Efficacy of laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer in older patients and its effects on inflammatory factors.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Zhen-Yu Min, Jie Zhou, Zhong-Wei Zhu, Zhen-Zhong Fa
{"title":"Efficacy of laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer in older patients and its effects on inflammatory factors.","authors":"Zhen-Yu Min, Jie Zhou, Zhong-Wei Zhu, Zhen-Zhong Fa","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.103065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, open surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) exhibits certain therapeutic efficacy; however, it may also hinder postoperative recovery in patients. Therefore, more advanced surgical methods are required to ensure smoother postoperative recovery.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To analyze the efficacy of laparoscopic radical resection of CRC (LRRCC) in treating older patients with CRC and the effect of this procedure on inflammatory factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 104 older patients with CRC admitted from August 2022 to August 2024. Participants undergoing open radical resection of CRC were categorized as the control group (50 patients), whereas those receiving LRRCC were classified as the research group (54 patients). Subsequently, comparative analyses involved data on efficacy, postoperative complications (ileus, incision infection, anastomotic fistula, and pulmonary infection), surgery-related parameters (operation duration and intraoperative bleeding volume), postoperative recovery-related indicators (time to first postoperative passage of flatus and defecation and length of hospital stay), and inflammatory factors (tumor necrosis factor-α, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data revealed markedly superior therapeutic efficacy and a lower overall postoperative complication rate in the research group compared to the control group. The research group demonstrated substantially less intraoperative bleeding, less time to first postoperative passage of flatus and defecation, and a shorter length of hospital stay despite a notably longer operation duration compared to the control group. Further, tumor necrosis factor-α, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6 levels in the research group were significantly reduced 3 days postoperatively compared to both the preoperative and control group values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LRRCC for older patients with CRC exhibited superior therapeutic efficacy compared to open radical resection and significantly suppressed postoperative stress-related inflammatory responses, which merits clinical application and promotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 5","pages":"103065"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12149926/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.103065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Currently, open surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) exhibits certain therapeutic efficacy; however, it may also hinder postoperative recovery in patients. Therefore, more advanced surgical methods are required to ensure smoother postoperative recovery.

Aim: To analyze the efficacy of laparoscopic radical resection of CRC (LRRCC) in treating older patients with CRC and the effect of this procedure on inflammatory factors.

Methods: The study included 104 older patients with CRC admitted from August 2022 to August 2024. Participants undergoing open radical resection of CRC were categorized as the control group (50 patients), whereas those receiving LRRCC were classified as the research group (54 patients). Subsequently, comparative analyses involved data on efficacy, postoperative complications (ileus, incision infection, anastomotic fistula, and pulmonary infection), surgery-related parameters (operation duration and intraoperative bleeding volume), postoperative recovery-related indicators (time to first postoperative passage of flatus and defecation and length of hospital stay), and inflammatory factors (tumor necrosis factor-α, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6).

Results: Data revealed markedly superior therapeutic efficacy and a lower overall postoperative complication rate in the research group compared to the control group. The research group demonstrated substantially less intraoperative bleeding, less time to first postoperative passage of flatus and defecation, and a shorter length of hospital stay despite a notably longer operation duration compared to the control group. Further, tumor necrosis factor-α, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6 levels in the research group were significantly reduced 3 days postoperatively compared to both the preoperative and control group values.

Conclusion: LRRCC for older patients with CRC exhibited superior therapeutic efficacy compared to open radical resection and significantly suppressed postoperative stress-related inflammatory responses, which merits clinical application and promotion.

腹腔镜大肠癌根治术治疗老年患者的疗效及对炎症因子的影响。
背景:目前,开放手术治疗结直肠癌(CRC)有一定的疗效;然而,它也可能阻碍患者术后恢复。因此,需要更先进的手术方法来保证术后更顺利的恢复。目的:分析腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术(LRRCC)治疗老年结直肠癌的疗效及对炎症因子的影响。方法:研究纳入了2022年8月至2024年8月收治的104例老年结直肠癌患者。接受开放式根治性结直肠癌切除术的参与者被归类为对照组(50例),而接受LRRCC的参与者被归类为研究组(54例)。随后,对疗效、术后并发症(肠梗阻、切口感染、吻合口瘘、肺部感染)、手术相关参数(手术时间、术中出血量)、术后恢复相关指标(术后首次排气排便时间、住院时间)、炎症因子(肿瘤坏死因子-α、高敏c反应蛋白、白细胞介素-6)进行比较分析。结果:数据显示研究组治疗效果明显优于对照组,术后总并发症发生率明显低于对照组。与对照组相比,研究组的术中出血明显减少,术后首次排气和排便时间更短,住院时间更短,尽管手术时间明显更长。此外,研究组术后3天肿瘤坏死因子-α、高敏c反应蛋白、白细胞介素-6水平均较术前和对照组显著降低。结论:LRRCC对老年结直肠癌患者的治疗效果优于开放根治术,可明显抑制术后应激相关炎症反应,值得临床推广应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信