Jacob S Hogan, John C Baumann, Neha Vapiwala, Jeff M Michalski, Benjamin W Fischer-Valuck, Patty Karraker, Minesh P Mehta, Jeffrey D Bradley, Brian C Baumann
{"title":"Analysis of Medicare Reimbursement Trends in Medical and Radiation Oncology.","authors":"Jacob S Hogan, John C Baumann, Neha Vapiwala, Jeff M Michalski, Benjamin W Fischer-Valuck, Patty Karraker, Minesh P Mehta, Jeffrey D Bradley, Brian C Baumann","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2025.05.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Radiation and medical oncology face pressure from payment changes, which aim to increase the value of care and curb rising spending. Multiple models have been proposed or implemented, with mixed results for cost saving and financial stability. While previous studies have quantified changes in Medicare reimbursement for radiation oncology on a per-code basis, this has not been done in medical oncology to our knowledge, and no direct comparisons have been made between oncology subspecialties at this level. Our study aims to quantify and analyze Medicare reimbursement changes for medical and radiation oncology billing codes.</p><p><strong>Materials/methods: </strong>In this longitudinal study of reimbursement, the publicly available Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary database was used to obtain Medicare reimbursement data for 2010, 2016, and 2020. All reimbursement for providers with primary provider codes 92 (radiation oncology), 83 (hematology oncology), and 90 (medical oncology) were analyzed, combining hematology and medical oncology. Inflation- and utilization-adjusted changes in reimbursement were calculated from 2010-2020 and 2016-2020 on a per-code basis with results grouped by specialty and billing category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2010-2020, inflation- and utilization-adjusted Medicare reimbursement decreased by $1.2B (-16%) for all codes, $705M (-29%) for radiation oncology-specific codes, and $541M (-10%) for medical oncology-specific codes. From 2016-2020, inflation- and utilization-adjusted reimbursement decreased by $299M (-3%) for all codes, $108M (-5.6%) for radiation oncology-specific codes, and $191M (-2.2%) for medical oncology-specific codes. Chemotherapy (-40%) and radiotherapy (-33%) saw the largest decreases in inflation- and utilization-adjusted reimbursement from 2010-2020, while immunotherapy (+21%) saw the largest increase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our analysis shows continually decreasing Medicare reimbursement for both radiation and medical oncology from 2010-2020 and 2016-2020. This decade-long continuous decline highlights the need for payment system stabilization-whether through episode-based payment models or another avenue.</p>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2025.05.011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Radiation and medical oncology face pressure from payment changes, which aim to increase the value of care and curb rising spending. Multiple models have been proposed or implemented, with mixed results for cost saving and financial stability. While previous studies have quantified changes in Medicare reimbursement for radiation oncology on a per-code basis, this has not been done in medical oncology to our knowledge, and no direct comparisons have been made between oncology subspecialties at this level. Our study aims to quantify and analyze Medicare reimbursement changes for medical and radiation oncology billing codes.
Materials/methods: In this longitudinal study of reimbursement, the publicly available Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary database was used to obtain Medicare reimbursement data for 2010, 2016, and 2020. All reimbursement for providers with primary provider codes 92 (radiation oncology), 83 (hematology oncology), and 90 (medical oncology) were analyzed, combining hematology and medical oncology. Inflation- and utilization-adjusted changes in reimbursement were calculated from 2010-2020 and 2016-2020 on a per-code basis with results grouped by specialty and billing category.
Results: From 2010-2020, inflation- and utilization-adjusted Medicare reimbursement decreased by $1.2B (-16%) for all codes, $705M (-29%) for radiation oncology-specific codes, and $541M (-10%) for medical oncology-specific codes. From 2016-2020, inflation- and utilization-adjusted reimbursement decreased by $299M (-3%) for all codes, $108M (-5.6%) for radiation oncology-specific codes, and $191M (-2.2%) for medical oncology-specific codes. Chemotherapy (-40%) and radiotherapy (-33%) saw the largest decreases in inflation- and utilization-adjusted reimbursement from 2010-2020, while immunotherapy (+21%) saw the largest increase.
Conclusions: Our analysis shows continually decreasing Medicare reimbursement for both radiation and medical oncology from 2010-2020 and 2016-2020. This decade-long continuous decline highlights the need for payment system stabilization-whether through episode-based payment models or another avenue.
期刊介绍:
The overarching mission of Practical Radiation Oncology is to improve the quality of radiation oncology practice. PRO''s purpose is to document the state of current practice, providing background for those in training and continuing education for practitioners, through discussion and illustration of new techniques, evaluation of current practices, and publication of case reports. PRO strives to provide its readers content that emphasizes knowledge "with a purpose." The content of PRO includes:
Original articles focusing on patient safety, quality measurement, or quality improvement initiatives
Original articles focusing on imaging, contouring, target delineation, simulation, treatment planning, immobilization, organ motion, and other practical issues
ASTRO guidelines, position papers, and consensus statements
Essays that highlight enriching personal experiences in caring for cancer patients and their families.