Olfactory cues elicit species-specific locomotive responses in poison frog tadpoles.

microPublication biology Pub Date : 2025-05-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.17912/micropub.biology.001532
Mina E Phipps, Penelope R Baker, Luise Bachmann, Soyeon Park, Malia J Perez, Shay Nair Sharma, Yvette Soto-Hernandez, Malaya Gaerlan, Marco Carrillo, Sofia Ceva, Sowmya Chundi, Binta Diallo, Juliana N Fong, Kelly Huang, Jennifer Jackson, Jasmine Padilla, Leslie Quintana, Katelyn Santa Maria, Sadie M Sarkisian, Paloma R Sequeira, Eva U Tatlock, Bryan H Juarez, Najva Akbari, Max Madrzyk, Lauren A O'Connell
{"title":"Olfactory cues elicit species-specific locomotive responses in poison frog tadpoles.","authors":"Mina E Phipps, Penelope R Baker, Luise Bachmann, Soyeon Park, Malia J Perez, Shay Nair Sharma, Yvette Soto-Hernandez, Malaya Gaerlan, Marco Carrillo, Sofia Ceva, Sowmya Chundi, Binta Diallo, Juliana N Fong, Kelly Huang, Jennifer Jackson, Jasmine Padilla, Leslie Quintana, Katelyn Santa Maria, Sadie M Sarkisian, Paloma R Sequeira, Eva U Tatlock, Bryan H Juarez, Najva Akbari, Max Madrzyk, Lauren A O'Connell","doi":"10.17912/micropub.biology.001532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Amphibian species rear their larvae in distinct environments that may influence how they respond to different sensory stimuli. Here, we investigated the olfactory-mediated locomotive responses of two poison frog species ( <i>Allobates femoralis</i> and <i>Ranitomeya imitator</i> ) that vary in life history strategies. We found that <i>A. femoralis</i> tadpoles spent more time near an injury cue compared to control, while <i>R. imitator</i> tadpoles increased their movement in response to high concentrations of amino acids. These experiments were done in an undergraduate laboratory course, demonstrating how simple behavior assays conducted in a classroom setting can provide practical research experiences and new insights into animal behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":74192,"journal":{"name":"microPublication biology","volume":"2025 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152586/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"microPublication biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17912/micropub.biology.001532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amphibian species rear their larvae in distinct environments that may influence how they respond to different sensory stimuli. Here, we investigated the olfactory-mediated locomotive responses of two poison frog species ( Allobates femoralis and Ranitomeya imitator ) that vary in life history strategies. We found that A. femoralis tadpoles spent more time near an injury cue compared to control, while R. imitator tadpoles increased their movement in response to high concentrations of amino acids. These experiments were done in an undergraduate laboratory course, demonstrating how simple behavior assays conducted in a classroom setting can provide practical research experiences and new insights into animal behavior.

嗅觉线索在毒蛙蝌蚪中引起物种特异性的运动反应。
两栖动物在不同的环境中养育它们的幼虫,这可能会影响它们对不同感官刺激的反应。本文研究了两种不同生活史策略的毒蛙(Allobates femoralis和Ranitomeya imitator)嗅觉介导的运动反应。我们发现,与对照组相比,雌蛙蝌蚪在受伤提示附近停留的时间更长,而模仿雌蛙蝌蚪对高浓度氨基酸的反应增加了它们的运动。这些实验是在本科实验课程中完成的,展示了在课堂环境中进行的简单行为分析如何提供实际的研究经验和对动物行为的新见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信