{"title":"Navigating climate policy: Corporate lobbying strategies in response to intensified climate risk exposure","authors":"Anqi Jiao , Ran Sun , Honglin Ren","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines how firms strategically respond to heightened climate risk exposure, with a particular focus on corporate climate lobbying behavior. Our findings reveal a robust positive relation between firm-level climate risk exposure and corporate lobbying efforts on climate-related issues. Among the three climate risk components—regulatory, physical, and opportunity risks—the regulatory risk is the primary driver of the results. Causal relation is established using the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement in 2017 as a shock to firm climate risk exposure. Finally, we show that corporate climate lobbying reduces regulatory fragmentation and increases firms' greenhouse gas emissions. These results together suggest that firms strategically allocate political resources toward climate-related issues in response to climate risks, aiming to manage their exposures to climate risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"148 ","pages":"Article 108667"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325004943","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines how firms strategically respond to heightened climate risk exposure, with a particular focus on corporate climate lobbying behavior. Our findings reveal a robust positive relation between firm-level climate risk exposure and corporate lobbying efforts on climate-related issues. Among the three climate risk components—regulatory, physical, and opportunity risks—the regulatory risk is the primary driver of the results. Causal relation is established using the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement in 2017 as a shock to firm climate risk exposure. Finally, we show that corporate climate lobbying reduces regulatory fragmentation and increases firms' greenhouse gas emissions. These results together suggest that firms strategically allocate political resources toward climate-related issues in response to climate risks, aiming to manage their exposures to climate risks.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.