“There's no need for that at this age:” White parents' approaches to and avoidance of discussions of inequality with early adolescents

IF 4.6 2区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Kimy Peterson, Kate C. McLean, Myranda Gardner, Caitlyn Steiner, Katelyn Weyer, Laura Klem, Citlalli Ocampo-Bernal, Antonya M. Gonzalez
{"title":"“There's no need for that at this age:” White parents' approaches to and avoidance of discussions of inequality with early adolescents","authors":"Kimy Peterson,&nbsp;Kate C. McLean,&nbsp;Myranda Gardner,&nbsp;Caitlyn Steiner,&nbsp;Katelyn Weyer,&nbsp;Laura Klem,&nbsp;Citlalli Ocampo-Bernal,&nbsp;Antonya M. Gonzalez","doi":"10.1111/jora.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many White Americans believe inequality is due to controllable causes, such as individual effort or good choices, and these beliefs are linked to the perpetuation of inequality. The current research examines the intergenerational transmission of beliefs about inequality from parents to adolescents. We collected data from a sample of 220 White American parents of 11–13-year-olds and examined how they would explain wealth and racial inequality to their adolescents, as well as how often they have inequality-relevant discussions with their adolescents in everyday life. In their hypothetical explanations, parents tended to attribute wealth and racial disparities to factors beyond individual control, except when explaining their own inheritance. Additionally, they made similar attributions when considering both wealth and racial inequality. We also found that conservative parents were more likely to provide controllable explanations for inequality than liberal parents, and parents who identified as a sexual minority were more likely to provide uncontrollable explanations for inequality than heterosexual parents. In contrast, when reporting their real-life conversations with adolescents, more parents discussed the value of hard work as compared to structural barriers to inequality and racial disparities. Many parents rationalized their decision not to discuss these issues with their children, citing explanations such as their child's age or the topic not coming up. In conclusion, despite some parents' preference for using uncontrollable explanations for inequality in hypothetical discussions, parents may hesitate to discuss these explanations in everyday life.</p>","PeriodicalId":17026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Adolescence","volume":"35 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research on Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jora.70042","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many White Americans believe inequality is due to controllable causes, such as individual effort or good choices, and these beliefs are linked to the perpetuation of inequality. The current research examines the intergenerational transmission of beliefs about inequality from parents to adolescents. We collected data from a sample of 220 White American parents of 11–13-year-olds and examined how they would explain wealth and racial inequality to their adolescents, as well as how often they have inequality-relevant discussions with their adolescents in everyday life. In their hypothetical explanations, parents tended to attribute wealth and racial disparities to factors beyond individual control, except when explaining their own inheritance. Additionally, they made similar attributions when considering both wealth and racial inequality. We also found that conservative parents were more likely to provide controllable explanations for inequality than liberal parents, and parents who identified as a sexual minority were more likely to provide uncontrollable explanations for inequality than heterosexual parents. In contrast, when reporting their real-life conversations with adolescents, more parents discussed the value of hard work as compared to structural barriers to inequality and racial disparities. Many parents rationalized their decision not to discuss these issues with their children, citing explanations such as their child's age or the topic not coming up. In conclusion, despite some parents' preference for using uncontrollable explanations for inequality in hypothetical discussions, parents may hesitate to discuss these explanations in everyday life.

“在这个年龄,没有必要这样做:”白人父母对待和避免与早期青少年讨论不平等的方式
许多美国白人认为,不平等是由可控的原因造成的,比如个人的努力或好的选择,而这些信念与不平等的延续有关。目前的研究考察了关于不平等的观念从父母到青少年的代际传递。我们收集了220名11 - 13岁孩子的美国白人父母的样本数据,并研究了他们如何向青少年解释财富和种族不平等,以及他们在日常生活中与青少年讨论不平等相关问题的频率。在他们的假设解释中,父母倾向于将财富和种族差异归因于个人无法控制的因素,除了解释自己的遗传。此外,在考虑财富和种族不平等时,他们也做出了类似的归因。我们还发现,保守的父母比开明的父母更有可能为不平等提供可控的解释,而被认定为性少数的父母比异性恋父母更有可能为不平等提供不可控的解释。相比之下,当报告他们与青少年的现实对话时,更多的父母讨论了努力工作的价值,而不是不平等和种族差异的结构性障碍。许多父母为自己不与孩子讨论这些问题的决定找到了合理的解释,比如孩子的年龄或话题没有出现。综上所述,尽管一些家长倾向于在假设性讨论中使用不可控的不平等解释,但在日常生活中讨论这些解释时,父母可能会犹豫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Multidisciplinary and international in scope, the Journal of Research on Adolescence (JRA) significantly advances knowledge in the field of adolescent research. Employing a diverse array of methodologies, this compelling journal publishes original research and integrative reviews of the highest level of scholarship. Featured studies include both quantitative and qualitative methodologies applied to cognitive, physical, emotional, and social development and behavior. Articles pertinent to the variety of developmental patterns inherent throughout adolescence are featured, including cross-national and cross-cultural studies. Attention is given to normative patterns of behavior as well as individual differences rooted in personal or social and cultural factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信