A Typology of Stalking Victims' Nonreporting Justifications: Objective Measures Related to Help-Seeking Behavior.

IF 2.3 3区 社会学 Q1 WOMENS STUDIES
Sujung Cho, Claire Seungeun Lee
{"title":"A Typology of Stalking Victims' Nonreporting Justifications: Objective Measures Related to Help-Seeking Behavior.","authors":"Sujung Cho, Claire Seungeun Lee","doi":"10.1177/10778012251347604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study applies rational choice and neutralization theories to examine stalking victims' nonreporting behaviors using data from the National Crime Victimization Survey's Supplemental Victimization Survey. Latent class analysis revealed four subgroups based on rationales for not reporting: denial of stalker's intent (7.4%), rejection of victim identity (18.3%), lack of rationale (53.4%), and denial of serious harm (21.2%). Findings align with Weiss's framework, showing how perceptions of severity and victim-offender relationships influence reporting. Victims stalked by strangers were more likely to seek help. Results highlight the need for risk assessments and tailored interventions to increase reporting among reluctant victims.</p>","PeriodicalId":23606,"journal":{"name":"Violence Against Women","volume":" ","pages":"10778012251347604"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Violence Against Women","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012251347604","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study applies rational choice and neutralization theories to examine stalking victims' nonreporting behaviors using data from the National Crime Victimization Survey's Supplemental Victimization Survey. Latent class analysis revealed four subgroups based on rationales for not reporting: denial of stalker's intent (7.4%), rejection of victim identity (18.3%), lack of rationale (53.4%), and denial of serious harm (21.2%). Findings align with Weiss's framework, showing how perceptions of severity and victim-offender relationships influence reporting. Victims stalked by strangers were more likely to seek help. Results highlight the need for risk assessments and tailored interventions to increase reporting among reluctant victims.

跟踪受害者不报告理由的类型学:与求助行为相关的客观测量。
本研究运用理性选择和中和理论,利用国家犯罪受害调查补充受害调查的数据,对跟踪受害者的不报告行为进行了研究。潜在类别分析显示了四个基于不报告理由的亚组:否认跟踪者的意图(7.4%),拒绝受害者身份(18.3%),缺乏理由(53.4%)和否认严重伤害(21.2%)。研究结果与韦斯的框架一致,显示了对严重性和受害者-犯罪者关系的看法如何影响报告。被陌生人跟踪的受害者更有可能寻求帮助。结果强调需要进行风险评估和量身定制的干预措施,以增加不情愿受害者的报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Violence Against Women
Violence Against Women WOMENS STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: Violence against Women is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of research and information on all aspects of the problem of violence against women. The journal assumes a broad definition of violence; topics to be covered include, but are not limited to, domestic violence, sexual assault, incest, sexual harassment, female infantcide, female circumcision, and female sexual slavery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信