Stephanie Fang-Tzu Kuo*, Sukhdeep Spall, Samantha I. Emery-Corbin, Ahmed Mohamed, Toby Dite, Kevin Chow, Peter Hughes, Laura F. Dagley and Andrew I. Webb*,
{"title":"Quantitative Proteomic Analysis Unveils Protein Concentration Effects in Neat Urine Compared to Urine Extracellular Vesicles","authors":"Stephanie Fang-Tzu Kuo*, Sukhdeep Spall, Samantha I. Emery-Corbin, Ahmed Mohamed, Toby Dite, Kevin Chow, Peter Hughes, Laura F. Dagley and Andrew I. Webb*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Urine proteomics and extracellular vesicle (EV) research have emerged as promising fields for biomarker discovery. While urine protein concentration is known to influence proteomics and EV isolation, its effect on both of these combined remains unclear. This study compares proteomic signatures between neat urine and EV-enriched urine in two protein concentration groups (≤0.50 and >0.5 g/L) using two EV enrichment methods. Data-independent acquisition (DIA) was employed for mass spectrometry (MS) proteomic analysis. At low-protein concentrations, neat urine yielded a richer proteome, identifying more proteins, including EV-associated proteins, compared to enriched urine. At high-protein concentrations, neat urine showed reduced protein identification, while enrichment improved the detection of unique proteins and decreased the relative abundance of high-abundance proteins. These findings suggest that, based on (MS)-based proteomics with DIA (DIA-MS), neat urine is a superior source of potential biomarkers at low-protein concentrations, whereas at high-protein concentrations, EV enrichment effectively standardizes signatures for better proteome detection. This study highlights the impact of urine protein concentration on discovery proteomics and the importance of tailoring methodologies to different sample characteristics in biomarker discovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":48,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Proteome Research","volume":"24 7","pages":"3343–3355"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Proteome Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00060","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Urine proteomics and extracellular vesicle (EV) research have emerged as promising fields for biomarker discovery. While urine protein concentration is known to influence proteomics and EV isolation, its effect on both of these combined remains unclear. This study compares proteomic signatures between neat urine and EV-enriched urine in two protein concentration groups (≤0.50 and >0.5 g/L) using two EV enrichment methods. Data-independent acquisition (DIA) was employed for mass spectrometry (MS) proteomic analysis. At low-protein concentrations, neat urine yielded a richer proteome, identifying more proteins, including EV-associated proteins, compared to enriched urine. At high-protein concentrations, neat urine showed reduced protein identification, while enrichment improved the detection of unique proteins and decreased the relative abundance of high-abundance proteins. These findings suggest that, based on (MS)-based proteomics with DIA (DIA-MS), neat urine is a superior source of potential biomarkers at low-protein concentrations, whereas at high-protein concentrations, EV enrichment effectively standardizes signatures for better proteome detection. This study highlights the impact of urine protein concentration on discovery proteomics and the importance of tailoring methodologies to different sample characteristics in biomarker discovery.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Proteome Research publishes content encompassing all aspects of global protein analysis and function, including the dynamic aspects of genomics, spatio-temporal proteomics, metabonomics and metabolomics, clinical and agricultural proteomics, as well as advances in methodology including bioinformatics. The theme and emphasis is on a multidisciplinary approach to the life sciences through the synergy between the different types of "omics".