Twenty years of red tourism research: A systematic literature review using the theories-contexts-characteristics-methods framework

IF 7.3 2区 管理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Terrence Tsz Hei Kong, Runqi Zou, Honggen Xiao
{"title":"Twenty years of red tourism research: A systematic literature review using the theories-contexts-characteristics-methods framework","authors":"Terrence Tsz Hei Kong,&nbsp;Runqi Zou,&nbsp;Honggen Xiao","doi":"10.1016/j.tmp.2025.101390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous red tourism reviews fall short of evaluating the theoretical foundations, contexts, characteristics and methods of existing literature. Through employing the Theories-Contexts-Characteristics-Methods framework, this paper is the first systematic review that synthesized 279 CSSCI Chinese-written and 30 English-written empirical research articles. It provides a snapshot of the state-of-the-art of red tourism scholarship to highlight extant knowledge gaps. Results show that research questions on red tourism exhibit a dominant managerial focus over the past 20 years. Most of the studies failed to address core attributes that make red heritage distinctive, including identity, emotions, memories, sense of place and power dynamics. This review also shows that the theoretical foundation of red tourism research is weak and fragmented. Most deployed theories are human-centric, which marginalizes red heritage and its endogenous attributes. Furthermore, current red tourism literature principally examines general domestic tourists and tangible heritage sites. Residents who are carriers of red memories and cultural practices, inbound tourists, adolescents and intangible red cultural heritage and traditions were overlooked. Drawing from critical heritage studies, this review contributes to red tourism and heritage tourism studies by suggesting new theoretical lenses (e.g., storytelling and post-anthropocentrism). Novel research questions that go beyond the current overreliance on specific research contexts are provided, complemented with a list of possible new methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48141,"journal":{"name":"Tourism Management Perspectives","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101390"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tourism Management Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211973625000558","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous red tourism reviews fall short of evaluating the theoretical foundations, contexts, characteristics and methods of existing literature. Through employing the Theories-Contexts-Characteristics-Methods framework, this paper is the first systematic review that synthesized 279 CSSCI Chinese-written and 30 English-written empirical research articles. It provides a snapshot of the state-of-the-art of red tourism scholarship to highlight extant knowledge gaps. Results show that research questions on red tourism exhibit a dominant managerial focus over the past 20 years. Most of the studies failed to address core attributes that make red heritage distinctive, including identity, emotions, memories, sense of place and power dynamics. This review also shows that the theoretical foundation of red tourism research is weak and fragmented. Most deployed theories are human-centric, which marginalizes red heritage and its endogenous attributes. Furthermore, current red tourism literature principally examines general domestic tourists and tangible heritage sites. Residents who are carriers of red memories and cultural practices, inbound tourists, adolescents and intangible red cultural heritage and traditions were overlooked. Drawing from critical heritage studies, this review contributes to red tourism and heritage tourism studies by suggesting new theoretical lenses (e.g., storytelling and post-anthropocentrism). Novel research questions that go beyond the current overreliance on specific research contexts are provided, complemented with a list of possible new methods.
红色旅游研究二十年:理论-语境-特征-方法框架的系统文献综述
以往的红色旅游评论缺乏对现有文献的理论基础、语境、特征和方法的评价。本文采用理论-语境-特征-方法框架,综合了279篇CSSCI中文论文和30篇英文论文的实证研究,首次进行了系统综述。它提供了最新的红色旅游奖学金的快照,以突出现有的知识差距。结果表明,红色旅游的研究问题是近20年来管理研究的重点。大多数研究未能解决使红色遗产与众不同的核心属性,包括身份、情感、记忆、地方感和权力动态。红色旅游研究的理论基础薄弱、支离破碎。大多数部署的理论都是以人为中心的,这将红色遗产及其内生属性边缘化。此外,目前的红色旅游文献主要考察一般国内游客和有形遗产遗址。作为红色记忆和文化习俗载体的居民、入境游客、青少年和非物质红色文化遗产和传统被忽视。从批判性遗产研究中,本文通过提出新的理论视角(例如,讲故事和后人类中心主义)为红色旅游和遗产旅游研究做出了贡献。提供了超越当前过度依赖特定研究背景的新颖研究问题,并补充了一系列可能的新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
99
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Tourism Management Perspectives is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on the planning and management of travel and tourism. It covers topics such as tourist experiences, their consequences for communities, economies, and environments, the creation of image, the shaping of tourist experiences and perceptions, and the management of tourist organizations and destinations. The journal's editorial board consists of experienced international professionals and it shares the board with Tourism Management. The journal covers socio-cultural, technological, planning, and policy aspects of international, national, and regional tourism, as well as specific management studies. It encourages papers that introduce new research methods and critique existing ones in the context of tourism research. The journal publishes empirical research articles and high-quality review articles on important topics and emerging themes that enhance the theoretical and conceptual understanding of key areas within travel and tourism management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信