Embodied decision making in athletes and other animals.

Antonella Maselli, Pierpaolo Iodice, Paul Cisek, Giovanni Pezzulo
{"title":"Embodied decision making in athletes and other animals.","authors":"Antonella Maselli, Pierpaolo Iodice, Paul Cisek, Giovanni Pezzulo","doi":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Humans and other animals continuously make embodied decisions about ongoing or pending courses of action. Examples of embodied decisions include a hunting lioness's decision of which gazelle to chase and a soccer player's decision of which teammate to pass the ball to. The study of embodied decisions has recently gained tractions across several fields, including cognitive psychology, neuroscience, and sports science. Here, we summarize key insights from these studies and highlight that they imply a shift of perspective from viewing decision-making as a central cognitive process largely separated from perception and action dynamics to a more integrative perspective that recognizes its embodied and situated nature. We discuss how embodied decisions can be effectively conceptualized in terms of the parallel specification and selection between available (and future) affordances, i.e., as an \"affordance competition\" process. We discuss studies addressing various aspects of embodied decisions, which include the selection between courses of action, the involvement of motor processes in perceptual and cognitive tasks, motivational factors and the decision of how vigorously and urgently to act. Furthermore, we highlight current controversies in the field and open directions for future work - and their implications for the advancement of our understanding of the mind and the behavior of athletes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94181,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of sport and exercise","volume":" ","pages":"102915"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of sport and exercise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Humans and other animals continuously make embodied decisions about ongoing or pending courses of action. Examples of embodied decisions include a hunting lioness's decision of which gazelle to chase and a soccer player's decision of which teammate to pass the ball to. The study of embodied decisions has recently gained tractions across several fields, including cognitive psychology, neuroscience, and sports science. Here, we summarize key insights from these studies and highlight that they imply a shift of perspective from viewing decision-making as a central cognitive process largely separated from perception and action dynamics to a more integrative perspective that recognizes its embodied and situated nature. We discuss how embodied decisions can be effectively conceptualized in terms of the parallel specification and selection between available (and future) affordances, i.e., as an "affordance competition" process. We discuss studies addressing various aspects of embodied decisions, which include the selection between courses of action, the involvement of motor processes in perceptual and cognitive tasks, motivational factors and the decision of how vigorously and urgently to act. Furthermore, we highlight current controversies in the field and open directions for future work - and their implications for the advancement of our understanding of the mind and the behavior of athletes.

运动员和其他动物的具身决策。
人类和其他动物不断地对正在进行或悬而未决的行动过程做出具体化的决定。具体决策的例子包括一只狩猎的母狮决定追赶哪只瞪羚,一个足球运动员决定把球传给哪位队友。具体化决策的研究最近在几个领域获得了关注,包括认知心理学、神经科学和运动科学。在这里,我们总结了这些研究的关键见解,并强调它们意味着将决策视为一个主要与感知和行动动力学分离的中心认知过程的观点转变为一个更综合的观点,即认识到其具体化和情境性。我们讨论了具体化的决策如何在并行规范和可用(和未来)功能之间的选择方面有效地概念化,即作为“功能竞争”过程。我们讨论了具体决策的各个方面的研究,包括行动方案之间的选择,知觉和认知任务中运动过程的参与,动机因素以及如何积极和紧急地采取行动的决定。此外,我们强调了当前在该领域的争议和未来工作的开放方向-以及它们对我们对运动员思想和行为的理解的进步的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信