Optimization of radiation protection in head computed tomography: A study of SSDE based on Deff, Dw and organ dose

IF 2.8 3区 物理与天体物理 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Zouhir Saga , Mayssae Touil , Mohammed Talbi , Abdellah Rezzouk , Abdelaali Rahmouni
{"title":"Optimization of radiation protection in head computed tomography: A study of SSDE based on Deff, Dw and organ dose","authors":"Zouhir Saga ,&nbsp;Mayssae Touil ,&nbsp;Mohammed Talbi ,&nbsp;Abdellah Rezzouk ,&nbsp;Abdelaali Rahmouni","doi":"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.113069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aims of this study is to compare water-equivalent diameter (Dw) and effective diameter (Deff) for automated estimation of eye lens dose in head CT, with the goal of determining which metric provides greater accuracy for protocol optimization. A total of 109 patients (women: 38 %; men: 62 %) with a mean age of 59 ± 9 years were included in the study. These parameters were assessed on DICOM images using Indose CT software with an automatic method. Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) were calculated, and mean effective doses (ED) were estimated for both diameters. Additionally, the radiation dose received by sensitive organs, such as the eyes, was measured. The results show that Dw is slightly higher than Deff, with mean values of 15.24 ± 1.23 cm for Dw compared to 14.24 ± 1.08 cm for Deff (r = 0.901, p &lt; 0.0001). SSDE reveals that the uncertainty obtained with Deff is 7.03 %, whereas it is reduced to 4.58 % when using Dw, indicating better accuracy (r = 0.969, p &lt; 0.001). Regarding the mean effective dose, the values were 1.75 ± 0.37 mSv for Deff and 1.71 ± 0.36 mSv for Dw. Sensitive organs, such as the eyes, received a mean radiation dose of 42.43 ± 4.99 mGy. Overall, the use of Dw improves the accuracy of dosimetric estimates compared to Deff, enabling better dose assessments for radiosensitive organs like the eyes. This highlights the importance of integrating Dw into CT imaging protocols to minimize radiation exposure while maintaining optimal diagnostic quality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20861,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","volume":"237 ","pages":"Article 113069"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X25005614","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aims of this study is to compare water-equivalent diameter (Dw) and effective diameter (Deff) for automated estimation of eye lens dose in head CT, with the goal of determining which metric provides greater accuracy for protocol optimization. A total of 109 patients (women: 38 %; men: 62 %) with a mean age of 59 ± 9 years were included in the study. These parameters were assessed on DICOM images using Indose CT software with an automatic method. Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) were calculated, and mean effective doses (ED) were estimated for both diameters. Additionally, the radiation dose received by sensitive organs, such as the eyes, was measured. The results show that Dw is slightly higher than Deff, with mean values of 15.24 ± 1.23 cm for Dw compared to 14.24 ± 1.08 cm for Deff (r = 0.901, p < 0.0001). SSDE reveals that the uncertainty obtained with Deff is 7.03 %, whereas it is reduced to 4.58 % when using Dw, indicating better accuracy (r = 0.969, p < 0.001). Regarding the mean effective dose, the values were 1.75 ± 0.37 mSv for Deff and 1.71 ± 0.36 mSv for Dw. Sensitive organs, such as the eyes, received a mean radiation dose of 42.43 ± 4.99 mGy. Overall, the use of Dw improves the accuracy of dosimetric estimates compared to Deff, enabling better dose assessments for radiosensitive organs like the eyes. This highlights the importance of integrating Dw into CT imaging protocols to minimize radiation exposure while maintaining optimal diagnostic quality.
基于Deff、Dw和器官剂量的头部计算机断层扫描辐射防护优化研究
本研究的目的是比较水当量直径(Dw)和有效直径(Deff)在头部CT中自动估计眼睛透镜剂量,目的是确定哪种度量为方案优化提供更高的准确性。109例患者(女性:38%;男性:62%),平均年龄59±9岁。使用Indose CT软件在DICOM图像上自动评估这些参数。计算尺寸特异性剂量估计值(SSDE),并估计两种直径的平均有效剂量(ED)。此外,还测量了敏感器官(如眼睛)接受的辐射剂量。结果表明,Dw略高于Deff, Dw的平均值为15.24±1.23 cm, Deff的平均值为14.24±1.08 cm (r = 0.901, p <;0.0001)。SSDE结果表明,使用Deff获得的不确定度为7.03%,而使用Dw获得的不确定度降至4.58%,精度更高(r = 0.969, p <;0.001)。Deff和Dw的平均有效剂量分别为1.75±0.37 mSv和1.71±0.36 mSv。敏感器官(如眼睛)的平均辐射剂量为42.43±4.99 mGy。总的来说,与Deff相比,Dw的使用提高了剂量学估计的准确性,能够更好地评估像眼睛这样的放射敏感器官的剂量。这突出了将Dw整合到CT成像方案中的重要性,以尽量减少辐射暴露,同时保持最佳的诊断质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiation Physics and Chemistry
Radiation Physics and Chemistry 化学-核科学技术
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
17.20%
发文量
574
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Physics and Chemistry is a multidisciplinary journal that provides a medium for publication of substantial and original papers, reviews, and short communications which focus on research and developments involving ionizing radiation in radiation physics, radiation chemistry and radiation processing. The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. This could include papers that are very similar to previous publications, only with changed target substrates, employed materials, analyzed sites and experimental methods, report results without presenting new insights and/or hypothesis testing, or do not focus on the radiation effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信