Victor Enmanuel Rodas Arano , Lara Mota Corinto , Jean Marcos Pereira dos Santos Reis , Milson Evaldo Serafim , Sérgio Henrique Godinho Silva , Samara Martins Barbosa , Bruno Montoani Silva
{"title":"Proximal sensors fusion and machine learning algorithm combined to improve soil compaction prediction","authors":"Victor Enmanuel Rodas Arano , Lara Mota Corinto , Jean Marcos Pereira dos Santos Reis , Milson Evaldo Serafim , Sérgio Henrique Godinho Silva , Samara Martins Barbosa , Bruno Montoani Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.compag.2025.110609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Predicting adverse factors in agricultural production, like excessive soil compaction, is crucial for taking preventive measures that reduce costs, drying time, environmental contamination from chemical analyses, and the need for destructive sampling methods. Therefore, our objective was to predict soil compaction by evaluating regression and classification models using Random Forest algorithms based on the integration of a wide range of proximal sensors. A total of 56 undisturbed soil samples were collected in PVC cylinders from two soil types: Anionic Acrudox (LVdf) and Typical Hapludox (LVAd), and subjected to five compaction levels (70 %, 80 %, 90 %, 100 %, 110 %) under laboratory conditions. During the experiment, 475 measurements were performed using one X-ray emission sensor, three electrical property sensors, and volumetric water content was estimated from saturation to drying. This process generated 9,025 observations across 19 sensor-derived variables. By integrating the sensors, robust and accurate regression models were developed using Random Forest algorithms to predict compaction degree, with R<sup>2</sup> = 0.93 when combining both soils and LVdf (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.79; RMSE = 7.18) and LVAd (RMSE = 6.35). Excluding water content did not significantly reduce model accuracy but altered the importance of certain variables such as Fe, Si, Ti, and Zn. The pXRF was better at predicting compaction compared to electrical sensors, achieving an R<sup>2</sup> = 0.78 for LVdf and LVAd. Classification models also performed well, reaching an overall accuracy of 0.92 (Kappa = 0.89), and Kappa values of 0.86 for LVdf and 0.74 for LVAd. Sensor fusion allowed variable analysis without disturbing soil structure, supporting potential large-scale spatial modeling for broader applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50627,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","volume":"237 ","pages":"Article 110609"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016816992500715X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Predicting adverse factors in agricultural production, like excessive soil compaction, is crucial for taking preventive measures that reduce costs, drying time, environmental contamination from chemical analyses, and the need for destructive sampling methods. Therefore, our objective was to predict soil compaction by evaluating regression and classification models using Random Forest algorithms based on the integration of a wide range of proximal sensors. A total of 56 undisturbed soil samples were collected in PVC cylinders from two soil types: Anionic Acrudox (LVdf) and Typical Hapludox (LVAd), and subjected to five compaction levels (70 %, 80 %, 90 %, 100 %, 110 %) under laboratory conditions. During the experiment, 475 measurements were performed using one X-ray emission sensor, three electrical property sensors, and volumetric water content was estimated from saturation to drying. This process generated 9,025 observations across 19 sensor-derived variables. By integrating the sensors, robust and accurate regression models were developed using Random Forest algorithms to predict compaction degree, with R2 = 0.93 when combining both soils and LVdf (R2 = 0.79; RMSE = 7.18) and LVAd (RMSE = 6.35). Excluding water content did not significantly reduce model accuracy but altered the importance of certain variables such as Fe, Si, Ti, and Zn. The pXRF was better at predicting compaction compared to electrical sensors, achieving an R2 = 0.78 for LVdf and LVAd. Classification models also performed well, reaching an overall accuracy of 0.92 (Kappa = 0.89), and Kappa values of 0.86 for LVdf and 0.74 for LVAd. Sensor fusion allowed variable analysis without disturbing soil structure, supporting potential large-scale spatial modeling for broader applications.
期刊介绍:
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture provides international coverage of advancements in computer hardware, software, electronic instrumentation, and control systems applied to agricultural challenges. Encompassing agronomy, horticulture, forestry, aquaculture, and animal farming, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, and applications notes. It explores the use of computers and electronics in plant or animal agricultural production, covering topics like agricultural soils, water, pests, controlled environments, and waste. The scope extends to on-farm post-harvest operations and relevant technologies, including artificial intelligence, sensors, machine vision, robotics, networking, and simulation modeling. Its companion journal, Smart Agricultural Technology, continues the focus on smart applications in production agriculture.