{"title":"AdditiveLLM: Large language models predict defects in metals additive manufacturing","authors":"Peter Pak , Amir Barati Farimani","doi":"10.1016/j.addlet.2025.100292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this work we investigate the ability of large language models to predict additive manufacturing defect regimes given a set of process parameter inputs. For this task we utilize a process parameter defect dataset to fine-tune a collection of models, titled <em>AdditiveLLM</em>, for the purpose of predicting potential defect regimes including <em>Keyholing</em>, <em>Lack of Fusion</em>, and <em>Balling</em>. We compare different methods of input formatting in order to gauge the model’s performance to correctly predict defect regimes on our sparse <em>Baseline</em> dataset and our natural language <em>Prompt</em> dataset. The model displays robust predictive capability, achieving a <em>Baseline</em> accuracy of 94% and <em>Prompt</em> accuracy of 82% when asked to provide the defect regimes associated with a set of process parameters. The incorporation of natural language input further simplifies the task of process parameters selection, enabling users to identify optimal settings specific to their build.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72068,"journal":{"name":"Additive manufacturing letters","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100292"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Additive manufacturing letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277236902500026X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this work we investigate the ability of large language models to predict additive manufacturing defect regimes given a set of process parameter inputs. For this task we utilize a process parameter defect dataset to fine-tune a collection of models, titled AdditiveLLM, for the purpose of predicting potential defect regimes including Keyholing, Lack of Fusion, and Balling. We compare different methods of input formatting in order to gauge the model’s performance to correctly predict defect regimes on our sparse Baseline dataset and our natural language Prompt dataset. The model displays robust predictive capability, achieving a Baseline accuracy of 94% and Prompt accuracy of 82% when asked to provide the defect regimes associated with a set of process parameters. The incorporation of natural language input further simplifies the task of process parameters selection, enabling users to identify optimal settings specific to their build.
在这项工作中,我们研究了给定一组工艺参数输入的大型语言模型预测增材制造缺陷制度的能力。对于这个任务,我们利用一个过程参数缺陷数据集来微调一组模型,标题为AdditiveLLM,用于预测潜在的缺陷机制,包括Keyholing、Lack of Fusion和Balling。我们比较了不同的输入格式方法,以衡量模型在稀疏基线数据集和自然语言提示数据集上正确预测缺陷制度的性能。该模型显示出强大的预测能力,当要求提供与一组过程参数相关的缺陷制度时,达到94%的基线准确度和82%的提示准确度。自然语言输入的结合进一步简化了过程参数选择的任务,使用户能够确定特定于其构建的最佳设置。