Cancer registries in Pakistan: a scoping review

IF 6.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sehar Salim Virani , Kaleem Sohail Ahmed , Megan Springer , Muzamil Hussain , Leslie Christensen , Farah Asif , Shahid Pervez , Zehra Fadoo , Asim Belgaumi , Syed Nabeel Zafar
{"title":"Cancer registries in Pakistan: a scoping review","authors":"Sehar Salim Virani ,&nbsp;Kaleem Sohail Ahmed ,&nbsp;Megan Springer ,&nbsp;Muzamil Hussain ,&nbsp;Leslie Christensen ,&nbsp;Farah Asif ,&nbsp;Shahid Pervez ,&nbsp;Zehra Fadoo ,&nbsp;Asim Belgaumi ,&nbsp;Syed Nabeel Zafar","doi":"10.1016/j.lansea.2025.100615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cancer incidence is increasing globally. Although Pakistan does not have a unified national cancer registry, several institutional and regional cancer registries can provide vital information for cancer planning. Following the Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases and grey literature. Data were extracted regarding registry characteristics, data collection methods, and study details, and findings were summarised narratively to highlight key attributes and data gaps. Of 3714 unique abstracts screened, 102 studies met inclusion criteria, including 92 reporting registry data and 10 describing registry characteristics without patient-level data. Seventeen cancer registries were identified, with varying scope and geographical coverage. Only 19 of Pakistan's 129 cities contribute data to at least one registry. Data collection methods ranged from paper-based forms to advanced software systems. The Karachi Cancer Registry was noted for its high research output. Funding sources were limited, and several registries faced operational challenges. This Review highlights Pakistan's fragmented cancer registry landscape. While important policy-level data can be obtained from existing registries, there is an urgent need for strategic efforts and stakeholder collaboration to establish a national cancer registry system. Such a system could enhance cancer surveillance, inform public health efforts, and serve as a model for similar initiatives in south and southeast Asia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75136,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 100615"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772368225000861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cancer incidence is increasing globally. Although Pakistan does not have a unified national cancer registry, several institutional and regional cancer registries can provide vital information for cancer planning. Following the Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases and grey literature. Data were extracted regarding registry characteristics, data collection methods, and study details, and findings were summarised narratively to highlight key attributes and data gaps. Of 3714 unique abstracts screened, 102 studies met inclusion criteria, including 92 reporting registry data and 10 describing registry characteristics without patient-level data. Seventeen cancer registries were identified, with varying scope and geographical coverage. Only 19 of Pakistan's 129 cities contribute data to at least one registry. Data collection methods ranged from paper-based forms to advanced software systems. The Karachi Cancer Registry was noted for its high research output. Funding sources were limited, and several registries faced operational challenges. This Review highlights Pakistan's fragmented cancer registry landscape. While important policy-level data can be obtained from existing registries, there is an urgent need for strategic efforts and stakeholder collaboration to establish a national cancer registry system. Such a system could enhance cancer surveillance, inform public health efforts, and serve as a model for similar initiatives in south and southeast Asia.
巴基斯坦癌症登记:范围审查
全球癌症发病率正在上升。尽管巴基斯坦没有统一的国家癌症登记处,但一些机构和区域癌症登记处可以为癌症规划提供重要信息。根据乔安娜布里格斯研究所和PRISMA-ScR指南,我们在多个数据库和灰色文献中进行了全面的搜索。提取有关注册表特征、数据收集方法和研究细节的数据,并对研究结果进行叙述总结,以突出关键属性和数据差距。在筛选的3714个独特摘要中,102个研究符合纳入标准,其中92个报告注册中心数据,10个描述注册中心特征,但没有患者水平的数据。确定了17个癌症登记处,其范围和地理覆盖范围各不相同。巴基斯坦129个城市中只有19个至少向一个登记处提供数据。数据收集方法包括从纸质表格到先进的软件系统。卡拉奇癌症登记处以其高研究产出而闻名。资金来源有限,几个登记处面临业务上的挑战。本综述强调了巴基斯坦分散的癌症登记格局。虽然可以从现有的登记处获得重要的政策层面数据,但迫切需要战略努力和利益攸关方的合作,以建立一个国家癌症登记系统。这样一个系统可以加强癌症监测,为公共卫生工作提供信息,并可作为南亚和东南亚类似举措的典范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信