Tracking five decades of global sand and gravel stocks and flows in 184 countries

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Shurong Zhuang , Qiance Liu , Kun Sun , Stephan Lutter , Ruishan Chen , Gang Liu
{"title":"Tracking five decades of global sand and gravel stocks and flows in 184 countries","authors":"Shurong Zhuang ,&nbsp;Qiance Liu ,&nbsp;Kun Sun ,&nbsp;Stephan Lutter ,&nbsp;Ruishan Chen ,&nbsp;Gang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sand and gravel, providing essential physical foundations for modern societies, are facing increasing demand due to urbanization and rural construction. This surge stems from the widespread use of these materials in building, roads, and other infrastructure, which has raised increasing concerns about the “sand crisis” and environmental damages from overexploitation. Addressing such concerns requires understanding patterns of global and national sand and gravel cycles, yet this remains hitherto unexplored. Here, we quantified historical stocks and flows of sand and gravel in buildings and infrastructure in 184 world countries from 1970 to 2019. We show that global gravel consumption is more than twice that of global sand consumption, albeit with a more stable growth rate. However, in international trade, sand dominates, with trade volumes 1.9 times larger than those of gravel, and Singapore is the leading importer. This suggests that sand supply is more vulnerable to geopolitical and market fluctuations. Over the past decades, per capita sand in-use stocks have increased in nearly all countries, whereas per capita gravel in-use stocks have saturated or even declined in many industrialized countries. Asia accounted for half of global sand in-use stocks and China has a large share of gravel stocks in residential buildings, both reflecting the impact of urbanization mode. These insights can inform policies for securing sustainable aggregate supply chains, improving resource efficiency, and mitigating environmental risks associated with overexploitation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"222 ","pages":"Article 108460"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925003386","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sand and gravel, providing essential physical foundations for modern societies, are facing increasing demand due to urbanization and rural construction. This surge stems from the widespread use of these materials in building, roads, and other infrastructure, which has raised increasing concerns about the “sand crisis” and environmental damages from overexploitation. Addressing such concerns requires understanding patterns of global and national sand and gravel cycles, yet this remains hitherto unexplored. Here, we quantified historical stocks and flows of sand and gravel in buildings and infrastructure in 184 world countries from 1970 to 2019. We show that global gravel consumption is more than twice that of global sand consumption, albeit with a more stable growth rate. However, in international trade, sand dominates, with trade volumes 1.9 times larger than those of gravel, and Singapore is the leading importer. This suggests that sand supply is more vulnerable to geopolitical and market fluctuations. Over the past decades, per capita sand in-use stocks have increased in nearly all countries, whereas per capita gravel in-use stocks have saturated or even declined in many industrialized countries. Asia accounted for half of global sand in-use stocks and China has a large share of gravel stocks in residential buildings, both reflecting the impact of urbanization mode. These insights can inform policies for securing sustainable aggregate supply chains, improving resource efficiency, and mitigating environmental risks associated with overexploitation.
追踪全球50年来184个国家的砂石储量和流量
砂石是现代社会必不可少的物质基础,由于城市化和农村建设,对砂石的需求日益增加。这种激增源于这些材料在建筑、道路和其他基础设施中的广泛使用,这引起了人们对“沙子危机”和过度开采造成的环境破坏的日益关注。要解决这些问题,需要了解全球和国家的砂砾循环模式,但迄今为止,这方面仍未得到探索。在这里,我们量化了1970年至2019年184个国家建筑和基础设施中砂石的历史储量和流量。我们发现,全球砂石消费量是全球砂石消费量的两倍多,尽管增长率更稳定。然而,在国际贸易中,沙子占主导地位,贸易量是砾石的1.9倍,新加坡是最大的进口国。这表明,沙子供应更容易受到地缘政治和市场波动的影响。在过去几十年中,几乎所有国家的人均使用砂储量都有所增加,而许多工业化国家的人均使用砾石储量已经饱和甚至下降。亚洲的砂石存量占全球的一半,中国的住宅砂石存量占很大比例,都反映了城市化模式的影响。这些见解可以为政策提供信息,以确保可持续的总供应链,提高资源效率,减轻与过度开发相关的环境风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信