A study on generalized optimization of energy distribution in electric vehicle hybrid energy storage system for personalized driving style scores

IF 10.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Lin Hu , Qingtao Tian , Jing Huang , Dongjie Zhang , Xianhui Wu , Xiaojian Yi
{"title":"A study on generalized optimization of energy distribution in electric vehicle hybrid energy storage system for personalized driving style scores","authors":"Lin Hu ,&nbsp;Qingtao Tian ,&nbsp;Jing Huang ,&nbsp;Dongjie Zhang ,&nbsp;Xianhui Wu ,&nbsp;Xiaojian Yi","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Balancing battery capacity degradation and system energy loss while optimizing supercapacitor utilization remains a key challenge in hybrid energy storage system (HESS) for electric vehicle (EV). This study proposes a generalized optimization strategy based on personalized driving style scores. Using real-world EV data, Lasso regression identifies key energy consumption parameters for energy distribution control. Principal component analysis (PCA) and K-means clustering are then applied to classify the sample conditions into three driving styles: cautious, standard, and aggressive. The comprehensive scores for sample conditions are normalized to obtain individualized driving style scores, which serve as core indicators of personalized driving characteristics. A significant linear correlation is observed between the driving style scores and both battery capacity degradation and system energy loss. Based on this, a piecewise linear fitting model is constructed to calculate the contributions of battery capacity degradation and system energy loss to the total operational loss for each sample condition. These contributions are mapped to range of optimization weights, generating personalized weights for battery capacity degradation and system energy loss. A generalized weighted optimization cost function is then formulated, which is compatible with various optimization algorithms. Using GWO as an example, the results demonstrate that the proposed weighted optimization strategy reduces the average battery capacity degradation for aggressive driving styles by an additional 8.43% and decreases the average system energy loss for cautious driving styles by an additional 5.09% compared to non-weighted optimization. This enhances the flexibility and applicability of energy distribution in HESS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"341 ","pages":"Article 120047"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890425005710","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Balancing battery capacity degradation and system energy loss while optimizing supercapacitor utilization remains a key challenge in hybrid energy storage system (HESS) for electric vehicle (EV). This study proposes a generalized optimization strategy based on personalized driving style scores. Using real-world EV data, Lasso regression identifies key energy consumption parameters for energy distribution control. Principal component analysis (PCA) and K-means clustering are then applied to classify the sample conditions into three driving styles: cautious, standard, and aggressive. The comprehensive scores for sample conditions are normalized to obtain individualized driving style scores, which serve as core indicators of personalized driving characteristics. A significant linear correlation is observed between the driving style scores and both battery capacity degradation and system energy loss. Based on this, a piecewise linear fitting model is constructed to calculate the contributions of battery capacity degradation and system energy loss to the total operational loss for each sample condition. These contributions are mapped to range of optimization weights, generating personalized weights for battery capacity degradation and system energy loss. A generalized weighted optimization cost function is then formulated, which is compatible with various optimization algorithms. Using GWO as an example, the results demonstrate that the proposed weighted optimization strategy reduces the average battery capacity degradation for aggressive driving styles by an additional 8.43% and decreases the average system energy loss for cautious driving styles by an additional 5.09% compared to non-weighted optimization. This enhances the flexibility and applicability of energy distribution in HESS.
基于个性化驾驶风格评分的电动汽车混合储能系统能量分配广义优化研究
在优化超级电容器利用率的同时平衡电池容量退化和系统能量损失是电动汽车混合储能系统(HESS)面临的关键挑战。本研究提出一种基于个性化驾驶风格评分的广义优化策略。利用真实世界的电动汽车数据,Lasso回归识别能源分配控制的关键能源消耗参数。然后应用主成分分析(PCA)和K-means聚类将样本条件分为三种驾驶风格:谨慎、标准和积极。将样本条件的综合得分归一化,得到个性化驾驶风格得分,作为个性化驾驶特征的核心指标。在驾驶风格得分与电池容量退化和系统能量损失之间观察到显著的线性相关。在此基础上,构建分段线性拟合模型,计算各样本条件下电池容量退化和系统能量损失对总运行损失的贡献。这些贡献被映射到优化权重范围,为电池容量退化和系统能量损失生成个性化权重。提出了一种适用于各种优化算法的广义加权优化代价函数。以GWO为例,结果表明,与非加权优化相比,所提出的加权优化策略使激进驾驶风格下的平均电池容量退化率额外降低了8.43%,使谨慎驾驶风格下的平均系统能量损失额外降低了5.09%。这增强了HESS中能量分配的灵活性和适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信