.50 and &gt;0.5 g/L) using two EV enrichment methods. Data-independent acquisition (DIA) was employed for mass spectrometry (MS) proteomic analysis. At low-protein concentrations, neat urine yielded a richer proteome, identifying more proteins, including EV-associated proteins, compared to enriched urine. At high-protein concentrations, neat urine showed reduced protein identification, while enrichment improved the detection of unique proteins and decreased the relative abundance of high-abundance proteins. These findings suggest that, based on (MS)-based proteomics with DIA (DIA-MS), neat urine is a superior source of potential biomarkers at low-protein concentrations, whereas at high-protein concentrations, EV enrichment effectively standardizes signatures for better proteome detection. This study highlights the impact of urine protein concentration on discovery proteomics and the importance of tailoring methodologies to different sample characteristics in biomarker discovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":48,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Proteome Research","volume":"24 7","pages":"3343–3355"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Proteome Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00060","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urine proteomics and extracellular vesicle (EV) research have emerged as promising fields for biomarker discovery. While urine protein concentration is known to influence proteomics and EV isolation, its effect on both of these combined remains unclear. This study compares proteomic signatures between neat urine and EV-enriched urine in two protein concentration groups (≤0.50 and >0.5 g/L) using two EV enrichment methods. Data-independent acquisition (DIA) was employed for mass spectrometry (MS) proteomic analysis. At low-protein concentrations, neat urine yielded a richer proteome, identifying more proteins, including EV-associated proteins, compared to enriched urine. At high-protein concentrations, neat urine showed reduced protein identification, while enrichment improved the detection of unique proteins and decreased the relative abundance of high-abundance proteins. These findings suggest that, based on (MS)-based proteomics with DIA (DIA-MS), neat urine is a superior source of potential biomarkers at low-protein concentrations, whereas at high-protein concentrations, EV enrichment effectively standardizes signatures for better proteome detection. This study highlights the impact of urine protein concentration on discovery proteomics and the importance of tailoring methodologies to different sample characteristics in biomarker discovery.

Abstract Image

定量蛋白质组学分析揭示了与尿细胞外囊泡相比,尿液中蛋白质浓度的影响。
尿液蛋白质组学和细胞外囊泡(EV)研究已成为生物标志物发现的有前途的领域。虽然已知尿蛋白浓度会影响蛋白质组学和EV分离,但其对两者的影响尚不清楚。本研究采用两种EV富集方法,比较了两种蛋白质浓度组(≤0.50和>0.5 g/L)纯尿和EV富集尿的蛋白质组学特征。采用数据独立采集(DIA)进行质谱(MS)蛋白质组学分析。在低蛋白浓度下,与富集的尿液相比,纯净的尿液产生了更丰富的蛋白质组,识别出更多的蛋白质,包括ev相关蛋白质。在高蛋白浓度下,净尿显示蛋白质识别降低,而富集提高了独特蛋白的检测,降低了高丰度蛋白的相对丰度。这些发现表明,基于(MS)与DIA (DIA-MS)的蛋白质组学,在低蛋白浓度下,尿液是潜在生物标志物的优越来源,而在高蛋白浓度下,EV富集有效地标准化了标记,从而更好地进行蛋白质组检测。这项研究强调了尿蛋白浓度对发现蛋白质组学的影响,以及在生物标志物发现中针对不同样品特征定制方法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Proteome Research
Journal of Proteome Research 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
251
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Proteome Research publishes content encompassing all aspects of global protein analysis and function, including the dynamic aspects of genomics, spatio-temporal proteomics, metabonomics and metabolomics, clinical and agricultural proteomics, as well as advances in methodology including bioinformatics. The theme and emphasis is on a multidisciplinary approach to the life sciences through the synergy between the different types of "omics".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信