Assessment of cognition in aphasia: Perspectives from clinicians and researchers.

IF 1.7 3区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Bruna Tessaro, Sonia L E Brownsett, Solène Hameau, Tijana Simic, Lyndsey A Nickels, Natalie Gilmore, Claudia Peñaloza, Holly Robson, Christos Salis
{"title":"Assessment of cognition in aphasia: Perspectives from clinicians and researchers.","authors":"Bruna Tessaro, Sonia L E Brownsett, Solène Hameau, Tijana Simic, Lyndsey A Nickels, Natalie Gilmore, Claudia Peñaloza, Holly Robson, Christos Salis","doi":"10.1080/09602011.2025.2506598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People with aphasia may present with cognitive impairments beyond language. In this population, reliance on language-based assessments of cognition may lead to unreliable metrics of cognitive performance across clinical and research settings. We investigated the underlying philosophy and practice of assessing cognition in people with aphasia. An e-survey was developed for multidisciplinary clinicians and researchers. Snowball sampling was used to recruit international participants. The e-survey comprised 29 items (a mix of multiple-choice and open-ended items) addressing definitions of cognition, assessment of cognition, tools used to assess cognition and participant demographics. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. 291 respondents participated from a range of disciplines and countries. Over 80% of respondents considered it important to assess attention, executive functions, learning and memory. The main barrier to assessment was the lack of appropriate tools available for people with aphasia. Responses indicated that whilst professionals felt that understanding the interaction between language and cognition in aphasia was important for providing optimal care. This study highlights the need for better awareness and training in the assessment of cognition in people with aphasia, and for psychometrically robust assessments, appropriate for the assessment of cognition in the presence of aphasia.</p>","PeriodicalId":54729,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2025.2506598","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People with aphasia may present with cognitive impairments beyond language. In this population, reliance on language-based assessments of cognition may lead to unreliable metrics of cognitive performance across clinical and research settings. We investigated the underlying philosophy and practice of assessing cognition in people with aphasia. An e-survey was developed for multidisciplinary clinicians and researchers. Snowball sampling was used to recruit international participants. The e-survey comprised 29 items (a mix of multiple-choice and open-ended items) addressing definitions of cognition, assessment of cognition, tools used to assess cognition and participant demographics. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. 291 respondents participated from a range of disciplines and countries. Over 80% of respondents considered it important to assess attention, executive functions, learning and memory. The main barrier to assessment was the lack of appropriate tools available for people with aphasia. Responses indicated that whilst professionals felt that understanding the interaction between language and cognition in aphasia was important for providing optimal care. This study highlights the need for better awareness and training in the assessment of cognition in people with aphasia, and for psychometrically robust assessments, appropriate for the assessment of cognition in the presence of aphasia.

失语症的认知评估:临床医生和研究人员的观点。
失语症患者可能表现为语言以外的认知障碍。在这一人群中,依赖基于语言的认知评估可能导致临床和研究环境中认知表现的不可靠指标。我们调查了评估失语症患者认知能力的基本理念和实践。为多学科临床医生和研究人员开发了一项电子调查。采用滚雪球抽样方法招募国际参与者。电子调查包括29个项目(多项选择和开放式项目的混合),涉及认知的定义,认知的评估,用于评估认知的工具和参与者的人口统计数据。数据分析采用描述性统计和专题分析。来自不同学科和国家的291名受访者参与了调查。超过80%的受访者认为评估注意力、执行功能、学习和记忆很重要。评估的主要障碍是缺乏对失语症患者可用的适当工具。回应表明,虽然专业人士认为理解失语症中语言和认知之间的相互作用对于提供最佳护理很重要。这项研究强调了在评估失语症患者的认知方面需要更好的认识和培训,以及心理测量学上可靠的评估,适用于评估失语症患者的认知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation publishes human experimental and clinical research related to rehabilitation, recovery of function, and brain plasticity. The journal is aimed at clinicians who wish to inform their practice in the light of the latest scientific research; at researchers in neurorehabilitation; and finally at researchers in cognitive neuroscience and related fields interested in the mechanisms of recovery and rehabilitation. Papers on neuropsychological assessment will be considered, and special topic reviews (2500-5000 words) addressing specific key questions in rehabilitation, recovery and brain plasticity will also be welcomed. The latter will enter a fast-track refereeing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信