Effects of different feeding strategies on the performance and meat quality of pigeon squabs (Columba livia) in the late stage of growth

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
T.W. Liu , J.Y. Chen , J.G. Zhu , L.X. Wang , X.M. Meng , H.X. Huan , Y. Liu , P. Xie
{"title":"Effects of different feeding strategies on the performance and meat quality of pigeon squabs (Columba livia) in the late stage of growth","authors":"T.W. Liu ,&nbsp;J.Y. Chen ,&nbsp;J.G. Zhu ,&nbsp;L.X. Wang ,&nbsp;X.M. Meng ,&nbsp;H.X. Huan ,&nbsp;Y. Liu ,&nbsp;P. Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.japr.2025.100561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The current study investigated the effects of two different feeding strategies on the performance and meat quality of squabs (White King pigeon). A total of 108, 21-day-old squabs were randomly divided into three artificial crop milk treatments with different crude protein (<strong>CP</strong>) levels (14%, 15%, 16%). The parent-fed squab control treatment consisted of 36 pairs of pigeons caring for 2 squabs. Results showed that the 28-day body weight, average body weight gain, index of abdominal fat and breast muscle, muscle shearing force, and fiber cross-sectional area and diameter of squabs in group 1 (16% CP) were the highest. In addition, the low dripping and freezing losses and the minimum malondialdehyde content of muscles in group 1 (16 % CP) were observed. Meanwhile, the activity of glutathione peroxidase in the muscle of the control group was the lowest. The values of redness and yellowness of muscles were higher in the control group than those in the artificial feeding treatments. In conclusion, although the muscle color of artificially fed pigeons is not as good as that of naturally fed ones, the 16% CP artificial diet significantly promoted the growth performance and muscle antioxidant capacity of squabs. Therefore, using 16% CP level of diet for artificially feeding squabs during the late stage of growth is recommended.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Poultry Research","volume":"34 3","pages":"Article 100561"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Poultry Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056617125000455","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study investigated the effects of two different feeding strategies on the performance and meat quality of squabs (White King pigeon). A total of 108, 21-day-old squabs were randomly divided into three artificial crop milk treatments with different crude protein (CP) levels (14%, 15%, 16%). The parent-fed squab control treatment consisted of 36 pairs of pigeons caring for 2 squabs. Results showed that the 28-day body weight, average body weight gain, index of abdominal fat and breast muscle, muscle shearing force, and fiber cross-sectional area and diameter of squabs in group 1 (16% CP) were the highest. In addition, the low dripping and freezing losses and the minimum malondialdehyde content of muscles in group 1 (16 % CP) were observed. Meanwhile, the activity of glutathione peroxidase in the muscle of the control group was the lowest. The values of redness and yellowness of muscles were higher in the control group than those in the artificial feeding treatments. In conclusion, although the muscle color of artificially fed pigeons is not as good as that of naturally fed ones, the 16% CP artificial diet significantly promoted the growth performance and muscle antioxidant capacity of squabs. Therefore, using 16% CP level of diet for artificially feeding squabs during the late stage of growth is recommended.
不同饲养策略对生长后期鸽雏生产性能和肉品质的影响
本研究研究了两种不同饲养策略对乳鸽生产性能和肉品质的影响。试验选用21日龄的108只乳鸽,随机分为粗蛋白质(CP)水平分别为14%、15%和16%的3种人工作物乳处理。母饲乳鸽对照组为36对鸽,照顾2只乳鸽。结果表明:1组(16% CP)乳鸽28日体重、平均增重、腹脂肪和胸肌指数、肌肉剪切力、纤维截面积和直径均最高;此外,观察到1组(16% CP)肌肉滴损和冷冻损失低,丙二醛含量最低。同时,对照组肌肉中谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶活性最低。对照组肌肉的红、黄度值均高于人工喂养组。由此可见,虽然人工饲养的鸽子肌肉颜色不如自然饲养的鸽子,但16% CP的人工饲粮显著提高了乳鸽的生长性能和肌肉抗氧化能力。因此,建议在生长后期使用16%粗蛋白质水平的饲粮进行人工饲养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Poultry Research
Journal of Applied Poultry Research 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
80
审稿时长
104 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Poultry Research (JAPR) publishes original research reports, field reports, and reviews on breeding, hatching, health and disease, layer management, meat bird processing and products, meat bird management, microbiology, food safety, nutrition, environment, sanitation, welfare, and economics. As of January 2020, JAPR will become an Open Access journal with no subscription charges, meaning authors who publish here can make their research immediately, permanently, and freely accessible worldwide while retaining copyright to their work. Papers submitted for publication after October 1, 2019 will be published as Open Access papers. The readers of JAPR are in education, extension, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, veterinary medicine, management, production, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Nutritionists, breeder flock supervisors, production managers, microbiologists, laboratory personnel, food safety and sanitation managers, poultry processing managers, feed manufacturers, and egg producers use JAPR to keep up with current applied poultry research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信