Root coverage and patient-reported outcomes of de-epithelialized gingival graft with and without leukocyte platelet-rich fibrin in multiple recession defects: a split-mouth randomized trial.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ahu Uraz Corekci, Cansu Gursoy, Deniz Ozbay Cetiner, Berceste Guler Ayyildiz, Serpil Cula
{"title":"Root coverage and patient-reported outcomes of de-epithelialized gingival graft with and without leukocyte platelet-rich fibrin in multiple recession defects: a split-mouth randomized trial.","authors":"Ahu Uraz Corekci, Cansu Gursoy, Deniz Ozbay Cetiner, Berceste Guler Ayyildiz, Serpil Cula","doi":"10.5051/jpis.2404300215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was conducted to compare the clinical efficacy and patient-reported outcomes of de-epithelialized gingival graft (DGG) alone versus DGG combined with leukocyte platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) for the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions using a coronally advanced flap technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this split-mouth randomized controlled trial, 15 patients with multiple gingival recessions affecting at least 3 adjacent teeth were treated on one side with DGG only (termed the DGG group) and on the contralateral side with DGG and L-PRF (the DGG+PRF group). Clinical parameters-recession depth, recession width, probing depth, clinical attachment level, keratinized tissue width, gingival thickness, and percentage of root coverage (RC%)-were recorded at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Patient-reported outcome measures, including Oral Health Impact Profile-14 scores, postoperative pain, bleeding, discomfort, and analgesic consumption, were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At T6, the mean RC% was 93.30%±6.97% in the DGG group and 95.28%±4.99% in the DGG+PRF group, with no statistically significant difference observed. Patients receiving DGG+PRF reported significantly lower discomfort on days 2, 3, and 5 and reduced pain on days 6 and 7 relative to the DGG group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combining L-PRF with DGG achieves root coverage outcomes comparable to DGG alone, while significantly reducing early postoperative discomfort and morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2404300215","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to compare the clinical efficacy and patient-reported outcomes of de-epithelialized gingival graft (DGG) alone versus DGG combined with leukocyte platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) for the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions using a coronally advanced flap technique.

Methods: In this split-mouth randomized controlled trial, 15 patients with multiple gingival recessions affecting at least 3 adjacent teeth were treated on one side with DGG only (termed the DGG group) and on the contralateral side with DGG and L-PRF (the DGG+PRF group). Clinical parameters-recession depth, recession width, probing depth, clinical attachment level, keratinized tissue width, gingival thickness, and percentage of root coverage (RC%)-were recorded at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Patient-reported outcome measures, including Oral Health Impact Profile-14 scores, postoperative pain, bleeding, discomfort, and analgesic consumption, were also assessed.

Results: At T6, the mean RC% was 93.30%±6.97% in the DGG group and 95.28%±4.99% in the DGG+PRF group, with no statistically significant difference observed. Patients receiving DGG+PRF reported significantly lower discomfort on days 2, 3, and 5 and reduced pain on days 6 and 7 relative to the DGG group.

Conclusions: Combining L-PRF with DGG achieves root coverage outcomes comparable to DGG alone, while significantly reducing early postoperative discomfort and morbidity.

有或没有富白细胞血小板纤维蛋白的去上皮化牙龈移植治疗多种退行性缺损的牙根覆盖和患者报告的结果:一项裂口随机试验
目的:本研究比较单用去上皮化牙龈移植物(DGG)与DGG联合富白细胞血小板纤维蛋白(L-PRF)采用冠状先进皮瓣技术治疗邻近多处牙龈衰退的临床疗效和患者报告的结果。方法:对15例至少影响3颗邻牙的多发龈退缩患者,采用单侧DGG (DGG组)和对侧DGG+ L-PRF (DGG+PRF组)进行随机对照试验。在术后1个月、3个月和6个月记录临床参数-退缩深度、退缩宽度、探探深度、临床附着水平、角化组织宽度、牙龈厚度和根覆盖百分比(RC%)。还评估了患者报告的结果测量,包括口腔健康影响概况-14评分、术后疼痛、出血、不适和止痛药消耗。结果:T6时,DGG组的平均RC%为93.30%±6.97%,DGG+PRF组的平均RC%为95.28%±4.99%,差异无统计学意义。与DGG组相比,接受DGG+PRF治疗的患者在第2、3和5天的不适感明显降低,在第6和7天的疼痛也有所减轻。结论:L-PRF联合DGG可获得与单独DGG相当的根覆盖效果,同时显著减少术后早期不适和发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science (JPIS) is a peer-reviewed and open-access journal providing up-to-date information relevant to professionalism of periodontology and dental implantology. JPIS is dedicated to global and extensive publication which includes evidence-based original articles, and fundamental reviews in order to cover a variety of interests in the field of periodontal as well as implant science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信