Consumption and effectiveness of anthelmintic-medicated block supplements for the treatment of trichostrongyle nematodes in a northern Great Plains Bison Herd

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q2 PARASITOLOGY
Michael B. Hildreth , John B. McKenzie , Matthew A. Branan , Tseganesh T. Hailemariam , Jeff M. Martin
{"title":"Consumption and effectiveness of anthelmintic-medicated block supplements for the treatment of trichostrongyle nematodes in a northern Great Plains Bison Herd","authors":"Michael B. Hildreth ,&nbsp;John B. McKenzie ,&nbsp;Matthew A. Branan ,&nbsp;Tseganesh T. Hailemariam ,&nbsp;Jeff M. Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.vetpar.2025.110521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In high numbers, trichostrongyle nematodes decrease productivity and cause health problems in ruminants including North American bison (<em>Bison bison</em>). Treatment strategies used to limit their impact in cattle are also being used by bison producers, including free-choice group-treatments either as the sole option or in combination with squeeze chute treatments. There have been no published studies evaluating the efficacy of free-choice anthelmintic strategies for bison under pasture conditions, and so the present study evaluated the effectiveness of fenbendazole-medicated multinutrient blocks using 56 pastured bison from South Dakota that were naturally infected with trichostrongyles. Consumption comparisons between non-medicated protein-based multinutrient blocks and those based on molasses found that bison eventually consumed roughly similar amounts, but that consumption increased more quickly for the protein-based blocks. Therefore, Safe-Guard® (fenbendazole) Free-choice Protein Blocks were used for the efficacy study and were added to the pasture for 10 days. Consumption rates were similar to non-medicated rates and consistent with recommendations for cattle. Based upon 154 pre-treatment and 168 post-treatment fecal samples collected daily for 7 days before and 7 days after treatment, there was a 95 % reduction (with 90 % confidence interval ranging from approximately 90–98 %) in fecal egg counts resulting from the treatment. This study showed that substantial trichostrongyle reductions can be achieved among grazing plains bison herds through the use of Safe-Guard® blocks. While effective, the increased risk for developing anthelmintic resistance from chronic underdosing requires that free-choice products be used only occasionally to solve health issues until management strategies can be improved.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23716,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary parasitology","volume":"338 ","pages":"Article 110521"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304401725001323","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In high numbers, trichostrongyle nematodes decrease productivity and cause health problems in ruminants including North American bison (Bison bison). Treatment strategies used to limit their impact in cattle are also being used by bison producers, including free-choice group-treatments either as the sole option or in combination with squeeze chute treatments. There have been no published studies evaluating the efficacy of free-choice anthelmintic strategies for bison under pasture conditions, and so the present study evaluated the effectiveness of fenbendazole-medicated multinutrient blocks using 56 pastured bison from South Dakota that were naturally infected with trichostrongyles. Consumption comparisons between non-medicated protein-based multinutrient blocks and those based on molasses found that bison eventually consumed roughly similar amounts, but that consumption increased more quickly for the protein-based blocks. Therefore, Safe-Guard® (fenbendazole) Free-choice Protein Blocks were used for the efficacy study and were added to the pasture for 10 days. Consumption rates were similar to non-medicated rates and consistent with recommendations for cattle. Based upon 154 pre-treatment and 168 post-treatment fecal samples collected daily for 7 days before and 7 days after treatment, there was a 95 % reduction (with 90 % confidence interval ranging from approximately 90–98 %) in fecal egg counts resulting from the treatment. This study showed that substantial trichostrongyle reductions can be achieved among grazing plains bison herds through the use of Safe-Guard® blocks. While effective, the increased risk for developing anthelmintic resistance from chronic underdosing requires that free-choice products be used only occasionally to solve health issues until management strategies can be improved.
在大平原北部野牛群中,驱虫药物块状补剂治疗毛线虫的消耗和有效性
在大量的情况下,三角线虫会降低生产力,并导致包括北美野牛在内的反刍动物的健康问题。用于限制其对牛的影响的治疗策略也被野牛生产者使用,包括自由选择的群体治疗,要么作为唯一的选择,要么与挤压槽治疗相结合。目前还没有发表的研究评估放牧条件下自由选择驱虫剂策略对野牛的有效性,因此本研究以56头自然感染毛线虫的南达科他州放牧野牛为研究对象,评估了芬苯达唑多营养素块的有效性。对非药物蛋白质多营养素块和基于糖蜜的多营养素块的消费量进行比较发现,野牛最终消耗的量大致相当,但蛋白质多营养素块的消费量增加得更快。因此,使用Safe-Guard®(芬苯达唑)自由选择蛋白块进行功效研究,并在牧场中添加10天。消耗量与未用药的消耗量相似,与对牛的建议一致。根据在治疗前7天和治疗后7天每天收集的154个预处理前和168个处理后粪便样本,处理后的粪蛋数量减少了95% %(90 %的置信区间约为90 - 98 %)。这项研究表明,通过使用安全防护®块,可以在放牧平原野牛群中实现大量的三角龙减少。虽然有效,但由于长期剂量不足而产生驱虫抗药性的风险增加,因此在管理战略得到改善之前,只能偶尔使用自由选择的产品来解决健康问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary parasitology
Veterinary parasitology 农林科学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
126
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The journal Veterinary Parasitology has an open access mirror journal,Veterinary Parasitology: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. This journal is concerned with those aspects of helminthology, protozoology and entomology which are of interest to animal health investigators, veterinary practitioners and others with a special interest in parasitology. Papers of the highest quality dealing with all aspects of disease prevention, pathology, treatment, epidemiology, and control of parasites in all domesticated animals, fall within the scope of the journal. Papers of geographically limited (local) interest which are not of interest to an international audience will not be accepted. Authors who submit papers based on local data will need to indicate why their paper is relevant to a broader readership. Parasitological studies on laboratory animals fall within the scope of the journal only if they provide a reasonably close model of a disease of domestic animals. Additionally the journal will consider papers relating to wildlife species where they may act as disease reservoirs to domestic animals, or as a zoonotic reservoir. Case studies considered to be unique or of specific interest to the journal, will also be considered on occasions at the Editors'' discretion. Papers dealing exclusively with the taxonomy of parasites do not fall within the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信