A Crossover Trial of Hospital-Wide Lactated Ringer's Solution versus Normal Saline.

IF 96.2 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Lauralyn McIntyre, Dean Fergusson, Tracy McArdle, Shane English, Deborah J Cook, Alison E Fox-Robichaud, Claudio Martin, John Marshall, Michael Pugliese, Kusum Menon, Kednapa Thavorn, Ian D Graham, Steven Hawken, Akshai Iyengar, Kwadwo Kyeremanteng, Raphael Saginur, Andrew J E Seely, Ian G Stiell, Daniel Bainbridge, Charles Weijer, Monica Taljaard
{"title":"A Crossover Trial of Hospital-Wide Lactated Ringer's Solution versus Normal Saline.","authors":"Lauralyn McIntyre, Dean Fergusson, Tracy McArdle, Shane English, Deborah J Cook, Alison E Fox-Robichaud, Claudio Martin, John Marshall, Michael Pugliese, Kusum Menon, Kednapa Thavorn, Ian D Graham, Steven Hawken, Akshai Iyengar, Kwadwo Kyeremanteng, Raphael Saginur, Andrew J E Seely, Ian G Stiell, Daniel Bainbridge, Charles Weijer, Monica Taljaard","doi":"10.1056/NEJMoa2416761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whether lactated Ringer's solution is clinically superior to normal saline for routine intravenous administration of fluids is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In an open-label, two-period, two-sequence, cross-sectional, cluster-randomized, crossover trial, we assigned hospitals in Ontario, Canada, to use either lactated Ringer's solution or normal saline hospital-wide for a period of 12 weeks. After a washout period, hospitals switched to the other fluid for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was a composite of death or readmission to the hospital within 90 days after the index admission. Secondary outcomes were the individual components of the primary outcome, as well as the length of stay in the hospital, initiation of dialysis within 90 days after the index admission, a visit to the emergency department within 90 days, and discharge to a facility other than home. Data on outcomes were obtained from health administrative databases. The analyses were conducted at the hospital level, and the primary estimand was the effect of the use of lactated Ringer's solution as compared with normal saline averaged across all participating hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven hospitals completed both 12-week periods before the trial was interrupted owing to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Data on the primary outcome were available for 43,626 eligible patients. The mean (±SD) incidence of the composite of death or readmission to the hospital within 90 days after the index admission was 20.3±3.5% with lactated Ringer's solution and 21.4±3.3% with normal saline (adjusted difference, -0.53 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -1.85 to 0.79; P = 0.35). Results for all secondary outcomes were consistent with those for the primary outcome. No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A hospital-wide policy to administer lactated Ringer's solution rather than normal saline did not result in a significantly lower incidence of death or readmission to the hospital within 90 days after the index admission. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Ottawa Hospital Academic Medical Organization; FLUID ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04512950.).</p>","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":96.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New England Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2416761","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Whether lactated Ringer's solution is clinically superior to normal saline for routine intravenous administration of fluids is uncertain.

Methods: In an open-label, two-period, two-sequence, cross-sectional, cluster-randomized, crossover trial, we assigned hospitals in Ontario, Canada, to use either lactated Ringer's solution or normal saline hospital-wide for a period of 12 weeks. After a washout period, hospitals switched to the other fluid for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was a composite of death or readmission to the hospital within 90 days after the index admission. Secondary outcomes were the individual components of the primary outcome, as well as the length of stay in the hospital, initiation of dialysis within 90 days after the index admission, a visit to the emergency department within 90 days, and discharge to a facility other than home. Data on outcomes were obtained from health administrative databases. The analyses were conducted at the hospital level, and the primary estimand was the effect of the use of lactated Ringer's solution as compared with normal saline averaged across all participating hospitals.

Results: Seven hospitals completed both 12-week periods before the trial was interrupted owing to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Data on the primary outcome were available for 43,626 eligible patients. The mean (±SD) incidence of the composite of death or readmission to the hospital within 90 days after the index admission was 20.3±3.5% with lactated Ringer's solution and 21.4±3.3% with normal saline (adjusted difference, -0.53 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -1.85 to 0.79; P = 0.35). Results for all secondary outcomes were consistent with those for the primary outcome. No serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: A hospital-wide policy to administer lactated Ringer's solution rather than normal saline did not result in a significantly lower incidence of death or readmission to the hospital within 90 days after the index admission. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Ottawa Hospital Academic Medical Organization; FLUID ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04512950.).

全院乳酸林格氏液与生理盐水的交叉试验
背景:乳酸林格氏液在临床上是否优于生理盐水作为常规静脉输液尚不确定。方法:在一项开放标签、两期、两序列、横断面、集群随机交叉试验中,我们指定加拿大安大略省的医院在全院范围内使用乳酸林格氏液或生理盐水,为期12周。经过一段洗脱期后,医院在12周内改用另一种液体。主要转归是指标入院后90天内死亡或再入院的综合转归。次要结局是主要结局的各个组成部分,以及住院时间、指标入院后90天内开始透析、90天内访问急诊科以及出院到非家庭设施。结果数据来自卫生行政数据库。分析是在医院一级进行的,主要估计是与所有参与医院的平均生理盐水相比,使用乳酸林格氏液的效果。结果:七家医院在试验因2019冠状病毒大流行而中断之前完成了这两个12周的试验。43,626例符合条件的患者获得了主要结局数据。指标入院后90天内死亡或再入院的平均(±SD)发生率乳酸林格液组为20.3±3.5%,生理盐水组为21.4±3.3%(校正差为-0.53个百分点;95%置信区间为-1.85 ~ 0.79;p = 0.35)。所有次要结局的结果与主要结局的结果一致。无严重不良事件报告。结论:全院范围内给予乳酸林格液而不是生理盐水的政策并没有显著降低入院后90天内死亡或再入院的发生率。(由加拿大卫生研究所和渥太华医院学术医疗组织资助;FLUID ClinicalTrials.gov编号:NCT04512950)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
New England Journal of Medicine
New England Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
145.40
自引率
0.60%
发文量
1839
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) stands as the foremost medical journal and website worldwide. With an impressive history spanning over two centuries, NEJM boasts a consistent publication of superb, peer-reviewed research and engaging clinical content. Our primary objective revolves around delivering high-caliber information and findings at the juncture of biomedical science and clinical practice. We strive to present this knowledge in formats that are not only comprehensible but also hold practical value, effectively influencing healthcare practices and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信