{"title":"Effectiveness of early enteral nutrition support in patients undergoing gastrointestinal perforation repair surgery within the enhanced recovery.","authors":"Miao-Miao Hu, Ya-Li Ding, Juan Li","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.106384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastrointestinal (GI) perforation (GP) repair is a surgical procedure to promptly seal perforations in the GI tract to prevent further leakage. After surgery, patients often experience a high metabolic state due to trauma, infection, and postoperative stress. In the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol, early enteral nutrition is a key strategy for promoting postoperative recovery. Compared with parenteral nutrition, enteral nutrition more effectively meets the physiological needs of the GI system, promotes the recovery of gut function, and reduces the risk of GI infections.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the clinical efficacy of early enteral nutrition support in patients undergoing GP repair within the ERAS protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed 66 patients who underwent GP repair. Patients were divided into a control group (<i>n</i> = 32), managed with a traditional nutritional regimen, primarily consisting of total parenteral nutrition; and an observation group (<i>n</i> = 34), which included those who received early enteral nutrition support as part of the ERAS protocol. This study examined the time to first postoperative flatus and bowel movement, changes in nutritional and immune function, inflammatory markers on postoperative days 1 and 5, and adverse reactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The observation group had significantly shorter times to the first postoperative flatus and bowel movement than the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). On postoperative day 5, the observation group demonstrated higher nutritional and immune function levels than the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05), while C-reactive protein levels were significantly lower (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The overall incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 8.82% (3/34), which was lower than the 28.13% (9/32) observed in the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early enteral nutritional support facilitates GI recovery after GP repair. It improves nutritional status, enhances immune function, and attenuates inflammatory responses while also demonstrating a favorable safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 5","pages":"106384"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12149953/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.106384","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Gastrointestinal (GI) perforation (GP) repair is a surgical procedure to promptly seal perforations in the GI tract to prevent further leakage. After surgery, patients often experience a high metabolic state due to trauma, infection, and postoperative stress. In the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol, early enteral nutrition is a key strategy for promoting postoperative recovery. Compared with parenteral nutrition, enteral nutrition more effectively meets the physiological needs of the GI system, promotes the recovery of gut function, and reduces the risk of GI infections.
Aim: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of early enteral nutrition support in patients undergoing GP repair within the ERAS protocol.
Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 66 patients who underwent GP repair. Patients were divided into a control group (n = 32), managed with a traditional nutritional regimen, primarily consisting of total parenteral nutrition; and an observation group (n = 34), which included those who received early enteral nutrition support as part of the ERAS protocol. This study examined the time to first postoperative flatus and bowel movement, changes in nutritional and immune function, inflammatory markers on postoperative days 1 and 5, and adverse reactions.
Results: The observation group had significantly shorter times to the first postoperative flatus and bowel movement than the control group (P < 0.05). On postoperative day 5, the observation group demonstrated higher nutritional and immune function levels than the control group (P < 0.05), while C-reactive protein levels were significantly lower (P < 0.05). The overall incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 8.82% (3/34), which was lower than the 28.13% (9/32) observed in the control group (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Early enteral nutritional support facilitates GI recovery after GP repair. It improves nutritional status, enhances immune function, and attenuates inflammatory responses while also demonstrating a favorable safety profile.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
