{"title":"Optimization of radiation protection in head computed tomography: A study of SSDE based on Deff, Dw and organ dose","authors":"Zouhir Saga , Mayssae Touil , Mohammed Talbi , Abdellah Rezzouk , Abdelaali Rahmouni","doi":"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.113069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aims of this study is to compare water-equivalent diameter (Dw) and effective diameter (Deff) for automated estimation of eye lens dose in head CT, with the goal of determining which metric provides greater accuracy for protocol optimization. A total of 109 patients (women: 38 %; men: 62 %) with a mean age of 59 ± 9 years were included in the study. These parameters were assessed on DICOM images using Indose CT software with an automatic method. Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) were calculated, and mean effective doses (ED) were estimated for both diameters. Additionally, the radiation dose received by sensitive organs, such as the eyes, was measured. The results show that Dw is slightly higher than Deff, with mean values of 15.24 ± 1.23 cm for Dw compared to 14.24 ± 1.08 cm for Deff (r = 0.901, p < 0.0001). SSDE reveals that the uncertainty obtained with Deff is 7.03 %, whereas it is reduced to 4.58 % when using Dw, indicating better accuracy (r = 0.969, p < 0.001). Regarding the mean effective dose, the values were 1.75 ± 0.37 mSv for Deff and 1.71 ± 0.36 mSv for Dw. Sensitive organs, such as the eyes, received a mean radiation dose of 42.43 ± 4.99 mGy. Overall, the use of Dw improves the accuracy of dosimetric estimates compared to Deff, enabling better dose assessments for radiosensitive organs like the eyes. This highlights the importance of integrating Dw into CT imaging protocols to minimize radiation exposure while maintaining optimal diagnostic quality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20861,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","volume":"237 ","pages":"Article 113069"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X25005614","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aims of this study is to compare water-equivalent diameter (Dw) and effective diameter (Deff) for automated estimation of eye lens dose in head CT, with the goal of determining which metric provides greater accuracy for protocol optimization. A total of 109 patients (women: 38 %; men: 62 %) with a mean age of 59 ± 9 years were included in the study. These parameters were assessed on DICOM images using Indose CT software with an automatic method. Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) were calculated, and mean effective doses (ED) were estimated for both diameters. Additionally, the radiation dose received by sensitive organs, such as the eyes, was measured. The results show that Dw is slightly higher than Deff, with mean values of 15.24 ± 1.23 cm for Dw compared to 14.24 ± 1.08 cm for Deff (r = 0.901, p < 0.0001). SSDE reveals that the uncertainty obtained with Deff is 7.03 %, whereas it is reduced to 4.58 % when using Dw, indicating better accuracy (r = 0.969, p < 0.001). Regarding the mean effective dose, the values were 1.75 ± 0.37 mSv for Deff and 1.71 ± 0.36 mSv for Dw. Sensitive organs, such as the eyes, received a mean radiation dose of 42.43 ± 4.99 mGy. Overall, the use of Dw improves the accuracy of dosimetric estimates compared to Deff, enabling better dose assessments for radiosensitive organs like the eyes. This highlights the importance of integrating Dw into CT imaging protocols to minimize radiation exposure while maintaining optimal diagnostic quality.
期刊介绍:
Radiation Physics and Chemistry is a multidisciplinary journal that provides a medium for publication of substantial and original papers, reviews, and short communications which focus on research and developments involving ionizing radiation in radiation physics, radiation chemistry and radiation processing.
The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. This could include papers that are very similar to previous publications, only with changed target substrates, employed materials, analyzed sites and experimental methods, report results without presenting new insights and/or hypothesis testing, or do not focus on the radiation effects.