The latent mechanism behind binocular advantage in reading.

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Zhenyu Zhang, Tingting Wang, Zile Wang, Jinmei Xiao, Qingshang Ma, Xianyuan Yang, Fang-Fang Yan, Chang-Bing Huang
{"title":"The latent mechanism behind binocular advantage in reading.","authors":"Zhenyu Zhang, Tingting Wang, Zile Wang, Jinmei Xiao, Qingshang Ma, Xianyuan Yang, Fang-Fang Yan, Chang-Bing Huang","doi":"10.1167/jov.25.7.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most individuals read binocularly, and previous studies have found a binocular advantage in reading speed. However, the underlying mechanism of the binocular advantage in reading remains unclear. In our study, we quantified contributions from basic visual functions, basic oculomotor functions, and reading-specific eye movements to the binocular advantage in Chinese reading speed, using six tasks and 32 metrics. Consistent with prior research, we confirmed a binocular advantage in Chinese text reading, with binocular reading being approximately 4% faster than monocular reading. Interestingly, although basic visual and oculomotor functions themselves exhibited binocular advantages, they did not account for the observed binocular advantage in reading among individuals with normal vision. This finding is particularly noteworthy because it provides an important normative reference for individuals with impaired vision, in whom basic visual and oculomotor functions may serve as critical explanatory factors for reading performance. In contrast, the concurrent reduction of three reading-specific eye movement metrics-fixation count, average fixation duration, and progressive saccade count-under binocular conditions well explained the binocular advantage in reading, despite these metrics not demonstrating a binocular advantage in isolation. Our results suggest that efficient parafoveal preprocessing and faster neural processing in binocular vision might play critical roles in binocular advantage in reading for individuals with normal vision.</p>","PeriodicalId":49955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vision","volume":"25 7","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12169479/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.7.6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most individuals read binocularly, and previous studies have found a binocular advantage in reading speed. However, the underlying mechanism of the binocular advantage in reading remains unclear. In our study, we quantified contributions from basic visual functions, basic oculomotor functions, and reading-specific eye movements to the binocular advantage in Chinese reading speed, using six tasks and 32 metrics. Consistent with prior research, we confirmed a binocular advantage in Chinese text reading, with binocular reading being approximately 4% faster than monocular reading. Interestingly, although basic visual and oculomotor functions themselves exhibited binocular advantages, they did not account for the observed binocular advantage in reading among individuals with normal vision. This finding is particularly noteworthy because it provides an important normative reference for individuals with impaired vision, in whom basic visual and oculomotor functions may serve as critical explanatory factors for reading performance. In contrast, the concurrent reduction of three reading-specific eye movement metrics-fixation count, average fixation duration, and progressive saccade count-under binocular conditions well explained the binocular advantage in reading, despite these metrics not demonstrating a binocular advantage in isolation. Our results suggest that efficient parafoveal preprocessing and faster neural processing in binocular vision might play critical roles in binocular advantage in reading for individuals with normal vision.

双眼阅读优势背后的潜在机制。
大多数人用双眼阅读,以前的研究也发现双眼阅读在速度上有优势。然而,双眼阅读优势的潜在机制尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们使用6个任务和32个指标,量化了基本视觉功能、基本动眼肌功能和阅读特异性眼动对汉语阅读速度的双眼优势的贡献。与先前的研究一致,我们证实了双眼阅读在中文文本阅读方面的优势,双眼阅读比单眼阅读快约4%。有趣的是,虽然基本的视觉和动眼力功能本身表现出双眼优势,但它们并不能解释在视力正常的个体中观察到的双眼阅读优势。这一发现特别值得注意,因为它为视力受损的个体提供了重要的规范性参考,在这些个体中,基本的视觉和动眼肌功能可能是阅读表现的关键解释因素。相比之下,在双眼条件下,三个阅读特异性眼动指标(注视计数、平均注视时间和进步性扫视计数)的同时减少很好地解释了阅读时的双眼优势,尽管这些指标在单独情况下并没有显示出双眼优势。我们的研究结果表明,有效的中央凹前处理和更快的双眼视觉神经处理可能在正常视力个体的双眼阅读优势中起关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Vision
Journal of Vision 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
218
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Exploring all aspects of biological visual function, including spatial vision, perception, low vision, color vision and more, spanning the fields of neuroscience, psychology and psychophysics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信