{"title":"Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage: Progress and future outlook.","authors":"Si-Yao Wang, Si-Qiao Zhao, Shu-Peng Wang, Yue Zhang, Si-Yu Sun, Sheng Wang","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.104267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As an innovative endoscopic intervention, endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PD) demonstrates significant clinical value in resolving pancreatic ductal hypertension syndrome. By integrating real-time ultrasound guidance with catheter-based intervention techniques, this approach provides a safe and effective alternative for cases where conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography has failed. Current evidence indicates that EUS-PD achieves technical success rates ranging from 82% to 95% in alleviating symptomatic pancreatic duct hypertension caused by malignant obstructions and chronic pancreatitis-related strictures, with an overall complication rate (15%-20%) substantially lower than surgical interventions. Compared to conventional imaging modalities, EUS-PD offers superior anatomical visualization capabilities: Its high-frequency ultrasound probe enables precise identification of 3 mm-level pancreatic duct branches, while contrast-enhanced imaging significantly improves diagnostic accuracy in differentiating benign from malignant strictures (sensitivity 91% <i>vs</i> 73%, <i>P</i> < 0.05). Nevertheless, technical challenges persist, including difficult ductal puncture localization (particularly in pancreatic head lesions), complex guidewire axial control, and postoperative pancreatic fistula risks (7%-12%). This review systematically examines the clinical indications/contraindications, procedural protocols, device selection criteria, and management strategies for early/late complications associated with EUS-PD. Special emphasis is placed on establishing anatomical pathway selection standards for transgastric-pancreatic duct <i>vs</i> transduodenal-pancreatic duct approaches. Advancements in auxiliary technologies (<i>e.g.</i>, three-dimensional elastography, AI-assisted navigation) and multidisciplinary team collaboration are pivotal to developing standardized protocols. We propose establishing international multicenter registry databases and conducting prospective randomized controlled trials to clarify EUS-PD's position within pancreatic disease management systems. Such initiatives will facilitate the clinical transformation of EUS-PD from an \"alternative option\" to a \"preferred strategy\", ultimately enhancing treatment precision and improving clinical outcomes in pancreatic disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 5","pages":"104267"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12149936/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.104267","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As an innovative endoscopic intervention, endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PD) demonstrates significant clinical value in resolving pancreatic ductal hypertension syndrome. By integrating real-time ultrasound guidance with catheter-based intervention techniques, this approach provides a safe and effective alternative for cases where conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography has failed. Current evidence indicates that EUS-PD achieves technical success rates ranging from 82% to 95% in alleviating symptomatic pancreatic duct hypertension caused by malignant obstructions and chronic pancreatitis-related strictures, with an overall complication rate (15%-20%) substantially lower than surgical interventions. Compared to conventional imaging modalities, EUS-PD offers superior anatomical visualization capabilities: Its high-frequency ultrasound probe enables precise identification of 3 mm-level pancreatic duct branches, while contrast-enhanced imaging significantly improves diagnostic accuracy in differentiating benign from malignant strictures (sensitivity 91% vs 73%, P < 0.05). Nevertheless, technical challenges persist, including difficult ductal puncture localization (particularly in pancreatic head lesions), complex guidewire axial control, and postoperative pancreatic fistula risks (7%-12%). This review systematically examines the clinical indications/contraindications, procedural protocols, device selection criteria, and management strategies for early/late complications associated with EUS-PD. Special emphasis is placed on establishing anatomical pathway selection standards for transgastric-pancreatic duct vs transduodenal-pancreatic duct approaches. Advancements in auxiliary technologies (e.g., three-dimensional elastography, AI-assisted navigation) and multidisciplinary team collaboration are pivotal to developing standardized protocols. We propose establishing international multicenter registry databases and conducting prospective randomized controlled trials to clarify EUS-PD's position within pancreatic disease management systems. Such initiatives will facilitate the clinical transformation of EUS-PD from an "alternative option" to a "preferred strategy", ultimately enhancing treatment precision and improving clinical outcomes in pancreatic disorders.