A comprehensive In-silico analysis of the known and novel synthesized 5-substituted barbituric acid derivatives acting as CNS depressants.

In silico pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-06-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s40203-025-00376-8
Soni Rani, Manisha Behera, Soma Mondal Ghorai, Gagandeep Singh
{"title":"A comprehensive In-silico analysis of the known and novel synthesized 5-substituted barbituric acid derivatives acting as CNS depressants.","authors":"Soni Rani, Manisha Behera, Soma Mondal Ghorai, Gagandeep Singh","doi":"10.1007/s40203-025-00376-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anaesthetics such as barbiturates function as inhibitory-neurotransmitters by attaching to the accessible pockets of the GABA<sub>A</sub> receptors, which function through ligand-gated Cl<sup>-</sup> channels. This study investigates the interaction dynamics between various barbiturate analogues and GABA<sub>A</sub> receptors to identify potential alternatives to phenobarbital with improved therapeutic profiles. The comprehensive ADME/TOX assessments, molecular docking studies, molecular dynamic analysis, binding free energy calculations, and Ion Channel Analysis using Channel Annotation Package were performed to examine the interaction of phenobarbital, 2-thiobarbiturate, and several spirobarbiturate derivatives with GABA<sub>A</sub> receptors. Our findings reveal that molecular docking alone does not predict therapeutic efficacy in modulating chloride transport. Although spirobarbiturates demonstrated strong interactions (particularly methoxy-SB at - 53.20 kcal/mol compared to phenobarbital's - 31.22 kcal/mol), they exhibited suboptimal pharmacokinetic properties, with molecular weights exceeding 500 g/mol, limiting their bioavailability. Notably, 2-thiobarbiturate emerged as the most promising candidate despite its relatively weaker binding affinity (- 27.70 kcal/mol), as it demonstrated stable interactions with all GABA<sub>A</sub> receptor chains, superior intestinal and blood-brain barrier permeability, excellent bioavailability, and minimal toxicity concerns. These results challenge the conventional approach of prioritizing high binding affinity in drug discovery and highlight the importance of balancing moderate binding with optimal channel functionality and favourable ADME/TOX properties. 2-Thiobarbiturate represents a potentially safer alternative to phenobarbital, which is currently classified as a drug of abuse, offering new possibilities for the development of mild antidepressants and hypnotic medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":94038,"journal":{"name":"In silico pharmacology","volume":"13 2","pages":"82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12149386/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In silico pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40203-025-00376-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anaesthetics such as barbiturates function as inhibitory-neurotransmitters by attaching to the accessible pockets of the GABAA receptors, which function through ligand-gated Cl- channels. This study investigates the interaction dynamics between various barbiturate analogues and GABAA receptors to identify potential alternatives to phenobarbital with improved therapeutic profiles. The comprehensive ADME/TOX assessments, molecular docking studies, molecular dynamic analysis, binding free energy calculations, and Ion Channel Analysis using Channel Annotation Package were performed to examine the interaction of phenobarbital, 2-thiobarbiturate, and several spirobarbiturate derivatives with GABAA receptors. Our findings reveal that molecular docking alone does not predict therapeutic efficacy in modulating chloride transport. Although spirobarbiturates demonstrated strong interactions (particularly methoxy-SB at - 53.20 kcal/mol compared to phenobarbital's - 31.22 kcal/mol), they exhibited suboptimal pharmacokinetic properties, with molecular weights exceeding 500 g/mol, limiting their bioavailability. Notably, 2-thiobarbiturate emerged as the most promising candidate despite its relatively weaker binding affinity (- 27.70 kcal/mol), as it demonstrated stable interactions with all GABAA receptor chains, superior intestinal and blood-brain barrier permeability, excellent bioavailability, and minimal toxicity concerns. These results challenge the conventional approach of prioritizing high binding affinity in drug discovery and highlight the importance of balancing moderate binding with optimal channel functionality and favourable ADME/TOX properties. 2-Thiobarbiturate represents a potentially safer alternative to phenobarbital, which is currently classified as a drug of abuse, offering new possibilities for the development of mild antidepressants and hypnotic medications.

对已知和新合成的5-取代巴比妥酸衍生物作为中枢神经系统抑制剂进行了全面的硅分析。
麻醉剂如巴比妥类药物通过附着在GABAA受体可接近的口袋上发挥抑制神经递质的作用,GABAA受体通过配体门控的Cl-通道起作用。本研究调查了各种巴比妥类似物和GABAA受体之间的相互作用动力学,以确定具有改善治疗效果的苯巴比妥的潜在替代品。通过综合的ADME/TOX评估、分子对接研究、分子动力学分析、结合自由能计算和离子通道分析(使用Channel Annotation Package),研究了苯巴比妥、2-硫代巴比妥和几种spirobarbiturate衍生物与GABAA受体的相互作用。我们的研究结果表明,分子对接本身并不能预测调节氯化物运输的治疗效果。尽管螺巴比妥酸盐表现出很强的相互作用(特别是甲氧基sb的- 53.20 kcal/mol,而苯巴比妥的- 31.22 kcal/mol),但它们表现出次优的药代动力学特性,分子量超过500 g/mol,限制了它们的生物利用度。值得注意的是,尽管2-硫代巴比妥的结合亲和力相对较弱(- 27.70 kcal/mol),但它与所有GABAA受体链的相互作用稳定,具有良好的肠和血脑屏障渗透性,良好的生物利用度和最小的毒性问题,因此成为最有希望的候选药物。这些结果挑战了在药物发现中优先考虑高结合亲和力的传统方法,并强调了平衡适度结合与最佳通道功能和有利的ADME/TOX特性的重要性。2-硫代巴比妥代表了比苯巴比妥更安全的替代品,苯巴比妥目前被归类为滥用药物,为开发轻度抗抑郁药和催眠药物提供了新的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信