Jinhai Yu , Qinghe Zhao , Shengyan Ding , Zaihui Yu , Yi Liu
{"title":"Gully development drives sediment transport efficiency of forest road-stream pathways in mountainous watershed","authors":"Jinhai Yu , Qinghe Zhao , Shengyan Ding , Zaihui Yu , Yi Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2025.109229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forest roads are a major source of sediment in many mountainous watersheds. The majority of road-eroded sediment is transported to streams via different kinds of pathways (e.g., gullied, partially gullied, and diffuse pathways) on the road-stream hillslopes, which leads to serious hydrological and ecological consequences both on-site and off-site of roads. However, limited research has focused on the transport dynamics of road-eroded sediment on road-stream pathways is crucial for reducing the negative impacts of road erosion. Based on simulated sediment-laden runoff scouring experiments conducted along forest roads in the Xiangchagou watershed located in the Dabie Mountains of China, we examined the effect of gully development of road-stream pathways on the hydrodynamic characteristics and sediment transport characteristics of sediment-laden runoff with different concentrations (0, 5, 10 and 15 g L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) by manually setting pathways with different gully proportions (0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80% and 100%) on the road-stream hillslope. The results showed that as gully development increased, average runoff velocity and energy grew exponentially, while runoff power and shear stress displayed linear increases. The road-stream pathways with fully developed gullies exhibited greater hydrodynamic forces of sediment-laden runoff. In addition, the degree of gully development significantly impacted sediment erosion–deposition ratio (SER, dimensionless parameter) and sediment transport efficiency (STE, %). The SER approached 1 as gully proportions increased, indicating a dynamic balance between erosion and deposition processes, and decreased toward 0 with higher sediment concentrations conversely, at which point sediment deposition dominates the transport process. The STE of road-stream pathways increased linearly with gully development and decreased with higher sediment concentrations indicating that both jointly affect STE. Ultimately, we developed a prediction model (STE = 0.575 – 0.014S<sub>C</sub> + 0.490G<sub>P</sub>, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.915, <em>p</em> < 0.05) to estimate the STE of road-stream pathways for sediment-laden runoff. These findings provide a basis of evidence for reducing the transport of eroded sediment from forest roads to streams in mountainous watershed from the perspective of controlling gully development of transport pathways.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"258 ","pages":"Article 109229"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816225005314","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Forest roads are a major source of sediment in many mountainous watersheds. The majority of road-eroded sediment is transported to streams via different kinds of pathways (e.g., gullied, partially gullied, and diffuse pathways) on the road-stream hillslopes, which leads to serious hydrological and ecological consequences both on-site and off-site of roads. However, limited research has focused on the transport dynamics of road-eroded sediment on road-stream pathways is crucial for reducing the negative impacts of road erosion. Based on simulated sediment-laden runoff scouring experiments conducted along forest roads in the Xiangchagou watershed located in the Dabie Mountains of China, we examined the effect of gully development of road-stream pathways on the hydrodynamic characteristics and sediment transport characteristics of sediment-laden runoff with different concentrations (0, 5, 10 and 15 g L−1) by manually setting pathways with different gully proportions (0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80% and 100%) on the road-stream hillslope. The results showed that as gully development increased, average runoff velocity and energy grew exponentially, while runoff power and shear stress displayed linear increases. The road-stream pathways with fully developed gullies exhibited greater hydrodynamic forces of sediment-laden runoff. In addition, the degree of gully development significantly impacted sediment erosion–deposition ratio (SER, dimensionless parameter) and sediment transport efficiency (STE, %). The SER approached 1 as gully proportions increased, indicating a dynamic balance between erosion and deposition processes, and decreased toward 0 with higher sediment concentrations conversely, at which point sediment deposition dominates the transport process. The STE of road-stream pathways increased linearly with gully development and decreased with higher sediment concentrations indicating that both jointly affect STE. Ultimately, we developed a prediction model (STE = 0.575 – 0.014SC + 0.490GP, R2 = 0.915, p < 0.05) to estimate the STE of road-stream pathways for sediment-laden runoff. These findings provide a basis of evidence for reducing the transport of eroded sediment from forest roads to streams in mountainous watershed from the perspective of controlling gully development of transport pathways.
期刊介绍:
Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment.
Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.