A Cross-Sectional Study of Psychological Demands, Decision Authority and Social Support at Work in Norwegian Farmers Compared to Other Major Occupational Groups: The HUNT Study, Norway.
IF 2.1 3区 医学Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
{"title":"A Cross-Sectional Study of Psychological Demands, Decision Authority and Social Support at Work in Norwegian Farmers Compared to Other Major Occupational Groups: The HUNT Study, Norway.","authors":"Jonil Tau Sperstad, Eystein Skjerve, Karianne Muri, Kjersti Selstad Utaaker, Magnhild Oust Torske","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2025.2473449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Farming is an occupation with high levels of occupational stress. The objective of this study was to explore psychological job demand, decision authority, and social support at work in Norwegian farmers compared to other occupational groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the fourth wave of the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT4) was used, in which participants were registered with their main occupation, and items from the Swedish Demand-Control-Support (DCS) Questionnaire were included to measure self-reported psychosocial work environment. Each DCS dimension was dichotomized into high and low scores. Four job types were created by combining high and low scores of demand and decision authority (active, passive, low and high strain). Logistic regression analyses were used to explore associations between occupational groups and the three DCS dimensions, as well as job type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 20,268 participants in our sample, 800 were farmers. A small proportion of farmers had a combination of high demands and low decision authority (2.3%). Overall, farmers stood out from the other manual occupational groups with high levels of demand and decision authority. Compared with other main occupational groups, farmers were most similar to managers in terms of having an active job (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.66-0.94) and a high strain job (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.57-1.74).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although having a demanding occupation, the high decision authority experienced by most farmers prevents them from being in the high strain job category. Despite socioeconomic differences, farmers are more similar to managers than they are to other blue-collar workers with regards to psychosocial work environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":"30 3","pages":"506-518"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agromedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2025.2473449","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Farming is an occupation with high levels of occupational stress. The objective of this study was to explore psychological job demand, decision authority, and social support at work in Norwegian farmers compared to other occupational groups.
Methods: Data from the fourth wave of the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT4) was used, in which participants were registered with their main occupation, and items from the Swedish Demand-Control-Support (DCS) Questionnaire were included to measure self-reported psychosocial work environment. Each DCS dimension was dichotomized into high and low scores. Four job types were created by combining high and low scores of demand and decision authority (active, passive, low and high strain). Logistic regression analyses were used to explore associations between occupational groups and the three DCS dimensions, as well as job type.
Results: Of the 20,268 participants in our sample, 800 were farmers. A small proportion of farmers had a combination of high demands and low decision authority (2.3%). Overall, farmers stood out from the other manual occupational groups with high levels of demand and decision authority. Compared with other main occupational groups, farmers were most similar to managers in terms of having an active job (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.66-0.94) and a high strain job (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.57-1.74).
Conclusion: Although having a demanding occupation, the high decision authority experienced by most farmers prevents them from being in the high strain job category. Despite socioeconomic differences, farmers are more similar to managers than they are to other blue-collar workers with regards to psychosocial work environment.
目的:农业是一个职业压力高的职业。本研究旨在探讨挪威农民与其他职业群体的心理工作需求、决策权威和工作中的社会支持。方法:采用瑞典Trøndelag健康研究(HUNT4)第四期数据,参与者按主要职业进行登记,采用瑞典需求-控制-支持问卷(DCS)中的项目测量自我报告的工作心理社会环境。每个DCS维度分为高分和低分。将需求和决策权的高分和低分相结合,产生了四种工作类型(主动、被动、低压力和高压力)。采用Logistic回归分析探讨职业群体与DCS三个维度以及工作类型之间的关系。结果:在我们样本的20,268名参与者中,有800名是农民。一小部分农民既有高要求又有低决策权(2.3%)。总体而言,农民从其他手工职业群体中脱颖而出,具有高水平的需求和决策权。与其他主要职业群体相比,农民在积极工作方面与管理人员最相似(OR 0.79;95% CI 0.66-0.94)和高应变工作(OR 0.95;95% ci 0.57-1.74)。结论:虽然农民的职业要求很高,但大多数农民的高决策权使他们无法进入高压力的工作类别。尽管存在社会经济差异,但在社会心理工作环境方面,农民与管理人员比其他蓝领工人更相似。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Agromedicine: Practice, Policy, and Research publishes translational research, reports and editorials related to agricultural health, safety and medicine. The Journal of Agromedicine seeks to engage the global agricultural health and safety community including rural health care providers, agricultural health and safety practitioners, academic researchers, government agencies, policy makers, and others. The Journal of Agromedicine is committed to providing its readers with relevant, rigorously peer-reviewed, original articles. The journal welcomes high quality submissions as they relate to agricultural health and safety in the areas of:
• Behavioral and Mental Health
• Climate Change
• Education/Training
• Emerging Practices
• Environmental Public Health
• Epidemiology
• Ergonomics
• Injury Prevention
• Occupational and Industrial Health
• Pesticides
• Policy
• Safety Interventions and Evaluation
• Technology