Patient Outcomes after Introduction of Novel Myocardial Protection Protocol for Prolonged Aortic Cross-Clamping.

IF 1.3
Masahide Komagamine, Takuma Fukunishi, Yoshiki Yamasaki, Masahiro Tomita, Satoshi Kinebuchi, Daijun Tomimoto, Kan Nawata
{"title":"Patient Outcomes after Introduction of Novel Myocardial Protection Protocol for Prolonged Aortic Cross-Clamping.","authors":"Masahide Komagamine, Takuma Fukunishi, Yoshiki Yamasaki, Masahiro Tomita, Satoshi Kinebuchi, Daijun Tomimoto, Kan Nawata","doi":"10.5761/atcs.oa.25-00079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cardioplegia directly affects patient outcomes after cardiac surgery with prolonged aortic cross-clamping. Our hospital revised its myocardial protection protocol in April 2021 and compared the clinical outcomes of patients with prolonged aortic cross-clamping before versus after the revision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 36 patients who underwent cardiac surgery via a median sternotomy and prolonged aortic cross-clamping for >4 h at our hospital from 2018 to 2024. Patients treated between 2018 and March 2021 (before the protocol revision) were designated as Group 1, while those treated from April 2021 to 2024 (after the revision) were designated as Group 2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Groups 1 and 2 comprised 17 and 19 patients, respectively. The mean creatine kinase level immediately postoperative was significantly lower in Group 2 versus Group 1 (P = 0.018). The mean hospital stay was also significantly shorter in Group 2 versus Group 1 (P = 0.017). Regarding new postoperative right-ventricular dysfunction, there were 3 cases (15.8%) in Group 2 versus 5 cases (29.4%) in Group 1, but the difference was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that our hospital's revised myocardial protection protocol, which requires no alteration of the solution itself, achieves safe and favorable surgical results, even in cardiac surgeries requiring prolonged aortic cross-clamping.</p>","PeriodicalId":93877,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12169755/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.25-00079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Cardioplegia directly affects patient outcomes after cardiac surgery with prolonged aortic cross-clamping. Our hospital revised its myocardial protection protocol in April 2021 and compared the clinical outcomes of patients with prolonged aortic cross-clamping before versus after the revision.

Methods: This study included 36 patients who underwent cardiac surgery via a median sternotomy and prolonged aortic cross-clamping for >4 h at our hospital from 2018 to 2024. Patients treated between 2018 and March 2021 (before the protocol revision) were designated as Group 1, while those treated from April 2021 to 2024 (after the revision) were designated as Group 2.

Results: Groups 1 and 2 comprised 17 and 19 patients, respectively. The mean creatine kinase level immediately postoperative was significantly lower in Group 2 versus Group 1 (P = 0.018). The mean hospital stay was also significantly shorter in Group 2 versus Group 1 (P = 0.017). Regarding new postoperative right-ventricular dysfunction, there were 3 cases (15.8%) in Group 2 versus 5 cases (29.4%) in Group 1, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that our hospital's revised myocardial protection protocol, which requires no alteration of the solution itself, achieves safe and favorable surgical results, even in cardiac surgeries requiring prolonged aortic cross-clamping.

采用新型心肌保护方案治疗延长主动脉交叉夹紧后的患者预后。
目的:心脏停跳直接影响心脏手术后主动脉交叉夹持时间延长患者的预后。我院于2021年4月修订心肌保护方案,比较修订前后主动脉交叉夹持时间延长患者的临床结局。方法:本研究纳入我院2018年至2024年36例经胸骨正中切开术并延长主动脉交叉夹持时间bbbb4 h的心脏手术患者。2018年至2021年3月(方案修订前)治疗的患者被指定为1组,2021年4月至2024年(方案修订后)治疗的患者被指定为2组。结果:1组17例,2组19例。术后即刻肌酸激酶的平均水平2组明显低于1组(P = 0.018)。2组的平均住院时间也明显短于1组(P = 0.017)。术后新发右室功能障碍2组3例(15.8%),1组5例(29.4%),差异无统计学意义。结论:我院修改后的心肌保护方案无需改变溶液本身,即使在需要长时间主动脉交叉夹持的心脏手术中也能获得安全、良好的手术效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信