Bridging the proton gap: A proton therapy consultation service for Canadian radiation oncologists

Q1 Nursing
Inhwa Kim , Amy Parent , Michael Holwell , Tim Craig , Patricia Lindsay , Hillary Le , Yat Tsang , Perry B. Johnson , Danny J. Indelicato , Fei-Fei Liu , Derek S. Tsang
{"title":"Bridging the proton gap: A proton therapy consultation service for Canadian radiation oncologists","authors":"Inhwa Kim ,&nbsp;Amy Parent ,&nbsp;Michael Holwell ,&nbsp;Tim Craig ,&nbsp;Patricia Lindsay ,&nbsp;Hillary Le ,&nbsp;Yat Tsang ,&nbsp;Perry B. Johnson ,&nbsp;Danny J. Indelicato ,&nbsp;Fei-Fei Liu ,&nbsp;Derek S. Tsang","doi":"10.1016/j.tipsro.2025.100320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Canada is the only G7 country without a clinical proton beam therapy (PBT) facility. Patients can access publicly funded PBT through provincial out-of-country approval programs. We created a consultation service to inform health care providers regarding the potential dosimetric benefits of PBT.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed patients referred to our proton consultation service from June 2020 to December 2024. Pencil beam scanning proton plans were generated in the RayStation treatment planning system. Key dosimetric parameters were evaluated using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 55 patients were referred to our service, and 49 had evaluable plans. Patients were referred from 6 provinces and 11 institutions across Canada. The median age at referral was 36 (range, 3–74 years), and 29 % of patients were pediatric. The most common reasons for referral were young age (33 %) and proximity of tumour to OARs (37 %). Target coverage was similar in both photon and proton plans. Cranial (n = 19) and thoracic (n = 7) plans showed a statistically significant reduction in mean brain dose (p &lt; 0.001), mean brain dose minus PTV (p &lt; 0.001), brain D50% (p &lt; 0.001), mean lung dose (p = 0.02), lung V50% (p = 0.02), and lung D50% (p = 0.02) with proton therapy. Sixteen patients were approved by their provincial Ministry of Health for PBT in the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our proton consultation program provides an important service by identifying patients where PBT offers a dosimetric advantage over photon therapy. Following this personalized, data-informed approach, nearly a third of referred patients were approved to go to the US for PBT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36328,"journal":{"name":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632425000216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Canada is the only G7 country without a clinical proton beam therapy (PBT) facility. Patients can access publicly funded PBT through provincial out-of-country approval programs. We created a consultation service to inform health care providers regarding the potential dosimetric benefits of PBT.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients referred to our proton consultation service from June 2020 to December 2024. Pencil beam scanning proton plans were generated in the RayStation treatment planning system. Key dosimetric parameters were evaluated using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test.

Results

A total of 55 patients were referred to our service, and 49 had evaluable plans. Patients were referred from 6 provinces and 11 institutions across Canada. The median age at referral was 36 (range, 3–74 years), and 29 % of patients were pediatric. The most common reasons for referral were young age (33 %) and proximity of tumour to OARs (37 %). Target coverage was similar in both photon and proton plans. Cranial (n = 19) and thoracic (n = 7) plans showed a statistically significant reduction in mean brain dose (p < 0.001), mean brain dose minus PTV (p < 0.001), brain D50% (p < 0.001), mean lung dose (p = 0.02), lung V50% (p = 0.02), and lung D50% (p = 0.02) with proton therapy. Sixteen patients were approved by their provincial Ministry of Health for PBT in the United States.

Conclusion

Our proton consultation program provides an important service by identifying patients where PBT offers a dosimetric advantage over photon therapy. Following this personalized, data-informed approach, nearly a third of referred patients were approved to go to the US for PBT.
弥合质子鸿沟:加拿大放射肿瘤学家的质子治疗咨询服务
加拿大是七国集团中唯一没有临床质子束治疗(PBT)设施的国家。患者可以通过省级境外审批项目获得公共资助的PBT。我们创建了一个咨询服务,告知卫生保健提供者关于PBT的潜在剂量学益处。材料和方法我们回顾性分析了2020年6月至2024年12月期间就诊于我们质子咨询服务的患者。在RayStation治疗计划系统中生成铅笔束扫描质子计划。使用Wilcoxon配对对有符号秩检验评估关键剂量学参数。结果55例患者转诊,49例方案可评价。患者来自加拿大6个省和11个机构。转诊时的中位年龄为36岁(范围3-74岁),29%的患者为儿科。最常见的转诊原因是年轻(33%)和肿瘤靠近OARs(37%)。光子计划和质子计划的目标覆盖范围相似。颅(n = 19)和胸(n = 7)计划显示平均脑剂量降低具有统计学意义(p <;0.001),平均脑剂量减去PTV (p <;0.001),脑部D50% (p <;0.001),平均肺剂量(p = 0.02),肺V50% (p = 0.02),肺D50% (p = 0.02)。在美国,16名患者经其所在省卫生部批准接受PBT治疗。结论我们的质子咨询项目提供了重要的服务,通过确定PBT比光子治疗具有剂量学优势的患者。遵循这种个性化的、数据知情的方法,近三分之一的转诊患者被批准前往美国进行PBT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
67 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信